On Sun, 24 Jan 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.01.2016 um 20:45 schrieb Shawn Bakhtiar:
On Jan 24, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 00:07 +0530, Sarang Shrivastava wrote:
I am just a newbie who has started using SA. Someone on the mailing
list suggested me t
On 2016-01-20 22:21, Marc Perkel wrote:
Here is a list of 3494938 words and phrases used in the subject line
of SPAM and never seen in the subject line of HAM
http://www.junkemailfilter.com/data/subject-spam.txt
I thought I'd take you up on this using a combination of my corpus, and
the othe
Am 24.01.2016 um 21:54 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 20:52 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
* the point is that he is analyzing *local* files
NOW we know that. But, the OP's first post made it clear he hadn't even
read the manpage
yes, but se my response 15 minutes before yours
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 20:52 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> * the point is that he is analyzing *local* files
>
NOW we know that. But, the OP's first post made it clear he hadn't even
read the manpage or he'd have realised that SA's results are output by
adding headers to the message. Also, he clearl
Am 24.01.2016 um 20:45 schrieb Shawn Bakhtiar:
On Jan 24, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 00:07 +0530, Sarang Shrivastava wrote:
I am just a newbie who has started using SA. Someone on the mailing
list suggested me to use -D option. So if this option is for
de
> On Jan 24, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 00:07 +0530, Sarang Shrivastava wrote:
>> I am just a newbie who has started using SA. Someone on the mailing
>> list suggested me to use -D option. So if this option is for
>> debugging then how do we classify it
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 00:07 +0530, Sarang Shrivastava wrote:
> I am just a newbie who has started using SA. Someone on the mailing
> list suggested me to use -D option. So if this option is for
> debugging then how do we classify it ?
>
You don't classify it: that's SA's job. It only scores mess
Am 24.01.2016 um 20:09 schrieb Sarang Shrivastava:
Will take into consideration your advice from the next time.
WTF? respond to the list AND ONLY to the list
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+use+a+mailing-list
* set up spamd
* spamc -R -l --socket /run/spamassassin/spamassassin.sock <
Am 24.01.2016 um 19:12 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 23:05 +0530, Sarang Shrivastava wrote:
Jan 25 03:30:46.222 [8919] dbg: netset: cache trusted_networks
hits/attempts: 9/11, 81.8 %
What does this mean actually ? Does anyone knows how to read the
ouput
given by spamassassin
Am 24.01.2016 um 19:37 schrieb Sarang Shrivastava:
I am just a newbie who has started using SA. Someone on the mailing list
suggested me to use -D option. So if this option is for debugging then
how do we classify it ?
please don't top-post and press reply-all on mailing-lists!
don't write s
Well, it looks like we just barely missed the minimum on the ham corpus,
so there wasn't a weekly rule generation; this means rule updates are
blocked for another week.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a
I am just a newbie who has started using SA. Someone on the mailing list
suggested me to use -D option. So if this option is for debugging then how
do we classify it ?
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.01.2016 um 19:25 schrieb Sarang Shrivastava:
>
>> I just down
Am 24.01.2016 um 19:25 schrieb Sarang Shrivastava:
I just downloaded a dataset of spam and hams from the net and fed one of
the training file as input to the SA. What i want from it is to classify
it as a spam or a ham when i run the command spamassassin -D <
TEST_0.eml
and why do you use
On 01/24/2016 10:06 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 01/24/2016 06:38 PM, Don deJuan wrote:
>> header __XEXAMPLE_ABC X-Example ~= /^ABC$/
>
> should use =~ and NOT ~=
*face palm* ugh has not been my weekend on the small details. Thanks!
I just downloaded a dataset of spam and hams from the net and fed one of
the training file as input to the SA. What i want from it is to classify it
as a spam or a ham when i run the command spamassassin -D < TEST_0.eml
And this particular thing i could not found. Any help ?
On Sun, Jan 24, 2
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 23:05 +0530, Sarang Shrivastava wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I ran the following command
>
> spamassassin -D < TEST_0.eml
>
> this was the last line of the output
>
> Jan 25 03:30:46.222 [8919] dbg: netset: cache trusted_networks
> hits/attempts: 9/11, 81.8 %
>
> What does
On 01/24/2016 06:38 PM, Don deJuan wrote:
header __XEXAMPLE_ABC X-Example ~= /^ABC$/
should use =~ and NOT ~=
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016, Don deJuan wrote:
Jan 24 11:49:58.515 [13952] warn: lint: 1 issues detected, please rerun
with debug enabled for more information
Not sure why it is telling me its having issues with delimiters, here is
how I set mine up
header __XEXAMPLE_ABC X-Example ~= /^ABC$/
Apologie
On 01/23/2016 08:38 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, Don deJuan wrote:
>
>> On 01/23/2016 04:37 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>>
>>> The rules will be different if you want to score "the header is
>>> present but it does not contain specific text", which is one possible
>>> way to interpret
Hey guys,
I ran the following command
spamassassin -D < TEST_0.eml
this was the last line of the output
Jan 25 03:30:46.222 [8919] dbg: netset: cache trusted_networks
hits/attempts: 9/11, 81.8 %
What does this mean actually ? Does anyone knows how to read the ouput
given by spamassassin af
20 matches
Mail list logo
