On 04.08.10 14:54, Happy Chap wrote:
I already had v3.2.3 running on the system, so I thought was upgrading! I
followed the instructions on the Upgrading to the latest version page
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UpgradingVersion) which suggested
installing by CPAN to upgrade so that's
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:23 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I already had v3.2.3 running on the system, so I thought was upgrading! I
followed the instructions on the Upgrading to the latest version page
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UpgradingVersion) which suggested
installing
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:23 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I already had v3.2.3 running on the system, so I thought was upgrading! I
followed the instructions on the Upgrading to the latest version page
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UpgradingVersion) which suggested
::VERSION.\n;'
it reports 3.003001, so I think I genuinely am running version 3.3.1 and I
have killed all spamd restarted them.
So why am I getting 3.2.3 still in the header of newly received mails?
Thanks, David.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/X-Spam-Version-Checker-reports
I guess the subject is incorrect. You are indeed running 3.2.3. ;)
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 14:18 -0700, Happy Chap wrote:
I've just upgraded from SpamAssassin 3.2.3 to 3.3.1 and it all appeared to
install correctly. However, X-Spam-Version-Checker is still coming up as
3.2.3 after restarting
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 14:18 -0700, Happy Chap wrote:
Hi,
I've just upgraded from SpamAssassin 3.2.3 to 3.3.1 and it all appeared to
install correctly. However, X-Spam-Version-Checker is still coming up as
3.2.3 after restarting spamd. Can anyone suggest what I've done wrong?
I think that's
?
Because... it is actually running. :)
New I avoid upgrading for a reason. Can you offer any suggestion as to what
I should do next to sort the mess I've created out?
Thanks, David
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/X-Spam-Version-Checker-reports-3.2.3-but-running-3.3.1
this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/X-Spam-Version-Checker-reports-3.2.3-but-running-3.3.1---Why--tp29351374p29351698.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 14:54 -0700, Happy Chap wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Hmmmthanks for your reply Karsten.
I already had v3.2.3 running on the system, so I thought was upgrading! I
followed the instructions on the Upgrading to the latest version page
thought about just giving it a try, but I'm just weary about making it
worse now!
Thanks, David.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/X-Spam-Version-Checker-reports-3.2.3-but-running-3.3.1---Why--tp29351374p29351762.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:02 -0700, Happy Chap wrote:
Happy Chap wrote:
If I just issue a spamd --version at the bash prompt, it does report back
as SpamAssassin Server version 3.3.1 and as to which spamd, I seem to have
3: /usr/bin/spamd /usr/sbin/spamd and also /usr/bin/X11/spamd
OK,
was yesterday!
One final question - do I just delete the old spamd from /usr/sbin now to
avoid any confusion (I've never uninstalled anything under Linux before)?
Thanks for your help Karsten - much appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/X-Spam-Version-Checker-reports-3.2.3
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:10 -0700, Happy Chap wrote:
/usr/bin/spamd is v3.3.1
/usr/sbin/spamd is v3.2.3
/usr/bin/X11/spamd is also v3.3.1
Is it as simple as I just need to edit my /etc/init.d/spamd script to amend
any references in their from /usr/sbin/spamd to /usr/bin/spamd ?
I guess
help.
David.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/X-Spam-Version-Checker-reports-3.2.3-but-running-3.3.1---Why--tp29351374p29351910.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:23 -0700, Happy Chap wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
What installed that init script? I believe SA built from CPAN does
*not*, so that's either your creation, or more likely part of the distro
supplied package (I assume) that provides SA 3.2.
And, well, in
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:32 -0700, Happy Chap wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
Uninstalling the old version (Installed by distro packages, right!? You
never confirmed this.) would be a very good idea. But beware, if both
versions actually share some prefix and thus files, you might end
16 matches
Mail list logo
