On 5/30/2016 10:35 AM, Nick Howitt wrote:
Just for a bit of closure, it looks like when you use amavisd-new with
SA, it is amavisd-new and not SA which is adding the X-Spam headers.
In /etc/amavisd/api.conf there is a parameter, $sa_tag_level_deflt,
defaulted to -99, below which no X-Spam
Am 30.05.2016 um 16:35 schrieb Nick Howitt:
Just for a bit of closure, it looks like when you use amavisd-new with
SA, it is amavisd-new and not SA which is adding the X-Spam headers. In
/etc/amavisd/api.conf there is a parameter, $sa_tag_level_deflt,
defaulted to -99, below which no X-Spam
Just for a bit of closure, it looks like when you use amavisd-new with
SA, it is amavisd-new and not SA which is adding the X-Spam headers. In
/etc/amavisd/api.conf there is a parameter, $sa_tag_level_deflt,
defaulted to -99, below which no X-Spam headers are set. If you
whitelist, you start
On 26/05/2016 13:19, Nick Howitt wrote:
OK, I've been heavily shot at for my set up which is totally
irrelevant to the question I posed and not a pleasant experience. Is
there any possibility of some help with the problem I posted about?
Matus snuck in the most likely answer a while back
Am 26.05.2016 um 14:19 schrieb Nick Howitt:
I'm finding it hard here. I am using preconfigured distro where Postfix,
amavis and SA are all supplied as a working set up as is dnsmasq. There
is no expectation that the users need to "go under the hood" to fix or
change things. In my case I've
OK, I've been heavily shot at for my set up which is totally
irrelevant to the question I posed and not a pleasant experience. Is
there any possibility of some help with the problem I posted about?
Matus snuck in the most likely answer a while back - message size.
In Amavis it look as if the
Am 26.05.2016 um 12:22 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 2016-05-26 10:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
how often where you asked to stop post HTML mails?
and yes, rules are made by people asked for help
I try
lol - so you don't see the message you compose before hit "send"?
but I use multiple machines
On 2016-05-26 10:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
how often where you asked to stop post HTML mails?
and yes, rules are made by people asked for help
I try, but I use multiple machines and don't always remember which I've
set explicitly to use plain text. In theory I've set up something in the
how often where you asked to stop post HTML mails?
and yes, rules are made by people asked for help
Am 26.05.2016 um 08:17 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.05.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Nick Howitt:
and what is the problem run a local unbound on port 1053 and
On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 25.05.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Nick Howitt:
and what is the problem run a local
unbound on port 1053 and just add
"dns_server [127.0.0.1]:1053" to
Am 25.05.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Nick Howitt:
and what is the problem run a local unbound on port 1053 and just add
"dns_server [127.0.0.1]:1053" to your SA-configuration when one thinks
he is capable to run his own servers?
I've tried looking and failed. Any chance of pointing me to where this
>I used the "Authoritative, validating, recursive caching DNS (example
>2)" section of this guide: https://calomel.org/unbound_dns.html but
>omitted the forward-zone, local-zone and local-data sections and did a
>couple of other parameters differently.
PowerDNS Recursor is very easy to install
thing else. Thanks for mentioning unbound
I had never heard of this before.
From: Nick Howitt <n...@howitts.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:11:24 AM
To: David Jones; SA-Users
Subject: Re: Odd results when using whitelisting
This thread is so fra
. Thanks for mentioning unbound
I had never heard of this before.
From: Nick Howitt <n...@howitts.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:11:24 AM
To: David Jones; SA-Users
Subject: Re: Odd results when using whitelisting
This thread is so fragmented
and what is the problem run a local unbound on port 1053 and just add
"dns_server [127.0.0.1]:1053" to your SA-configuration when one thinks
he is capable to run his own servers?
I've tried looking and failed. Any chance of pointing me to where this
is documented?
.
On 25/05/2016 17:52, David Jones wrote:
From: Bill Cole <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:09 AM
To: SA-Users
Subject: Re: Odd results when using whitelisting
On 24 May 2016, at 15:58, David Jones wrote:
Dnsmasq is a very powerful DNS server
I
>From: Bill Cole <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:09 AM
>To: SA-Users
>Subject: Re: Odd results when using whitelisting
>On 24 May 2016, at 15:58, David Jones wrote:
>> Dnsmasq is a very powerful DNS server
I meant that it
On 24 May 2016, at 15:58, David Jones wrote:
Dnsmasq is a very powerful DNS server
LOL. Its man page (see
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/docs/dnsmasq-man.html) opens with
the implied admission that it isn't even a "real" DNS server: which it
isn't. It's a bloatware DNS proxy. For
On Tue, 24 May 2016 19:58:32 +
David Jones wrote:
> Dnsmasq is a very powerful DNS server so I am sure it can be
> configured to do full recursive lookups but this is not a common
> configuration for dnsmasq.
This has come-up before and it can't.
On 24.05.16 17:49, Nick Howitt wrote:
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS derivative) and I
believe it is invoked by amavis-new. I have a whitelist line in local.cf:
Please, don't use html mail in mailing lists.
From peacocks-mail.com I get:
Return-Path:
On 2016-05-24 21:40, Nick Howitt wrote:
Ok, but how does it help me? From what I've read it seems dnsmasq can
only do recursion. If I keep dnsmasq then I would need to point it to
another iterative DNS resolver running on my box such as PowerDNS or
BIND rather than to OpenDNS or have I
On 2016-05-24 22:33, Nick Howitt wrote:
/etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 127.0.0.1
thats all, make sure it does not change on boot
I've already got it (but the man pages says it ignores it!) but then
I've got OpenDNS after.
one more fail then, you must not use opendns
else you will see
Am 24.05.2016 um 22:34 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 21:30, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
will fail with uribl.com and others
Oh bunk :-(
i explained magnitude times *why* this is
Am 24.05.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
will fail with uribl.com and others
tell me something new or why do you think i did put the headline "THAT
IS A BULLSHIT SETUP ON A
Am 24.05.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 20:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and
On 24/05/2016 21:30, Benny Pedersen
wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
On 24/05/2016 21:28, Benny Pedersen
wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:40, Nick Howitt wrote:
Ok, but how does it help me? From what
I've read it seems dnsmasq can
only do recursion. If I keep dnsmasq then I would
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
will fail with uribl.com and others
On 2016-05-24 21:40, Nick Howitt wrote:
Ok, but how does it help me? From what I've read it seems dnsmasq can
only do recursion. If I keep dnsmasq then I would need to point it to
another iterative DNS resolver running on my box such as PowerDNS or
BIND rather than to OpenDNS or have I
On 24/05/2016 20:53, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:44 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
*never* use a forwarind/ISP nameserver for a inbound MX
> If I understand you, I don't. I have my own domain and my mx record points to
> my dyndns FQDN
What you mentioned above is hosting your own domain's DNS to the Internet and
has nothing to do with how your ClearOS server is resolving it's
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:44 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
blocked. My
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
blocked. My mailserver is my gateway and only runs dnsmasq
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
blocked. My mailserver is my gateway and only runs dnsmasq rather than
bind and I am only a home user, so, from your link, I fall under the low
volume
On 24/05/2016 18:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Nick Howitt:
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS
derivative) and
I believe it is invoked by
Am 24.05.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Nick Howitt:
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS derivative) and
I believe it is invoked by amavis-new. I have a whitelist line in local.cf:
whitelist_from *@avivaemail.co.uk @m.avivaemail.co.uk *@tomtom.com
*@dpd.co.uk
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS derivative)
and I believe it is invoked by amavis-new. I have a whitelist line
in local.cf:
whitelist_from *@avivaemail.co.uk @m.avivaemail.co.uk
*@tomtom.com *@dpd.co.uk *@clearos.com *@peacocks-mail.com
38 matches
Mail list logo
