[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-20 Thread Matthew J Black
Another +1 - We've been using Rocky (8) for a few years now and its been great. (Yes, we're prep-ing to update to RL9 at the moment, but we've had a "minor" iSCSI connectivity issue just raise its ugly head so we're dealing with that right now :-( ) And for the record: My personal ambition

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-15 Thread Jorge Visentini
I also agree... I believe that, in addition to the location of the binaries (which is different for other distributions), I think another problem is going to a distribution that does not support NetworkManager. I confess that I've never been a fan of SUSE, but it's worth staying up to date with

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-14 Thread Sketch
Doesn't a vote for "support Rocky 9" basically mean "continue supporting RHEL 9 and derivatives"? So effecitvely no change from 4.5 except for potentially dropping EL8. On Wed, 13 Dec 2023, Jean-Louis Dupond via Users wrote: The ONLY was Rocky Linux 9 will be supported is by somebody doing a

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-13 Thread Jorge Visentini
Hi all! Just to sweeten the conversation... We're running Virt 4.5.5 on CentOS Stream 9 and everything works wonderfully. I tested the Engine and host installation using RL9 and it also worked. Here we used several Supermicros, HPE DL560 Gen10, Gigabyte CL2200 Gen10, Dell R930, and they were all

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-13 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond via Users
The ONLY was Rocky Linux 9 will be supported is by somebody doing a complete check of everything (ovirt-engine, vdsm, etc), and makes it compatible with RL9 and get all the changes/fixes merges. Supporting RL9 does also not mean we cannot support any other distro next to it. For example

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-13 Thread Patrick Dubois via Users
I would like to add +1 for Rocky.   I believe it's a strong contender for long term stability and cooperation. Pat. On 2023-12-12 17:41, d...@bornfree.org wrote: We have had positive experience with Rocky Linux 9.  We run RL9 for most of our VMs under oVirt 4.4.  We also run RL9 on some of

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-13 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
ed >> (成就他人) >> >> From: d03 >> Date: 2023-12-13 06:41 >> To: users >> Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions >> >> We have had positive experience with Rocky Linux 9. We run RL9 for most >> of our VMs under oVirt 4.4. We

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-13 Thread Andrei Verovski
uel@horebdata.cn wrote: > > Plus one > > Do Right Thing (做正确的事) / Pursue Excellence (追求卓越) / Help Others Succeed (成就他人) > > From: d03 > Date: 2023-12-13 06:41 > To: users > Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions > > We have had positive experience with

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-13 Thread samuel....@horebdata.cn
Plus one Do Right Thing (做正确的事) / Pursue Excellence (追求卓越) / Help Others Succeed (成就他人) From: d03 Date: 2023-12-13 06:41 To: users Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions We have had positive experience with Rocky Linux 9. We run RL9 for most of our VMs under oVirt 4.4. We also

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-12 Thread d03
We have had positive experience with Rocky Linux 9. We run RL9 for most of our VMs under oVirt 4.4. We also run RL9 on some of our stand-alone HP Gen8 servers. We are also currently running oVirt 4.4 on HP Gen8 servers and will probably run oVirt 4.6 on HP Gen8 servers. So, my vote is

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-12 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
As oVirt is no longer a RHV-Next upstream, I don't see a reason for trying to convince the community to keep using CentOS Stream as the chosen OS for 4.6 development. As a community, you all can suggest which OS you'd like to have in your datacenter, gather consensus about it and change oVirt as

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-12 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
Whatever it’s Redhat or a clone, the situation is the same, Stream is a risky path, independently of the reliability of the OS by itself. > Le 12 déc. 2023 à 11:29, Fabrice Bacchella a > écrit : > > I have a problem with CentOS stream. > > The purpose of Redhat and clone is to have good

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-12 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond via Users
Then pay for redhat? I really don't understand this. You want a free OS with a team of people behind that help you within x hours if you have an issue, but you don't want to pay for it. Either pay, or use centos stream and report the issues/debug them yourselves. On 12/12/2023 11:29,

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-12 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
I have a problem with CentOS stream. The purpose of Redhat and clone is to have good hardware and software support. Vendors will provide tools and driver to know OS versions. I’m afraid that in case of problems with Stream release, I will be on my own, with unexpected broken node in case of

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.6 OS versions

2023-12-11 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il giorno lun 11 dic 2023 alle ore 21:43 ha scritto: > > Has it yet been decided which OS and version will be used for the oVirt > 4.6 Hosted Engine and for 4.6 oVirt Node? > > As far as I can tell, no. There was a discussion about rebasing on CentOS Stream 10 or on Fedora in this list, but I