Re: Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-05 Thread RW
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:50:08 +0100 Thomas Anderson wrote: > Thanks for all the informative replies. > > For the short term, I will just whitelist the address in question. > > Perhaps my setup is crap. I don't have enough SPAM to train bayes. In > the past two years, I have gotten maybe, 10? spam

Re: Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-05 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020, Axb wrote: On 11/5/20 4:31 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 5 Nov 2020, RW wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:48:48 -0500 Bill Cole wrote: On 4 Nov 2020, at 13:31, Thomas Anderson wrote: *  1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE In addition

Re: Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-05 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020, Thomas Anderson wrote: Thanks for all the informative replies. For the short term, I will just whitelist the address in question. Perhaps my setup is crap. I don't have enough SPAM to train bayes. In the past two years, I have gotten maybe, 10? spam emails. Basically, the

Re: Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-05 Thread Thomas Anderson
Thanks for all the informative replies. For the short term, I will just whitelist the address in question. Perhaps my setup is crap. I don't have enough SPAM to train bayes. In the past two years, I have gotten maybe, 10? spam emails. Basically, the server is for myself and a couple family

Re: Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-04 Thread Axb
On 11/5/20 4:31 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 5 Nov 2020, RW wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:48:48 -0500 Bill Cole wrote: On 4 Nov 2020, at 13:31, Thomas Anderson wrote: *  1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE In addition to what John noted, that one

Re: Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-04 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020, RW wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:48:48 -0500 Bill Cole wrote: On 4 Nov 2020, at 13:31, Thomas Anderson wrote: * 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE In addition to what John noted, that one looks like a candidate for constructing

Re: Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-04 Thread RW
On Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:48:48 -0500 Bill Cole wrote: > On 4 Nov 2020, at 13:31, Thomas Anderson wrote: > > > * 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but > > no X-MimeOLE > > In addition to what John noted, that one looks like a candidate for > constructing an exception.

Re: Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-04 Thread Bill Cole
On 4 Nov 2020, at 13:31, Thomas Anderson wrote: * 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE In addition to what John noted, that one looks like a candidate for constructing an exception. MISSING_MIMEOLE already has a number of exceptions based on the fact that

Re: Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-04 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020, Thomas Anderson wrote: Hello, Email from my child's school is being identified as SPAM, but it's from his teacher. Here is the  X-SPAM-Report: X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) * [194.25.134.21 listed in

Email coming in being identified as SPAM

2020-11-04 Thread Thomas Anderson
Hello, Email from my child's school is being identified as SPAM, but it's from his teacher. Here is the  X-SPAM-Report: X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) * [194.25.134.21 listed in wl.mailspike.net] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender