On 5/12/19 9:29 PM, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> On 2019-05-11 23:25, David Jones wrote:
>
> I don't have anything nearly so elaborate. But then I don't have the
> spam volume either.
>
That's fine. Just wanted to point out that "one size doesn't fit all"
for other readers on this list. The
Shot for sharing David !!!
Regards
Brent Clark
P.s. I wonder what other tricks you have up your sleeve that you would
be willing to share. :)
On 2019/05/10 16:48, David Jones wrote:
On 5/10/19 1:52 AM, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Hi Kurt,
On the contrary, most spam i see is valid DKIM
On 2019-05-11 23:25, David Jones wrote:
Is this for a single mailbox? If that is the case, then it's fine to
make a decision like that for a single mailbox. For those of us
running
mail filtering plaforms for customers, this would be a very bad rule.
Not a single mailbox, no. Not nearly
On 5/10/19 1:16 PM, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> On 2019-05-10 12:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> I wanted to comment OP's mail, but since I don't have DKIM set up, I
>> wasn't
>> sure it would pass :-)
>
> I actually didn't have DKIM signing set up myself until a couple weeks
> ago. I had
On 2019-05-10 12:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I wanted to comment OP's mail, but since I don't have DKIM set up, I
wasn't
sure it would pass :-)
I actually didn't have DKIM signing set up myself until a couple weeks
ago. I had been lazy in setting it for a while, but I had to because
On 5/10/19 1:52 AM, Pedro David Marco wrote:
On the contrary, most spam i see is valid DKIM signed... tons of
hacked sites... tons of emails from free trials of big-cheeses...
Nevertheless...
meta NO_DKIM_SIGNED ! DKIM_SIGNED
score NO_DKIM_SIGNED 2
describe
On 5/10/19 1:52 AM, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
>
> On the contrary, most spam i see is valid DKIM signed... tons of
> hacked sites... tons of emails from free trials of big-cheeses...
>
> Nevertheless...
>
> meta NO_DKIM_SIGNED ! DKIM_SIGNED
> score NO_DKIM_SIGNED
Hi Kurt,
On the contrary, most spam i see is valid DKIM signed... tons of hacked
sites... tons of emails from free trials of big-cheeses...
Nevertheless...
meta NO_DKIM_SIGNED ! DKIM_SIGNEDscore NO_DKIM_SIGNED
2describe NO_DKIM_SIGNED Email does not have
I've noticed on my mail server that DKIM signing is almost diagnostic of
spam. Almost no legitimate sender is without DKIM, and about 90% of my
spam is unsigned, so I want to bias non-DKIM-signed heavily towards
spam. To that end I was wondering if there are any built-in rules I can
activate
