Thank you all for your advices. I have checked the Maia DB (table awl) and
I have
a lot of records mailer-daemon%.ru with a negative scores. In conclusion, I
have a lot
of spam scoring between 0..5 (2.5, 2.8, etc) but not been considered spam.
So,
I think that deleting this records from the DB
Den 2012-02-22 09:46, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral skrev:
What do you think about that?
i dont think
2012/2/21 Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com
$ spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist u...@example.com
--
Bowie
Seems that it's not working for me. I have called spamassassin
--remove-addr-from-whitelist
but row is still on the MySQL database...
cmsa1:/tmp # spamassassin
Den 2012-02-22 10:17, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral skrev:
2012/2/21 Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com
$ spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist u...@example.com
cmsa1:/tmp # spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist
spamassassin -R spammsg.file
sa-learn --spam --showdots spammsg.file
do
Im afraid that it doesnt anything :-(
cmsa1:/tmp # spamassassin -R foo.dat
SpamAssassin auto-whitelist: removing address: xx...@zz.es
SpamAssassin auto-whitelist: removing address:
mailer-dae...@relay.hostingconsult.ru
SpamAssassin auto-whitelist: removing address: m...@checklicense.ru
On 2/22/12 5:14 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
But in the MySQL shows up the record...
usernameemailipcount totscore
vscan mailer-dae...@relay.hostingconsult.ru
mailto:mailer-dae...@relay.hostingconsult.ru 194.587
-2.393
disable AWL. it is
Now, Im very confused. I have configured to NOT Use AWL.
# Auto-Whitelist configuration
# Deshabilitar Auto-whitelist
use_auto_whitelist 0
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
I have checked with spamassassin --lint the config and restart spamd.
I am still seeing AWL triggered on the amavis
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 12:36:31 UTC, aguti...@gmail.com
confabulated:
Now, Im very confused. I have configured to NOT Use AWL.
# Auto-Whitelist configuration
# Deshabilitar Auto-whitelist
use_auto_whitelist 0
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
I have checked with
I have tried in two ways:
1) commenting out AWL loadplugin line in v310.pre, restarting spamd. Amavis
log is showing that AWL rules are still triggered.
2) commenting out AWL loadplugin line in v310.pre, and including
use_auto_whitelist 0 in local.cf.
spamassassin --lint produces an error.
I have just discovered that I have a .spamassassin directory under
/var/spool/amavis/,
the home directory of the vscan user (who is running amavis and call SA).
Under this
directory are two files, auto-whitelist and user_prefs.
Maybe user_prefs file are overriding local.cf ? All settings in
On 2/22/12 7:36 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
I have checked with spamassassin --lint the config and restart spamd.
I am still seeing AWL triggered on the amavis log:
and, you don't use spamd with amavisd-new.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
*| *SECNAP
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 13:04:31 UTC, aguti...@gmail.com
confabulated:
I have tried in two ways:
1) commenting out AWL loadplugin line in v310.pre, restarting spamd. Amavis
log is showing that AWL rules are still triggered.
2) commenting out AWL loadplugin line in v310.pre, and
Oh, thank you! I though that restarting spamd was sufficient.
2012/2/22 Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 13:04:31 UTC,
agutierr@gmail.comconfabulated:
I have tried in two ways:
1) commenting out AWL loadplugin line in v310.pre, restarting spamd.
Amavis
On 2/22/12 8:17 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
Oh, thank you! I though that restarting spamd was sufficient.
you don't run spamd at all with amavisd-new. just wasting ram/cpu/swap.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
*
Ok, after restarting amavisd-new its working without AWL plugin. Thank you
all for
your replies. Im going to try a while without AWL to see results.
Thank you so much.
Antonio.
2012/2/22 Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com
On 2/22/12 8:17 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
Oh,
Hi all!
I'm afraid this is yet another thread about Auto white lists module :-(
Sorry if this question is yet
solved on the list.
I have a lot of Spam and backscatter throwing high spam score on my actual
spam assassin system (postfix,
spamassassin with amavisd-new and Maia). Tracing these
On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
rule AWL is triggered with a negative score. Reading the documentation
I think that the problem
was a wrong auto-learn thresold for HAM, the first week the system
starts to work. The initial
thresold for Ham was -0.001 and I think that this
Hi Michael, thank you for your quick reply.
For example, this is a report for a mail tagged as non spam:
Content analysis details: (3.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 BAYES_50
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 15:18:30 UTC, michael.scheid...@secnap.com
confabulated:
On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
rule AWL is triggered with a negative score. Reading the documentation
I think that the problem
was a wrong auto-learn thresold for HAM, the first
On 2/21/2012 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
Hi all!
I'm afraid this is yet another thread about Auto white lists module
:-( Sorry if this question is yet
solved on the list.
I have a lot of Spam and backscatter throwing high spam score on my
actual spam assassin system
I know that Bayes and AWL are different thinks, but I think that if your
non-spam
thresold is low (-0.001 in my case) mails classified are non spam could be
false positives. [1]
It doesnt affect to the AWL table? I think that AWL has auto-learn...
[8409] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based
On 2/21/2012 10:42 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
I know that Bayes and AWL are different thinks, but I think that if
your non-spam
thresold is low (-0.001 in my case) mails classified are non spam
could be false positives. [1]
It doesnt affect to the AWL table? I think that AWL has
So, if I have a lot of spam getting negative score from AWL, the problem was
that in previous moment these spam was not classified as spam (getting
high score) and in conclusion AWL understand that is a legal sender?
Sorry if this cuestion is trivial :-( I am not pretty sure
if I am understanding
On 2/21/2012 11:21 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
So, if I have a lot of spam getting negative score from AWL, the
problem was
that in previous moment these spam was not classified as spam
(getting high score) and in conclusion AWL understand that is a legal
sender?
Sorry if this
Den 2012-02-21 16:28, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral skrev:
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is
sa-learn --spam from all that bounce msgs could help
-4.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the
AWL is not a whitelist with static scores for ham and spam,
Den 2012-02-21 16:29, Duane Hill skrev:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AWL.html
3.3.x have it enabled so this url is okay :-)
use_auto_whitelist ( 0 | 1 ) (default: 1)
this line is to disable it pr user in user_prefs, the plugin is still
enabled
Den 2012-02-21 16:42, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral skrev:
[8409] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based get_addr_entry: found existing
entry for mailer-daemon@X|ip=XX.YY
ipv4/16 mask is in use, try change it to ipv4/24 or ipv4/32
So, its AWL deprecated? Is better solution remove the addresses from
On 2/21/12 4:09 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-02-21 16:29, Duane Hill skrev:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AWL.html
3.3.x have it enabled so this url is okay :-)
use_auto_whitelist ( 0 | 1 ) (default: 1)
this line is to disable it pr user
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 21:25:08 UTC, michael.scheid...@secnap.com
confabulated:
On 2/21/12 4:09 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-02-21 16:29, Duane Hill skrev:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AWL.html
3.3.x have it enabled so this url
29 matches
Mail list logo
