Jeff Chan wrote:
Default scores should be ok. The default configuration should
have rules and scores already in place.
Firstly, thanks to everyone who has contributed some advice thus far. I
ran some spam through spamassassin via the command line. I su'd to to
the amavisd-new user (vscan), and
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:10:39AM +0200, Mattia Martinello wrote:
> Ok, so how I can do if I wish SpamAssassin to change the subject and to
> write SPAM headers when it detects a SPAM message?
As has been previously stated, your issue is qmail-scanner related,
so you need to talk to those folks
>
> Now I am using verbose_spamassassin, but it doesn't work... :-(
>
Did you make the suggested mod to qmail-scanner.pl ?
my $spamc_subject=``;
Does anyone know of a POC to report phishing msgs that the mailpolice rbl
misses?
--
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
6:24pm up 15 days, 2:18, 1 user, load average: 0.05, 0.07, 0.13
I just remembered something a
On 10/19/2004 1:14 AM +0200, Mattia Martinello wrote:
I'll bet your are using fast_spamassassin with qmail-scanner rather
than verbose_spamassassin. fast_spamassassin does NOT add anything to
the email except what qmail-scanner might add. verbose_spamassassin
is what you want to use instead.
I'll bet your are using fast_spamassassin with qmail-scanner rather than
verbose_spamassassin. fast_spamassassin does NOT add anything to the
email except what qmail-scanner might add. verbose_spamassassin is what
you want to use instead.
Now I am using verbose_spamassassin, but it doesn't wor
I added this to /usr/local/share/spamassassin/25_uribl.cf, now it working fine.
Thanks Jeff.
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, October 18, 2004, 12:27:59 AM, Khalid Waheed wrote:
The original message and test result is given below,
I'm wondering how to improve the score of this messag
right, "required_score" doesn't affect your rewriting/markup, they handle
that.
Ok, so how I can do if I wish SpamAssassin to change the subject and to
write SPAM headers when it detects a SPAM message?
Mattia Martinello wrote:
aha. you need to talk to the qmail-scanner people. iirc, they handle
the
markup themselves, so your spamd config is meaningless, at least by
default.
But if I change the "required_score" value, I can see it changed in the
"X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=8.0" h
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:02:12AM +0200, Mattia Martinello wrote:
> >aha. you need to talk to the qmail-scanner people. iirc, they handle the
> >markup themselves, so your spamd config is meaningless, at least by
> >default.
>
> But if I change the "required_score" value, I can see it changed
Kevin W. Gagel ha scritto:
What is your MTA and how is your MTA integrated to use SpamAssassin?
My MTA is Qmail, and it is integrated with SpamAssassin with
Qmail-Scanner...
What is your MTA and how is your MTA integrated to use SpamAssassin?
- Original Message Follows -
From: Mattia Martinello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Doesn't mark spam messages
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:37:02 +0200
> > Get rid of the "terse report" o
aha. you need to talk to the qmail-scanner people. iirc, they handle the
markup themselves, so your spamd config is meaningless, at least by default.
But if I change the "required_score" value, I can see it changed in the
"X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=8.0" header...
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:57:00AM +0200, Mattia Martinello wrote:
> I am calling Spamassassin with Qmail-Scanner.
aha. you need to talk to the qmail-scanner people. iirc, they handle the
markup themselves, so your spamd config is meaningless, at least by default.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline
Hrm. How are you calling spamassassin/spamd? The X-Spam-Status header
you quote is not the standard 3.0 one (it would be "score=", and there'd
be a listing of rules...) Either you're using old modules, or whatever
you use to pass through SA is actually doing the markup.
I am calling Spamassassin
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:47:09AM +0200, Mattia Martinello wrote:
> >If you don't get any X-Spam headers, then the mail isn't being fed through
> >spamd. You will always get at least a X-Spam-Checker-Version header.
>
> I get only this header: "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=8.0".
>
> So
Run a spamassassin --lint I bet it will show you an error. Read the
UPGRADE file, it will tell you that rewrite_header is no longer used.
spamassassin --lint didn't show me any error message.
I carefully read man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf and I don't think I used
any deprecated conf...
Bye
ma
Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 10/18/2004 05:47:32 PM:
>
> Mattia Martinello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/18/2004
> 05:37:02 PM:
>
[snip]>
> Run a spamassassin --lint I bet it will show you an error. Read
> the UPGRADE file, it will tell you that rewrite_header is no longer
Mattia Martinello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 10/18/2004 05:37:02 PM:
> > Get rid of the "terse report" option.
>
> Now this is my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
>
> required_score 8
> report_safe 0
> #use_terse_report 0
> use_bayes 1
> bayes_auto_learn 1
> skip_rbl_checks 0
> use_razor2 1
>
If you don't get any X-Spam headers, then the mail isn't being fed through
spamd. You will always get at least a X-Spam-Checker-Version header.
I get only this header: "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=8.0".
So how I can get all the headers that I can insert in local.cf?
Thank you very much!
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:37:02AM +0200, Mattia Martinello wrote:
> I restarted spamd, but I can't solve the problem. Spam messages that
> have a score higher than 8 are not marked with [SPAM] in the
> subject and it never adds any header (Flag, Score, Tests, etc.) in the
> message head
Nathan Johanson wrote:
Sorry if those questions are too obvious to all you, but I'm
completely
lost - I'm unable to digest all the info available on the web. If you
can help me to find out if I need a milter or not, and if so, which
milter do I need, I'll continue with more questions :-)
Thank
Get rid of the "terse report" option.
Now this is my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
required_score 8
report_safe 0
#use_terse_report 0
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
skip_rbl_checks 0
use_razor2 1
use_dcc 1
use_pyzor 1
#fold_headers 1
rewrite_header subject [SPAM]
add_header all Flag _YES
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:19:18AM +0200, Dietmar Lippold wrote:
> * Which tests (SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAMEs) are not used when I run
>spamassassin or spamd which option "-L"?
any that have a "tflags net" set.
> * How can I disable network tests by entries in user_prefs (e.g. when
>I use spamc
I have some questions about network tests in spamassassin version 3.0.0
(on Fedora 2):
* Which tests (SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAMEs) are not used when I run
spamassassin or spamd which option "-L"?
* How can I disable network tests by entries in user_prefs (e.g. when
I use spamc but spamd runs with
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:02:11 -0400, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Why ask any of us, look at the headers of your message on the list:
>
>Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 207.217.120.253 as permitted sender)
D'oh!
Thank you for pointing o
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:02 PM
> To: Steven Stern; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Testing SPF
>
>
> At 04:59 PM 10/18/2004, Steven Stern wrote:
> >I've set up the SPF TXT record for my domain, al
At 04:59 PM 10/18/2004, Steven Stern wrote:
I've set up the SPF TXT record for my domain, although I'm not quite sure it's
correct or acceptable to SA 3 because I have to pass my outgoing mail through
Earthlink as a smarthost. I'd like to send a email to a few of you checking
SPF to see what resul
I've set up the SPF TXT record for my domain, although I'm not quite sure it's
correct or acceptable to SA 3 because I have to pass my outgoing mail through
Earthlink as a smarthost. I'd like to send a email to a few of you checking
SPF to see what result you get.
Please reply directly to me and
At 03:05 PM 10/18/2004, Payal Rathod wrote:
Hi,
I have SA and bayes for a few accounts and have trained bayes to around
1200 hams and 1000 spams. Is this enough? I have reduced spam a lot,
but still a few spam mails do pass through. What do I do about them?
I do training manually, checking each mai
> I've just installed SpamAssassin 3.0.0 under Windoze. It appears to be
> working as documented. However, I'm uncertain what I've done
> to make SPF
> checking not function. Network stuff appears OK because:
> a) it takes a while to run (ca. 5 seconds) and
> b) Blacklists work (I see headers l
I've just installed SpamAssassin 3.0.0 under Windoze. It appears to be
working as documented. However, I'm uncertain what I've done to make SPF
checking not function. Network stuff appears OK because:
a) it takes a while to run (ca. 5 seconds) and
b) Blacklists work (I see headers like: X-Spam-
(replying to self)
Two things:
1) sorry for the dupe message earlier
2) the comment was referring to SURBLs, if that wasn't clear:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:35:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Blacklisting domains that are included in the content of spam
> messages has been a very successful tech
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:09:11 -0400, Payal Rathod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>But that means again I have scan mailboxes manually for false positives
>or false negatives.
>
I have two mailboxes, "should-be-ham" and "should-be-spam" that are processed
by a cron job at noon and midnight. I just f
Thanks to all who replied. This sums it up quite well and confirms my doubts
about the algorithm-exclusive methods. As always I appreciate this list's
objectivity on the topic.
--
Mathieu Nantel, RHCE - Systems Manager
Ecopia BioSciences Inc.
(514) 336-2724 x434
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:32:10 -0400, "Mathieu Nantel" said:
> As I've read a few articles on DSPAM claiming that it's
> better/faster/sexier than spamassassin, I would appreciate having this
> list's comment on DSPAM.
> I'm sure quite a few of you have tried it and might have some interesting
> e
Mathieu Nantel wrote:
As I've read a few articles on DSPAM claiming that it's better/faster/sexier
than spamassassin, I would appreciate having this list's comment on DSPAM.
I'm sure quite a few of you have tried it and might have some interesting
experiences to share. My understanding is that D
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:07:08PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Automate the training... when you notice a false positive, put it in a "false
> positives" location. When you notice a false negative, put it in a "false
> negatives" location.
>
But that means again I have scan mailboxes manu
Payal Rathod wrote:
> Hi,
> I have SA and bayes for a few accounts and have trained bayes
> to around
> 1200 hams and 1000 spams. Is this enough? I have reduced spam a lot,
> but still a few spam mails do pass through. What do I do about them?
> I do training manually, checking each mailbox, so it
Hi,
I have SA and bayes for a few accounts and have trained bayes to around
1200 hams and 1000 spams. Is this enough? I have reduced spam a lot,
but still a few spam mails do pass through. What do I do about them?
I do training manually, checking each mailbox, so it is a hectic process.
When do I s
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 11:32, Mathieu Nantel wrote:
> Good day list,
>
> As I've read a few articles on DSPAM claiming that it's better/faster/sexier
> than spamassassin, I would appreciate having this list's comment on DSPAM.
> I'm sure quite a few of you have tried it and might have some intere
At 02:32 PM 10/18/2004, Mathieu Nantel wrote:
As I've read a few articles on DSPAM claiming that it's better/faster/sexier
than spamassassin, I would appreciate having this list's comment on DSPAM.
I'm sure quite a few of you have tried it and might have some interesting
experiences to share. My un
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 11:49 AM
> To: 'Mathieu Nantel'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [OFFTOPIC] Opinions on DSPAM
>
>
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Mathieu Nantel [mailto:[EMAI
>-Original Message-
>From: Mathieu Nantel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:32 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: [OFFTOPIC] Opinions on DSPAM
>
>
>Good day list,
>
>As I've read a few articles on DSPAM claiming that it's
>better/faster/sexier
>tha
Good day list,
As I've read a few articles on DSPAM claiming that it's better/faster/sexier
than spamassassin, I would appreciate having this list's comment on DSPAM.
I'm sure quite a few of you have tried it and might have some interesting
experiences to share. My understanding is that DSPAM r
Bob Proulx wrote:
I am trying to understand how SpamAssassin 3.0.0 is checking SPF on
messages. It seems to be checking the Return-Path: address (envelope
address) and not the From: address (header address). That's wrong,
isn't it? Shouldn't it be checking the header address? Of course
when I r
Hi,
In-line response.
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:25 AM 10/18/2004, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Why would one not rely on SA running as one and only one user when
writing to bayes and auto_whitelist files ? Is that not the whole
reason behind having a separate user to run spamd as ?
Yes, but using bay
At 11:25 AM 10/18/2004, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Why would one not rely on SA running as one and only one user when writing
to bayes and auto_whitelist files ? Is that not the whole reason behind
having a separate user to run spamd as ?
Yes, but using bayes_path defeats the purpose of having a sep
At 11:45 AM 10/18/2004, Justin Fielding wrote:
Looks ok now I have the use_dcc = 0 in local.cf.
There shouldn't be an = in that line. Just:
use_dcc 0
that's it.
It seems to be picking the directory up ok. Where do I add the DNSBL of
spamhaus? /etc/init.d/spamassassin ?
Why do you think you need t
sorry matt - didnt meen to be rude! hehe - yeah i take that on board and
ill give it a shot. Ive just checked my logs and spamd does suid nobody
while dealing with a message. I run a sitewaide config on 3 mailhubs
with no user preferneces, so if i run the initial spamd as a non root
user, this
Oct 18 18:34:26 plesk spamd[13231]: spamd starting
Oct 18 18:34:32 plesk spamd[13235]: server started on port 783/tcp (running
version 3.0.0)
Oct 18 18:34:32 plesk spamd[13235]: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 13248
Oct 18 18:34:32 plesk spamd[13235]: server successfully spawned chil
At 11:21 AM 10/18/2004, Justin Fielding wrote:
I added:
URIBL_SBL sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
to my local.cf, should this work?
What would that do, besides generate a syntax error?
What are you even trying to do there?
run spamassassin --lint and fix your errors.
At 10:50 AM 10/18/2004, Thomas Kaehn wrote:
Hi,
I am using amavisd-new along with SpamAssassin 3.0. Recently I've
noticed, that a mail couldn't be delivered, because SA timed out as it
had to do many DNS lookups.
The mail had lots of URLs in its body. It is not really SpamAssassin's
or amavisd-new'
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:02 AM 10/18/2004, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
No, they keep running as root all the time.
98160 root 62 0 49992K 41208K RUN 0:09 18.49% 17.53%
perl5.8.2
It's a large bug here that affects the permissions of the
bayes_journal file etc since it gets owned by r
I added:
URIBL_SBL sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
to my local.cf, should this work?
Many Thanks,
Justin Fielding,
Intelliweb Ltd UK.
A mission statement is defined as "a long awkward sentence that demonstrates
management's inability to think clearly." All good companies have one. -
Scott Adams, The Dilb
At 11:11 AM 10/18/2004, Marco Maske wrote:
Maybe "whitelist_from" works bether for you:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do not EVER do this. Spammers frequently forge your own domain in the From:
line, and such email will be automatically whitelisted if you do this.
Bad idea. Don't even conside
At 10:56 AM 10/18/2004, Ronan wrote:
so theres no way for the forseeable future to have them idle as non root???
Is it advisable jsut to let the configuration be for the time being!? or
are the other options available to me?!
Sure there is.. you can start spamd as a non-root user.. Spamd runs as
½Bî¶ §ºµth£Ñ½ (southen) wrote:
> >I'm trying to whitelist domains on my server (all domains on my server
> > are my own domains). I have tried various ways, and I can't seem to
> > get it to work. I tried typing at the prompt "spamassassin
> > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED], .
Matt Ke
At 10:02 AM 10/18/2004, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
No, they keep running as root all the time.
98160 root 62 0 49992K 41208K RUN 0:09 18.49% 17.53% perl5.8.2
It's a large bug here that affects the permissions of the bayes_journal
file etc since it gets owned by root instead of the -u u
At 10:33 AM 10/18/2004, Justin Fielding wrote:
I hashed out the dcc path in local.cf, but it still tries to load it:
Just because you removed the option doesn't mean SA won't try to load dcc.
The path is option only over-rides the default of trying to hunt around and
load it if it can find it in s
At 10:00 AM 10/18/2004, Justin Fielding wrote:
a.. Another handy option to take care of this is to pass spamd the -H option
with /etc/mail/spamassassin as the argument. This sets all helper apps'
(dccproc/pyzor/razor) homedirs to /etc/mail/spamassassin.
Where do I put the -H option, where is the c
I built and installed SpamAssassin 3.0 on my RedHat EL/WS system.
I built it using the command:
perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local
I chose to use PREFIX because I'd like to keep everything associated
with SpamAssassin on my /usr/local partition, out of the way of system
upgrades, etc.
The
so theres no way for the forseeable future to have them idle as non root???
Is it advisable jsut to let the configuration be for the time being!? or
are the other options available to me?!
thanks
ronqn
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 02:12 PM 10/18/2004 +0100, Ronan wrote:
In SA 3.
Im configuring a new server and decided to go with SA 3.0. My question is
I installed it, it appears to be running. So to complete the server setup
I install qmail-scanner, it tries to find applications it recognizes but
for SA it comes back with an error stating it appears it found spamc but
insta
Hi,
I am using amavisd-new along with SpamAssassin 3.0. Recently I've
noticed, that a mail couldn't be delivered, because SA timed out as it
had to do many DNS lookups.
The mail had lots of URLs in its body. It is not really SpamAssassin's
or amavisd-new's fault. But is there a solution to this p
I hashed out the dcc path in local.cf, but it still tries to load it:
Oct 18 17:31:15 plesk spamd[12730]: spamd starting
Oct 18 17:31:20 plesk dccproc[12740]: open(/var/dcc/map): No such file or
directory
Oct 18 17:31:20 plesk spamd[12732]: server started on port 783/tcp (running
version 3.0.0)
Oc
I see, so I must pass -C to spamd, not -c to spamc?
a.. Another handy option to take care of this is to pass spamd the -H option
with /etc/mail/spamassassin as the argument. This sets all helper apps'
(dccproc/pyzor/razor) homedirs to /etc/mail/spamassassin.
Where do I put the -H option, where i
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 02:12 PM 10/18/2004 +0100, Ronan wrote:
In SA 3.0, the children will pre-fork, idle as root, then it should
setuid to nobody when a spamc connects.
They will then bail back out of that setuid when they are done scanning,
so you will generally see them running as root, but
At 02:12 PM 10/18/2004 +0100, Ronan wrote:
well this is what i have after upgrading tp 3.0.0
ps -ef|grep spamd
root 23320 27167 0 11:58:56 ?0:17 /usr/local/bin/perl -T
/usr/local/bin/spamd -d -r /logs/spamd.pid
root 27167 1 0 Oct 15 ?0:02 /usr/local/bin/perl -T
/u
At 04:14 PM 10/18/2004 +0300, Justin Fielding wrote:
Hi guys. I am running SA3 via qmail-scanner. I setup razor/pyzor/dcc as
per the SA site guides. I need to tell SA to use the shared config area
for these, using:
-C /etc/mail/spamassassin
Whoooa, slow down there cowboy... -C is not to point
On Monday, October 18, 2004, 4:18:54 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 02:14:27AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> I am using SA 3.0. So I add this to a new file and name in spamcop.cf ?
>> urirhssub URIBL_JP_SURBL multi.surbl.org.A 64
>> headerURIBL_JP_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl(
Hi guys. I am running SA3 via
qmail-scanner. I setup razor/pyzor/dcc as per the SA site guides. I
need to tell SA to use the shared config area for these, using:
-C /etc/mail/spamassassin
In my qmail-scanner-queue.pl file I
have:
==
# st: fast
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:26 AM 10/18/2004 +0100, Ronan wrote:
what is the switch to set my spamd children to run as non root. Ive
looked throuhg all the docs but i must have skipped over it or i am
just in a monday mood and cant understand it...
by default spamd will *refuse* to run as root. N
At 10:26 AM 10/18/2004 +0100, Ronan wrote:
what is the switch to set my spamd children to run as non root. Ive looked
throuhg all the docs but i must have skipped over it or i am just in a
monday mood and cant understand it...
by default spamd will *refuse* to run as root. Normaly spamd setuid's
At 02:26 AM 10/18/2004 -0400, ½Bî¶ §ºµth£Ñ½ wrote:
I'm trying to whitelist domains on my server (all domains on my server are
my own domains). I have tried various ways, and I can't seem to get it to
work. I tried typing at the prompt "spamassassin whitelist_from_rcvd
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I also
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Mattia Martinello wrote:
> > Read the UPGRADE document, this is answered there:
>
> Ok, thank you!!
> And why I can't see the complete report in the message haeader?
Get rid of the "terse report" option.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BB
Read the UPGRADE document, this is answered there:
Ok, thank you!!
And why I can't see the complete report in the message haeader?
Thank you very much
Bye
Mattia.
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 13:16 +0200, Mattia Martinello wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed Spamassassin version 3.0.0 from .tar.gz on a Linux box
> running SuSE 9.1, Qmail and Qmail-scanner.
> Qmail-scanner is correctly configured to use Spamassassin and ClamAV, so
> in the mail header I can see "X-Spam-
Hi,
I installed Spamassassin version 3.0.0 from .tar.gz on a Linux box
running SuSE 9.1, Qmail and Qmail-scanner.
Qmail-scanner is correctly configured to use Spamassassin and ClamAV, so
in the mail header I can see "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=7.5".
This mean that Spamassassin is check
what is the switch to set my spamd children to run as non root. Ive
looked throuhg all the docs but i must have skipped over it or i am just
in a monday mood and cant understand it
thnaks
ronan
ps what are the preferred options / tweaks to SA3 to be done to an 'out
of the box 'version after
On Monday, October 18, 2004, 12:27:59 AM, Khalid Waheed wrote:
> The original message and test result is given below,
> I'm wondering how to improve the score of this message which is sure
> spam and listed in URIBL.
> The score of the message is always 3.2 with or without bayes.
>
Hi,
The original message and test result is given below,
I'm wondering how to improve the score of this message which is sure
spam and listed in URIBL.
The score of the message is always 3.2 with or without bayes.
Thanks,
Khalid
-- Test
Result-
Hi list! I have tried to get this to work on my server - googling for help,
trying it out, etc. - for the past month or so before I decided to go ahead
& email this mailing list.
I'm trying to whitelist domains on my server (all domains on my server are
my own domains). I have tried various wa
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:46:54AM -0300, Rodrigo A. Diaz Leven wrote:
> I finished a patch to sa-learn which adds the option
>
> -u --username Username to run sa-learn under
>
> With this option an email alias can be setup so that users can send spam or
> ham, using a virtu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sahil Tandon writes:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
>
> > That said, it sounds like your installation may be messed up
> > since init.pre was missing.
>
> init.pre wasn't missing; the .sample was there since it should be
> modified to suit the admin's needs
> So it looks like I now need to know what the appropriate 'score'
> variable are. Thanks for the clarification.
There are default scores for the 3.0 surbl rules that work fairly well for
most people.
Loren
> What's odd is it DOES take 600 seconds every time it's sent.. what's
> I am using
> bayes, so I will check on that when I get into the office on Monday..
> could be that bug...
If it happens every time on THIS mail, it probably isn't the bayes problem.
That tends to hit randomly.
The resend on
I finished a patch to sa-learn which adds the option
-u --username Username to run sa-learn under
With this option an email alias can be setup so that users can send spam or
ham, using a virtual user configuration.
Its against SpamAssassin version 3.0.0
Greetings,
Rodrigo
On Sunday, October 17, 2004, 8:04:10 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
> > That said, it sounds like your installation may be messed up
> > since init.pre was missing.
> init.pre wasn't missing; the .sample was there since it should be
> modified to suit the admin's needs and then put
>
> Sorry if those questions are too obvious to all you, but I'm
> completely
> lost - I'm unable to digest all the info available on the web. If you
> can help me to find out if I need a milter or not, and if so, which
> milter do I need, I'll continue with more questions :-)
>
> Thanks VER
Jeff Chan wrote:
> That said, it sounds like your installation may be messed up
> since init.pre was missing.
init.pre wasn't missing; the .sample was there since it should be
modified to suit the admin's needs and then put in place. *I* did
something wrong; the port/package is fine.
If the def
What's odd is it DOES take 600 seconds every time it's sent.. what's
additionally wierd is this person's mail server keeps sending the
message over and over.. once an hour... (we're working on that with
him). He's the only one in the millions of emails we handle every day
that is having this issue
On Sunday, October 17, 2004, 6:28:19 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> And it's probably worth repeating that the default (suggested) local.cf
> entries from www.surbl.org don't tickle spamassassin --lint which exits
> quietly.
Please don't use the examples in the SURBL Quickstart. I need
to revise that
Michael Parker wrote:
init.pre is part of the SA distribution, if your package/port does not
include it then it is broken and you should complain to your package
maintainer. I've forgotten all of the details but init.pre is special
because it gets loaded before all other files are processed (ie sh
Hello, i just finished converting all the SA Tests into a PHP array that is
being used in a web frontend. This permits the users to modify the scores in
the mysql db from the web.
You can get it from: http://sportal.sourceforge.net/gentests.tar.gz
The array looks like this:
$TESTS=array(
array
95 matches
Mail list logo
