i face false positives where the links are just facebook.com with the
http-prefix in front and NOT com between the http-prefix and the real
facebook domain
the domain with com in front is indeed on both URIBL but it just don#t
exist in the messages at all - why does SA extract the domains
On 5/11/2015 9:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
stripped down and anonymized sample attached
the real bad thing is that the part triggering the URIBL rules wrongly
is the quote of the signature from the message replied to
Am 11.05.2015 um 15:13 schrieb Reindl Harald:
i face false positives where
On 5/11/2015 9:42 AM, Alex Regan wrote:
Hi,
I have a fp that was passed through thomsonreuters, hitting
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, receiving -5 points, from an obvious hacked account.
http://pastebin.com/5LYS7s2v
This is with v3.4.1, but an older bayes database, so perhaps it needs
to be rebuilt.
On 5/11/2015 9:13 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i face false positives where the links are just facebook.com with
the http-prefix in front and NOT com between the http-prefix and the
real facebook domain
the domain with com in front is indeed on both URIBL but it just
don#t exist in the messages
Am 11.05.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 5/11/2015 9:13 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i face false positives where the links are just facebook.com with
the http-prefix in front and NOT com between the http-prefix and the
real facebook domain
the domain with com in front is indeed on
Hi,
I have a fp that was passed through thomsonreuters, hitting
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, receiving -5 points, from an obvious hacked account.
http://pastebin.com/5LYS7s2v
This is with v3.4.1, but an older bayes database, so perhaps it needs to
be rebuilt. Even with BAYES_99, it still wouldn't have
Am 11.05.2015 um 15:42 schrieb Alex Regan:
I have a fp that was passed through thomsonreuters, hitting
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, receiving -5 points, from an obvious hacked account.
http://pastebin.com/5LYS7s2v
This is with v3.4.1, but an older bayes database, so perhaps it needs to
be rebuilt. Even
W dniu 06.05.2015 o 14:46, Kevin A. McGrail pisze:
On 5/5/2015 3:56 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
W dniu 2015-05-05 o 21:47, Kevin A. McGrail pisze:
On 5/5/2015 3:38 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
I'm thinking about removing all Received headers from email except
added
by my MTA, storing it,
Hello Reindl,
Monday, May 11, 2015, 2:57:57 PM, you wrote:
RH complain at dnswl.org
Don't complain, report it and the listing will then be reviewed
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpKsVGuBiYkY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
