Did uninstall, outlook 2002, sp3, spamassassin coach buttons still on
menu. Can't get rid of them.
Thanks jdow
Seems like you were right. My debug session was run as an
administrator but needed to be run as root. Now I just got to figure
out how my bayes database could get so sqewed.
I've got a global SPAM and HAM mailbox for our whole domain that our
users drop their false positives
From: Kris Deugau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Andersen wrote:
Mailscanner
... or any other mail-handling software...
has no business changing content.
... unless you explicitly configure it to do so. (ATTN: AVG for
Windows POP3/SMTP interface/hook authors, This Means You! Among others.)
One more question in the same way : my bayes_seen file is quite huge too
(about 160Mb)
Googling around about this I saw there was some bugs with versions prior to
3.1 but despite I'm using version 3.1.1 (a bit late on upgrading too, I'm
afraid :-\ ) I think there's something wrong here too... Is
From: Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
This happens when DNS queries timeout as the plugin defaults to
SOFTFAIL per the recommendation of the then current draft. I'm not
sure what the current experimental RFC says about it, but regardless,
we really need to assume that
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is even better than the last one:
I wonder if we are seeing warring blackhats rather than greyhats fighting
blackhats.
{^_^}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
since I will have a very tight time schedule in the next 7 weeks for a
project at the university, I will not be able to release any new
versions of FuzzyOcr, fix bugs, reply to questions or give support.
Instead of writing me, you can
Rick Macdougall writes:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Christian Purnomo wrote:
I am having so much trouble at present that some people are using my
email address to send their spam messages, in return I get hundreds and
hundres of non-delivery email + other misc reply such
Well, a few more information :
Output of sa-learn --dump magic -D :
[22420] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
[22420] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1157102359
[22420] dbg: config: score set 3 chosen.
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000
Hi
I sent a mail from my work account, which i have no control over, to my
home account which i have full control over.
I noticed that this check made up part of the score when it came in
DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.708
Can anyone tell me what that check is checking as i think i may need to
advise
I'm trying to get IO::Socket::INET6 to install since I actually use
IPv6.. But so far no luck, and I haven't found any cure when Googling
around on the subject either.
Anyone on the list who can help out? The output I get is this:
CPAN.pm: Going to build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
today I saw a strange SPF bug occuring. The original mail header was:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200])
by wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
On Friday, September 1, 2006 at 10:15:40 AM, Tom confabulated:
Hi
I sent a mail from my work account, which i have no control over, to my
home account which i have full control over.
I noticed that this check made up part of the score when it came in
DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.708
Can anyone
it's trusted_networks -- SpamAssassin doesn't know that it can
trust mail.cs.uni-sb.de.
--j.
decoder writes:
today I saw a strange SPF bug occuring. The original mail header was:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200])
by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So adding the line
trusted_networks 134.96.254.200
to local.cf will fix this problem and this mail would be recognized
correctly (as in pass SPF) ?
Thanks
Chris
Justin Mason wrote:
it's trusted_networks -- SpamAssassin doesn't know that it can
give it a try, anyway ;)
you can see what SpamAssassin thinks of the relays in the message,
using spamassassin -D -L -t message and reading the debug
lines output.
more info: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustedRelays
--j.
On 1-Sep-06, at 7:18 AM, decoder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
today I saw a strange SPF bug occuring. The original mail header was:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200])
by
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:43:36 +0200, Anders Norrbring
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get IO::Socket::INET6 to install since I actually use
IPv6.. But so far no luck, and I haven't found any cure when Googling
around on the subject either.
Anyone on the list who can help out? The output
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gino Cerullo wrote:
On 1-Sep-06, at 7:18 AM, decoder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
today I saw a strange SPF bug occuring. The original mail header was:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from
Nigel Frankcom skrev:
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:43:36 +0200, Anders Norrbring
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get IO::Socket::INET6 to install since I actually use
IPv6.. But so far no luck, and I haven't found any cure when Googling
around on the subject either.
Anyone on the list who
Will Duff wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been working with SpamAssassin for the course of Google's Summer
of Code to create 'SpamAssassin Coach' - an add-in available for
Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook. The purpose of the add-in
is to allow users to report spam and ham to SpamAssassin
Chris wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 7:54 pm, David B Funk wrote:
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:02 PM 8/30/2006, you wrote:
Check at the top of this E-trade Phishing site:
http://196.1.161.115/e/t/user/login/
I
On 1-Sep-06, at 9:12 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Chris wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 7:54 pm, David B Funk wrote:
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:02 PM 8/30/2006, you wrote:
Check at the top of this E-trade Phishing site:
Title: RE: Hacked E-Trade Phishing Site
-Original Message-
From: Gino Cerullo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 9:25 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hacked E-Trade Phishing Site
On 1-Sep-06, at 9:12 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200])
by wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
k7T8rU6P012050;
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:53:30 +0200
Received: from mail-eur1.microsoft.com
Bowie Bailey writes:
Will Duff wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been working with SpamAssassin for the course of Google's Summer
of Code to create 'SpamAssassin Coach' - an add-in available for
Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook. The purpose of the add-in
is to allow users to report
Ramprasad writes:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200])
by wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
k7T8rU6P012050;
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:53:30 +0200
Received: from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ramprasad wrote:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from
mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200]) by
wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
id k7T8rU6P012050; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:53:30 +0200 Received:
RE: SpamAssassin Coach - Outlook/Thunderbird Plugin
Any chance that an Outlook Express version might be forthcoming?
I know that many of the Unix admins on this list hate any thing Microsoft
produces and probably especially Outlook Express... but the fact is that a
very large percentage of
Rob McEwen writes:
RE: SpamAssassin Coach - Outlook/Thunderbird Plugin
Any chance that an Outlook Express version might be forthcoming?
I know that many of the Unix admins on this list hate any thing Microsoft
produces and probably especially Outlook Express... but the fact is that a
Rob McEwen wrote:
RE: SpamAssassin Coach - Outlook/Thunderbird Plugin
Any chance that an Outlook Express version might be forthcoming?
I know that many of the Unix admins on this list hate any thing Microsoft
produces and probably especially Outlook Express... but the fact is that a
very
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:44:03PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Any chance that an Outlook Express version might be forthcoming?
in my experience, the problem is that OE mangles the message too much.
Does OE even allow for plugins?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
If firefighters fight fire, and
in my experience, the problem is that OE mangles the message too much.
I disagree... but don't take my word for it... double check this yourself...
When you are viewing a message in Outlook Express, if you right click on
the message, click properties from the drop-down, click the details tab,
on 'forget', did you mean for these to product different header lines?
TELL SPAMC/1.3
Content-length: 2214
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-class: spam
Set: local
TELL SPAMC/1.3
Content-length: 3245
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remove: local
or is the Message-class: ham missing?
(I don't
At 05:54 01-09-2006, decoder wrote:
This is no real forwarding, but all mail for us gets received by that
server first, and this server passes it to us. This is a common
structure for a bigger mail setup. The trusted_networks option solved
my problems, but it should definetly be included in the
Are there any SA methods that allow verification of the ‘sender’ of an email ?
I am aware of SPF which can confirm that a host at ip address x.x.x.x is
authorized to send mail as from domain “A”, but how about a means to
confirm that [EMAIL PROTECTED] actually is a real user before
decoder wrote:
The trusted_networks option solved my problems, but it should
definetly be included in the wiki somewhere.
How about this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
The common symptoms of a broken Trust path include:
* ALL_TRUSTED matching spam email from the
On Friday 01 September 2006 16:14, Ramprasad took the opportunity to say:
This is no real forwarding, but all mail for us gets received by that
server first, and this server passes it to us. This is a common
structure for a bigger mail setup. The trusted_networks option solved
my problems,
On Friday 01 September 2006 13:41, decoder took the opportunity to say:
So adding the line
trusted_networks 134.96.254.200
to local.cf will fix this problem and this mail would be recognized
correctly (as in pass SPF) ?
If 134.96.254.200 is the MX for your domain, then it should even be in
On Thu, August 31, 2006 05:41, Rick Roe wrote:
like there should be a simpler, more automatic way to do this. Am I
missing something?
in postfix main.cf
smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = yes
In exim.conf, somewhere in acl_check_rcpt:
require verify = sender
**warning message from newbie**I've inherited an installation of SA version 3.0.1 on an OS X server (10.4) and it does not seem to be working properly. It's running with Communigate as the mail server. It seems to be scanning the messages, it is adding the headers like this:
Wow... This mail has been sitting in my draft folder for a while, so I
figured I ought to get it out.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:24:04PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
I got nothing but love for you, so here goes ;) ..
:)
Chris! I'm surprised to hear you spreading this misinformation.
It is 3.1.4.
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:32:37PM -0700, Albert Poon wrote:
I know I don't need setting 0777 on them, and 0666 is fine for me. But
for
the auto_whitelist, I can't set to 0666, it only turns to 0640.
What version are you running? There were some
Hrm. In that case, I'd say open a BZ ticket
(http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/) and we'll see about reproducing/fixing
it.
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:11:24PM -0700, Albert Poon wrote:
It is 3.1.4.
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:32:37PM -0700, Albert Poon wrote:
I
Thanks all for the already valuable feedback and support! To answer
some questions:
On 8/31/06, Doc Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Couple of commments. right clicking on a message doesn't give any option
to report as ham or spam I think this would be a valuable option.
Secondly, I use
in my experience, the problem is that OE mangles the message too much.
Eh? I think you are thinking of Outlook. OE doesn't seem to touch the
message, or at least the 'view message source' window can accurately
reconstruct it. (Which is easy to get to, unlike Outlook itself where it is
I don't believe OE has an API accessible like LookOut and Thunderbird do.
It doesn't. But that doesn't mean its impossible to do, just harder.
The PGP stuff has a plugin for OE that allows it to sign messages after
you compose them, adn to encrypt and decrypt messages. It also adds menus
-Original Message-
From: Will Duff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 6:40 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin Coach - Outlook/Thunderbird Plugin
Thanks all for the already valuable feedback and support! To
answer some
Title: Re: SpamAssassin Coach - Outlook/Thunderbird Plugin
Justin Mason wrote:
Bowie Bailey writes:
Will Duff wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been working with SpamAssassin for the course of
Google's Summer
of Code to create 'SpamAssassin Coach' - an add-in available
for
this is really promising, but i think it sort of points out some
deficiencies in the current state of handling sa things from the
client side.
i'm wondering if it would make sense to create a separate learner
server that deals with this stuff, with this server calling the
training
I've been testing OpenDNS tonight vice using Earthlinks DNS nameservers.
Looking at my hourly syslog snip, about half way through my NANAS run I
noticed the below entries. First of all, what are these entries telling
me? Secondly, if this is an error in the uridnsbl plug-in is it possibly
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 10:22:42PM -0500, Chris wrote:
First of all, what are these entries telling me? Secondly, if this
is an error in the uridnsbl plug-in is it possibly caused by the change
in nameservers?
The error is saying that it's looking for a 127/8 result, but it gets
208.67.219.40
Although not yet definite, I am likely switching ISPs starting next
Friday. It is my intent to keep the Comcast account active for about 4
weeks as a fall-back if the new ISP doesn't work out.
However, this means antidrug.cf will be moving, and at some point after
I shut down the account the web
53 matches
Mail list logo
