Hi,
I'd like to setup an email account in cPanel so that I receive *all*
incoming emails that contain a specific word in the subject line.
It would be critical that I get 100% of the emails sent to me (that contain
a specific word in the subject line), and that none of them get trapped by a
spam
On 07/12/2009 22:16, JaredDetroit wrote:
> Hi, I don't know if I'm posting the right type of content here but I'm sure
> I'll find out. I'm trying to create a newsletter and I keep receiving the
> following spam assassin scores:
>
> I'm sending out a basic HTML newsletter with a pdf attachment t
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, JaredDetroit wrote:
I really appreciate any help.
We'd be most able (and willing) to help if we had an actual example
message to look at. If you can post a complete scored message, including
_all_ headers, to a website like pastebin or to a website you control, and
send
Some good news... possibly.
I finally complained to ARIN (for the 4th time) that the contact information
for the Inktomi address blocks was incorrect, as Inktomi hasn't existed as a
corporate (and legal) entity for some time... it was acquired by Yahoo! 3 years
ago, and their address blocks hav
Hi, I don't know if I'm posting the right type of content here but I'm sure
I'll find out. I'm trying to create a newsletter and I keep receiving the
following spam assassin scores:
I'm sending out a basic HTML newsletter with a pdf attachment to subscribers
in Aweber. I've searched extensively
i spose we are concerned about "renames" of rules although there are pry not
many of those...
the main concern would be duplicate rule(s) functionality based upon the
long lifespan of 3.2.5 and ummm sharing on the list and otherwise...
could be same function with different name etc
all will com
On 07/12/2009 19:13, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I have yet to find ANY use for SPF. And SPF causes nothing but problems.
You can't have been looking very hard then. I whitelist mail from this
list and spam-l with these simple SPF rules in my user_prefs:
whitelist_from_spf *...@*.apache.org
whitelist_f
R-Elists wrote:
> perkel wrote:
> I have yet to find ANY use for SPF. And
SPF causes nothing but problems.
Marc,
why nothing but problems?
is a lot of your system "mail
forward" orientated?
care to elaborate w/o going into
the same old SPF diatribe?
On Monday 07 December 2009 20:18:29 Alex wrote:
> > - added or updated many rules; incomplete list in no particular order:
> > vbounce, lotsa_money, muchmoney, image spam, fill_this_form,
> > FreeMail...snipped
> >
> > Q1)is there a location that shows the "complete list" at this time?
I doubt an
> perkel wrote:
> I have yet to find ANY use for SPF. And SPF causes nothing but problems.
Marc,
why nothing but problems?
is a lot of your system "mail forward" orientated?
care to elaborate w/o going into the same old SPF diatribe?
maybe there is something useful you havent had the
>
> This should be fairly easy to do: configure SA with the
> language(s) you will accept and the ratio of misspellings to
> total words that you'll accept as meaning 'unwanted language'
> after numbers and HTML tags have been excluded from the
> check. Apply the test to the whole body of a
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
What are you asking? Obviously 'unsolicited' is NOT 'wanted', so
therefore
by using the word 'wanted' I am by definition meaning *solicited*. That
means somone ASKED for the mail. REQUESTED it via an
opt-in mechanism, with c
Hi,
> - added or updated many rules; incomplete list in no particular order:
> vbounce, lotsa_money, muchmoney, image spam, fill_this_form,
> FreeMail...snipped
>
> Q1)is there a location that shows the "complete list" at this time?
I also have questions similar to these about the pending releas
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i think it could be added to freemail.pm to test if sender domain have
spf or dkim and if no spf and or no dkim consider it as a freemail
domain ?
On 07.12.09 12:23, Charles G
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> i think it could be added to freemail.pm to test if sender domain have
>> spf or dkim and if no spf and or no dkim consider it as a freemail
>> domain ?
On 07.12.09 12:23, Charles Gregory wrote:
> Nope. I run an ISP and basically my SPF amounts to
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Per Jessen wrote:
>> Won't customers dealing with such a company will have whitelisted them
>> long ago?
>
> For every 'mark' that is out there, stupidly entering their e-mail and
> then getting a bunch of ads for which they didn't realize they had given
> permission, ther
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 08:55 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
Except for very short messages I would think that if you spell checked
the message in several languages and found that 80% was spelled
correctly that you have a match. You wouldn't have to check every
la
Please, could you configure your MUA to quote, instead of colouring?
HTML mail sucks.
On 07.12.09 08:55, Marc Perkel wrote:
>Any chance someone might be interested in a radical redesign? I think
>language exclusion would be an extremely effective spam deterrent as email
>in a language
On Dec 7, 2009, at 12:12 PM, "R-Elists" wrote:
in the post there was mention of
- added or updated many rules; incomplete list in no particular order:
vbounce, lotsa_money, muchmoney, image spam, fill_this_form,
FreeMail...snipped
Q1)is there a location that shows the "complete list" at th
Charles Gregory wrote:
> There's a need. A real genuine need for services like Habeas.
It almost certainly depends on your environment - like my numbers
showed, over four months, I only had 45 emails that would have gone
down the drain without Habeas. In comparison to what was processed
that i
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 08:55 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
> Except for very short messages I would think that if you spell checked
> the message in several languages and found that 80% was spelled
> correctly that you have a match. You wouldn't have to check every
> language, just start with some com
Thank you.
--
Robert Lopez
Unix Systems Administrator
Central New Mexico Community College (CNM)
525 Buena Vista SE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106
in the post there was mention of
- added or updated many rules; incomplete list in no particular order:
vbounce, lotsa_money, muchmoney, image spam, fill_this_form,
FreeMail...snipped
Q1)is there a location that shows the "complete list" at this time?
if not,
Q2) will there be a complete li
>
> Nonsense. I had to score this list -2000 just to keep it from
> scoring so darn high that it was hitting the 'automatic'
> rejection at the SMTP gate before any of my whitelists could
> function. Sometimes legit mail scores high. A 'truly clean
> company' should be permitted to enjoy a 'w
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Alex wrote:
> Yes, a few here too. Can you explain your rules?
Nothing magical but I'll send you a response offlist.
> Why is your score 6.0?
Not my score. It is a customer's score. They can set them at anything they
want (well anything 3 and above).
Chris
What I call spam you may call ham. What I call ham you might call spam.
One ring to control them all er one list to filter them all inherently
cannot
work, especially when people change their minds and decide to
"unsubscribe with extreme prejudice."
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "L
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
A truly clean company that always uses opt-in and never spams has
nothing to fear from any anti-spam measure.
Nonsense. I had to score this list -2000 just to keep it from scoring so
darn high that it was hitting the 'automatic' rejection at th
Hi,
> Well I'm not sure about "new" but the image spam seems to be back on again
> after a long absence:
>
> http://pastebin.com/d6d840f09
Yes, a few here too. Can you explain your rules? I haven't seen some
of these before:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_50,
DYN_
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, R-Elists wrote:
Nyet, nyet, nyet... we would *not* all live with the occassional "opt-in"
request from Return Path.
frankly, nothing against them, yet if an organization really needs Return
Path to get their email through to mailboxes without rejection, then doesn't
the origi
On 7-Dec-2009, at 09:55, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Any chance someone might be interested in a radical redesign? I think
> language exclusion would be an extremely effective spam deterrent as email in
> a language you don't speak is definitely spam.
Erm… not necessarily. As a general rule, this mig
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i think it could be added to freemail.pm to test if sender domain have
spf or dkim and if no spf and or no dkim consider it as a freemail
domain ?
Nope. I run an ISP and basically my SPF amounts to 'neutral' because my
users can send mail from any acc
On 7-Dec-2009, at 09:03, Charles Gregory wrote:
> There's a need. A real genuine need for services like Habeas. But they need
> to be *very* well managed and policed. And it seems, from some complaints,
> that this is not happening
How a service like HABEAS needs to work is that 1) It keeps
Well I'm not sure about "new" but the image spam seems to be back on again
after a long absence:
http://pastebin.com/d6d840f09
Same issues/filtering techniques as before.
These do seem to be doing a pretty good job of clobbering Bayes filtering
though.
Chris
Matt Kettler wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm wondering if the language detection in TextCat can be improved.
Here's the situation.
It appears that TextCat was designed to be inclusive. You list the
languages you want and it returns many possibilities so as not to
trigger unwanted
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Per Jessen wrote:
Won't customers dealing with such a company will have whitelisted them
long ago?
For every 'mark' that is out there, stupidly entering their e-mail and
then getting a bunch of ads for which they didn't realize they had given
permission, there are people t
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
What are you asking? Obviously 'unsolicited' is NOT 'wanted', so therefore
by using the word 'wanted' I am by definition meaning *solicited*. That
means somone ASKED for the mail. REQUESTED it via an
opt-in mechanism, with confirmation.
I will then
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:00 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 12/7/2009 3:42 PM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > http://pastebin.com/m7c1c17d
> >
> > Interesting insofar as it appears to be whitelisted??? Is this some kind
> > of well known US email or hosting service?
> >
> > Sane missed it
On 12/7/2009 3:42 PM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m7c1c17d
Interesting insofar as it appears to be whitelisted??? Is this some kind
of well known US email or hosting service?
Sane missed it, the dnsbl's have missed it and the content filtering has
missed it. So it's a tast
http://pastebin.com/m7c1c17d
Interesting insofar as it appears to be whitelisted??? Is this some kind
of well known US email or hosting service?
Sane missed it, the dnsbl's have missed it and the content filtering has
missed it. So it's a tasty morsel of spam :-)
39 matches
Mail list logo
