Re: [Users] tagged vs untagged and sharing the interface
ok, i started over on my ovirt cluster here. now that i have built a new data center and modified my ovirtmgmt network (to be tagged as vlan 3200), if i try to edit the interface to create a bond, ovirtmgmt does not move to the right side so i can reassign it to the new bond interface, it disappears all together. so then i cancel. i go back into the edit host networks window, and this time i just assign my iscsi vlan to the other interface, check for static on both, and then click ok. but ovirt deletes the ovirtmgmt interface off the node and i lose the node from the network. very strange the the ovirtmgmt network disappears :( On 12/27/12 5:42 PM, Jeff Bailey bai...@cs.kent.edu wrote: On 12/27/2012 6:10 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: On 12/27/12 2:57 PM, Jeff Bailey bai...@cs.kent.edu wrote: On 12/27/2012 3:01 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: if someone could help me confirm, but it appear that i cannot co-populate tagged vlan on the same interface as ovirtmgmt? You can but you need to edit the ovirtmgmt network to make it tagged before adding a cluster to the datacenter. It tells me cannot edit management network. If there is already a cluster attached to the datacenter then you can't edit the ovirtmgmt network. You may be able to create another temporary datecenter, move your cluster, edit the network and then move the cluster back. If you edit the network before adding a cluster and hosts then it's easier. I'm not sure you'll be able to move the cluster though. I haven't tried that. If you can't then you'll probably have to remove the hosts and cluster and add them back afterwards. There has been recent discussion about improving this situation so in the future this may not be a problem. for me it would really be better if i can share these 2 on same interface, but if i can't ill just have to live with it. can any one confirm this? thanks, jonathan --- - This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] tagged vs untagged and sharing the interface
On 12/28/2012 3:25 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: ok, i started over on my ovirt cluster here. now that i have built a new data center and modified my ovirtmgmt network (to be tagged as vlan 3200), if i try to edit the interface to create a bond, ovirtmgmt does not move to the right side so i can reassign it to the new bond interface, it disappears all together. so then i cancel. i go back into the edit host networks window, and this time i just assign my iscsi vlan to the other interface, check for static on both, and then click ok. but ovirt deletes the ovirtmgmt interface off the node and i lose the node from the network. very strange the the ovirtmgmt network disappears :( I have not tried any bonding. What version are you running? I don't think I've ever actually tried to configure the ovirtmgmt network with the GUI. I would assume that it's supposed to work but I can't confirm that. I either manually configure it the way I want it on a plain Fedora install or use the TUI on initial Node setup. I know there have been fixes between 3.1 and the 3.2 alpha (3.1 just didn't work for me at all). Perhaps there were bonding problems that have been corrected. If you can, you might want to hang on to the logs (engine and vdsm) from the time you tried to change the network config. On 12/27/12 5:42 PM, Jeff Bailey bai...@cs.kent.edu wrote: On 12/27/2012 6:10 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: On 12/27/12 2:57 PM, Jeff Bailey bai...@cs.kent.edu wrote: On 12/27/2012 3:01 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: if someone could help me confirm, but it appear that i cannot co-populate tagged vlan on the same interface as ovirtmgmt? You can but you need to edit the ovirtmgmt network to make it tagged before adding a cluster to the datacenter. It tells me cannot edit management network. If there is already a cluster attached to the datacenter then you can't edit the ovirtmgmt network. You may be able to create another temporary datecenter, move your cluster, edit the network and then move the cluster back. If you edit the network before adding a cluster and hosts then it's easier. I'm not sure you'll be able to move the cluster though. I haven't tried that. If you can't then you'll probably have to remove the hosts and cluster and add them back afterwards. There has been recent discussion about improving this situation so in the future this may not be a problem. for me it would really be better if i can share these 2 on same interface, but if i can't ill just have to live with it. can any one confirm this? thanks, jonathan --- - This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] tagged vs untagged and sharing the interface
I'm using 3.1 on centos. so far its been no problem creating the bond, and then (after the ovirtmgmt moves to the unassigned column) reattaching ovirtmgmt network to the bond. On 12/28/12 3:18 PM, Jeff Bailey bai...@cs.kent.edu wrote: On 12/28/2012 3:25 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: ok, i started over on my ovirt cluster here. now that i have built a new data center and modified my ovirtmgmt network (to be tagged as vlan 3200), if i try to edit the interface to create a bond, ovirtmgmt does not move to the right side so i can reassign it to the new bond interface, it disappears all together. so then i cancel. i go back into the edit host networks window, and this time i just assign my iscsi vlan to the other interface, check for static on both, and then click ok. but ovirt deletes the ovirtmgmt interface off the node and i lose the node from the network. very strange the the ovirtmgmt network disappears :( I have not tried any bonding. What version are you running? I don't think I've ever actually tried to configure the ovirtmgmt network with the GUI. I would assume that it's supposed to work but I can't confirm that. I either manually configure it the way I want it on a plain Fedora install or use the TUI on initial Node setup. I know there have been fixes between 3.1 and the 3.2 alpha (3.1 just didn't work for me at all). Perhaps there were bonding problems that have been corrected. If you can, you might want to hang on to the logs (engine and vdsm) from the time you tried to change the network config. On 12/27/12 5:42 PM, Jeff Bailey bai...@cs.kent.edu wrote: On 12/27/2012 6:10 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: On 12/27/12 2:57 PM, Jeff Bailey bai...@cs.kent.edu wrote: On 12/27/2012 3:01 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: if someone could help me confirm, but it appear that i cannot co-populate tagged vlan on the same interface as ovirtmgmt? You can but you need to edit the ovirtmgmt network to make it tagged before adding a cluster to the datacenter. It tells me cannot edit management network. If there is already a cluster attached to the datacenter then you can't edit the ovirtmgmt network. You may be able to create another temporary datecenter, move your cluster, edit the network and then move the cluster back. If you edit the network before adding a cluster and hosts then it's easier. I'm not sure you'll be able to move the cluster though. I haven't tried that. If you can't then you'll probably have to remove the hosts and cluster and add them back afterwards. There has been recent discussion about improving this situation so in the future this may not be a problem. for me it would really be better if i can share these 2 on same interface, but if i can't ill just have to live with it. can any one confirm this? thanks, jonathan - -- - This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant
Re: [Users] tagged vs untagged and sharing the interface
Hi You can have as many vlan as you want on the same interface. Just create a new interface on the cluster with the required vlan set, and associate it on each node on the cluster. Ovirtmgmt is attached by default to an untagged interface, and you can add vlan and configure your switch port in dual mode (native vlan on cisco ).So your physical interface will handle ovirtmgmt on native vlan and others vlan on vlan interface on node. Don't Forget to update ovirtmgmt interface when adding an interface to the node, or ovirtmgmt will be in DHCP. Kevin Le 27 déc. 2012 21:01, Jonathan Horne jho...@skopos.us a écrit : if someone could help me confirm, but it appear that i cannot co-populate tagged vlan on the same interface as ovirtmgmt? for me it would really be better if i can share these 2 on same interface, but if i can't ill just have to live with it. can any one confirm this? thanks, jonathan -- This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] tagged vs untagged and sharing the interface
On 12/27/12 2:57 PM, Jeff Bailey bai...@cs.kent.edu wrote: On 12/27/2012 3:01 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: if someone could help me confirm, but it appear that i cannot co-populate tagged vlan on the same interface as ovirtmgmt? You can but you need to edit the ovirtmgmt network to make it tagged before adding a cluster to the datacenter. It tells me cannot edit management network. for me it would really be better if i can share these 2 on same interface, but if i can't ill just have to live with it. can any one confirm this? thanks, jonathan This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] tagged vs untagged and sharing the interface
On 12/27/2012 6:10 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: On 12/27/12 2:57 PM, Jeff Bailey bai...@cs.kent.edu wrote: On 12/27/2012 3:01 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote: if someone could help me confirm, but it appear that i cannot co-populate tagged vlan on the same interface as ovirtmgmt? You can but you need to edit the ovirtmgmt network to make it tagged before adding a cluster to the datacenter. It tells me cannot edit management network. If there is already a cluster attached to the datacenter then you can't edit the ovirtmgmt network. You may be able to create another temporary datecenter, move your cluster, edit the network and then move the cluster back. If you edit the network before adding a cluster and hosts then it's easier. I'm not sure you'll be able to move the cluster though. I haven't tried that. If you can't then you'll probably have to remove the hosts and cluster and add them back afterwards. There has been recent discussion about improving this situation so in the future this may not be a problem. for me it would really be better if i can share these 2 on same interface, but if i can't ill just have to live with it. can any one confirm this? thanks, jonathan This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
