SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.10.0
Ubuntu 8.10
I configured some addresses to be -9.0 or even -20.0 on Amavis (there were
some addresses with -3.0, from default config on Ubuntu), does that make it
possible that SpamAssassin will mark some emails with a
ram wrote:
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com
mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
ram wrote:
i still see this errors
May 5 10:28:03.484 [3153] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule SHORTCIRCUIT
May 5
Lauro Costa G. Borges wrote:
I configured some addresses to be -9.0 or even -20.0 on Amavis (there
were some addresses with -3.0, from default config on Ubuntu), does
that make it possible that SpamAssassin will mark some emails with a
pontuation higher than they should be, or were in the
On May 8, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Yahoo's own DKIM implementation? header signing?
Neither. It's related to their anti-spam system, but not intended for end-user
parsing.
would adding 1 point for each 1K of header length help?
Interesting idea! I don't know the precise
No. It is logically impossible, that an additional negative score
*causes* the FPs.
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 21:31 +0800, Lauro Costa G. Borges wrote:
I configured some addresses to be -9.0 or even -20.0 on Amavis (there
were some addresses with -3.0, from default config on Ubuntu), does
Err,
