On 11/04/2018, 22:57, "Alex" wrote:
> The envelope sender is
>
3ue3owhmjamkzhabyuuhahsbe.qpzhvnthps.jvtytilzadlzalyu@trix.bounces.google.com
> and the SPF-relevant relay IP is 209.85.223.199, so SPF passes. That's
good
> enough for def_whitelist_auth.
trix.bounces.google
Hi,
>> Hi, this message seems suspicious to me (appears to be some type of
>> survey), but I don't understand how it was whitelisted when google.com
>> is not listed among def_whitelist_from_dkim (or at least shouldn't be)
>
> Note that google.com has historically been reserved for Google corporat
On 11 Apr 2018, at 15:28 (-0400), Alex wrote:
Hi, this message seems suspicious to me (appears to be some type of
survey), but I don't understand how it was whitelisted when google.com
is not listed among def_whitelist_from_dkim (or at least shouldn't be)
Note that google.com has historically
Alex skrev den 2018-04-11 21:28:
Hi, this message seems suspicious to me (appears to be some type of
survey), but I don't understand how it was whitelisted when google.com
is not listed among def_whitelist_from_dkim (or at least shouldn't be)
https://pastebin.com/raw/h1370F1F
I'd appreciate any
On 04/11/2018 02:28 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi, this message seems suspicious to me (appears to be some type of
survey), but I don't understand how it was whitelisted when google.com
is not listed among def_whitelist_from_dkim (or at least shouldn't be)
https://pastebin.com/raw/h1370F1F
I'd appreciate
Hi, this message seems suspicious to me (appears to be some type of
survey), but I don't understand how it was whitelisted when google.com
is not listed among def_whitelist_from_dkim (or at least shouldn't be)
https://pastebin.com/raw/h1370F1F
I'd appreciate any clarification on what's going on h