i want to implement bayesian Filtering site-wide
and Auto whitelisting
site-wide..
anyone help me regarding this setup
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup
sa-learn --spam -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots
--dir /path/to/directory/full/of/spam/msgs
Chris writes:
On Monday 18 February 2008 6:29 am, ram wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 06:14 -0600, Chris wrote:
On Monday 18 February 2008 4:33 am, ItsMikeE wrote:
For some time now I have been getting spams that look like
Hello! I am tired this evening. I am nice girl that would like
Agnello George wrote:
spamd --listen-ip=0.0.0.0 http://0.0.0.0 --allowed-ips=121.240.XX.X
the child process gets spawned
That's fine, for testing anyway... later when you want to daemonize be
sure to use the -d option rather than .
but when i telnet from 121.240.XX.X it tries to connect
On Monday 18 February 2008 11:25:21 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 10:56 -0600, Rob Wright wrote:
Greetings all.
I'm using 3.2.4 on Debian Etch. I'm not sure that I'm actually getting
network tests run.
spamassassin -D --lint yields this in the plugins section:
The
Resolved. Cleared my sa-keys directory and re-imported them all.
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845
Luis Hernn Otegui wrote:
2008/2/17, comparity [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have found that in the last few months a lot of mail has been coming
through. I believe that the bayes filter isn't working. None of the caught
messages include a bayes score.
I have dutifully put all of my
Unfortunately she changes the .info domain as often as she changes her
knickers. :-p
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Michael Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 February 2008 20:10
To:
what does netstat -an | grep 783 show ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone:
On 2/19/08, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agnello George wrote:
spamd --listen-ip=0.0.0.0 http://0.0.0.0 --allowed-ips=121.240.XX.X
the child process gets spawned
That's fine, for testing anyway... later when you want to daemonize be
sure to use the -d option rather than .
Good morning everyone, i'm in charge of reducing SPAM at a customer
site. Already have SPAMASSASSIN, sa-update weeklyexecuted.
I'd like to implement a Bogus MX for further filtering of SPAM. I
don't know if this is the correct name, by Bogus MX i mean setting up
a low priority MX record which
On 2/19/08, Agnello George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/19/08, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agnello George wrote:
spamd --listen-ip=0.0.0.0 http://0.0.0.0 --allowed-ips=121.240.XX.X
the child process gets spawned
That's fine, for testing anyway... later when you want
On 2/19/08, Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agnello George wrote:
Hi
I can tel net port 783 on localhost ... but cant telnet it remotely
...how is that done ...thanks
You can do this using spamd's -i parameter:
From man spamd:
**-i* [/ipaddress/], *--listen-ip*[=/ipaddress/],
I have smatermail connecting to my remote system by startin spamd as follows :
spamd -u spamd -d -i -s /var/log/spamd.log --allowed-ips 216.185.
thnen wheni chk the logs i get the following ...why does it show
for (unknown):500 .. is this a error
Tue Feb 19 19:13:49 2008 [8182] info: spamd:
On 19.02.08 17:17, Agnello George wrote:
I have smatermail connecting to my remote system by startin spamd as follows :
spamd -u spamd -d -i -s /var/log/spamd.log --allowed-ips 216.185.
thnen wheni chk the logs i get the following ...why does it show
for (unknown):500 .. is this a
sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org
error: GPG validation failed!
The update downloaded successfully, but it was not signed with a trusted GPG
key. Instead, it was signed with the following keys:
6C6191E3
I recall seeing this on the list a while ago. How do you fix
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming
outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
/
Tarak
Chat on a cool, new interface. No download required. Go to
http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php
Good morning everyone, i'm in charge of reducing SPAM at a customer
site. Already have SPAMASSASSIN, sa-update weeklyexecuted.
I'd like to implement a Bogus MX for further filtering of SPAM. I
don't know if this is the correct name, by Bogus MX i mean setting up
a low priority MX record
Tarak Ranjan escribió:
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming
outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
/
Tarak
You can check spamd logs.
I also see it in my qmail smtpd logs.
Also, in every incoming mail's header you should see some added lines, like:
Tarak Ranjan ha scritto:
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming
outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
What about looking at the full headers of the received message? This
seems to me the quickest way. This is a little different depending on
your mail client, but once
Yes, I modified the permissons on the users home directory (more strict) and
SA/procmail began working.
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:39 -0800, timinator08 wrote:
Hi, I'm setting up a user with spamassassin but unable to get it working.
The
following is from the
On 2/19/08, Tarak Ranjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming
outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
did'nt get your question massing through SA. ??
--
Regards
Agnello Dsouza
www.linux-vashi.blogspot.com
www.bible-study-india.blogspot.com
--- Agnello George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do i come to know that each and every incoming
outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
did'nt get your question massing through SA. ??
--
Regards
Agnello Dsouza
how do i come to know that each and every incoming
outgoing mail is
Agnello George wrote:
On 2/19/08, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but when i telnet from 121.240.XX.X it tries to connect ..but the
connection brakes after 30 seconds
spamd isn't exactly a telnet server for humans, it's not going to greet
you. :)
if it does
From: Francesco Abeni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:55:59 +0100
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [OT] Bogus MX opinions
Good morning everyone, i'm in charge of reducing SPAM at a customer
site. Already have SPAMASSASSIN, sa-update weeklyexecuted.
I'd like to
Agnello George wrote:
i have checked the logs and mail sacnning is happeing :-) ... but what
i see is the following in the logs :
Feb 19 18:37:52 vps1 spamd[7508]: spamd: still running as root: user
not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to
nobody
It means that
On 2/19/08, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agnello George wrote:
i have checked the logs and mail sacnning is happeing :-) ... but what
i see is the following in the logs :
Feb 19 18:37:52 vps1 spamd[7508]: spamd: still running as root: user
not specified with -u, not
On 2/19/08, Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agnello George wrote:
On 2/19/08, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but when i telnet from 121.240.XX.X it tries to connect ..but the
connection brakes after 30 seconds
spamd isn't exactly a telnet server for humans, it's
Thomas Raef ha scritto:
(...) I'd like to implement a Bogus MX for further filtering of
SPAM. I don't know if this is the correct name, by Bogus MX i
mean setting up a low priority MX record which points at a non-smtp
server.
I'd like to know some first-hand experience about two questions.
This is bug 5442, btw.
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 23:54 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
For what? The only config lines that I can think of that are really
long are for rules. We're certainly not going to go sticking
backslashes in the middle of regexes.
Not necessarily in the middle of REs,
As you will see from the headers, for some reason it is still forcing a test
against Required Score of 2.5. I am trying to see where it is getting this
instruction of 2.5 from.
1. In my server-wide /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I have this:
required_score 12
2. In my user_prefs for an
Rubin Bennett writes:
P.S.: List Admins: Is there a way to toss Nabble postings
automatically? They annoy the hell out of me, and I suspect I'm not
alone :)
Actually, Nabble posting is fine. Please avoid setting list
policy without being invited to do so ;)
--j.
Andy Dills wrote:
...the people in charge of uribl.com have decided to set a pretty
low threshold for blacklisting DNS servers from querying, demanding
that people who hit that threshold pay them a rather exorbitant rate
for a data feed.
Andy,
Does the fee you describe pay for (a) being
Francesco Abeni wrote:
Good morning everyone, i'm in charge of reducing SPAM at a customer
site. Already have SPAMASSASSIN, sa-update weeklyexecuted.
I'd like to implement a Bogus MX for further filtering of SPAM. I
don't know if this is the correct name, by Bogus MX i mean setting
up a low
Bowie Bailey ha scritto:
Francesco Abeni wrote:
(...) I'd like to implement a Bogus MX ...
I would say that it is too risky to put a non-smtp host as your primary
MX. There are some servers which will have a problem with that setup
and either be unable to deliver mail to you or delay the
Francesco Abeni wrote:
Bowie Bailey ha scritto:
Francesco Abeni wrote:
(...) I'd like to implement a Bogus MX ...
I would say that it is too risky to put a non-smtp host as your
primary MX. There are some servers which will have a problem with
that setup and either be unable to
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Abeni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:12 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Spamassassin
Subject: Re: [OT] Bogus MX opinions
Something else that can be useful is using an MTA blacklist. I use
the
zen.spamhaus.org
In many cPanel installations the spamassassin setup ignores local.cf
and user_prefs in favor of a server wide setup. You may wish to
contact your provider to see if local.cf can be enabled for your
setup.
On Feb 19, 2008 9:01 AM, Shanx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you will see from the headers,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Rob McEwen wrote:
Andy Dills wrote:
...the people in charge of uribl.com have decided to set a pretty low
threshold for blacklisting DNS servers from querying, demanding that people
who hit that threshold pay them a rather exorbitant rate for a data feed.
Andy,
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:58 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Rubin Bennett writes:
P.S.: List Admins: Is there a way to toss Nabble postings
automatically? They annoy the hell out of me, and I suspect I'm not
alone :)
Actually, Nabble posting is fine. Please avoid setting list
policy
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Tarak Ranjan wrote:
how do i come to know that each and every incoming outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
Check your MTA logs. My MTA logs the score and rules hit for every message
processed through SA. Messages that don't pass through SA will have other
MTA log
Hi all,
Getting tones of this sort of email through have been learning it as
spam for the last few days but so far not much luck.
--start of message 2 examples
Aloha,***
Real men!* Milliions of people acrosss the world have already tested THIS
Goedendag, ***
Real men!* * *MMillions of
Probably /var/log/maillog or wherever syslog logs your mail facility.
Daryl
Daryl,
Hey, that is kinda neat...
telnet localhost 783
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
PING SPAMC/1.0
SPAMD/1.4 0 PONG
Connection closed by foreign
please post a URL to a sample message, or via pastebin so that we can run it
through our installations and see what it hits.
what is your SA installation hitting and scoring it as ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint:
The url to pastebin is http://pastebin.ca/910275
apologies if this is wrong - its my first time using pastebin.
That appears to be the message body, but we would ideally like to see the
entire message with all of the headers. There is a lot of data in headers
that makes the spam easier to
Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'd rather suffer a few broken applications, or in this case, a user
having to cut a domain name out of an email and paste it into a web
browser and not be able to simply click through the message body, if
it helps maintain the clear distinction between well-formed
ItsMikeE wrote:
For some time now I have been getting spams that look like
Hello! I am tired this evening. I am nice girl that would like to chat with
you. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because I am using my friend's email
to write this. To see my pics
They are still not being picked up,
Kathryn Allan wrote:
The url to pastebin is http://pastebin.ca/910275
apologies if this is wrong - its my first time using pastebin.
Your pastebin of the message body was good. Normally it would be
better to paste the full headers in too so that we can run the message
through the tools
Francesco Abeni wrote:
Good morning everyone, i'm in charge of reducing SPAM at a customer
site. Already have SPAMASSASSIN, sa-update weeklyexecuted.
I'd like to implement a Bogus MX for further filtering of SPAM. I
don't know if this is the correct name, by Bogus MX i mean setting
up a low
Hi Bob,
Thanks I will try the suggestions in the other post.
I have updated the pastebin with header - i think : )
http://pastebin.ca/910315
Thanks again
Kate
Bob Proulx wrote:
Kathryn Allan wrote:
The url to pastebin is http://pastebin.ca/910275
apologies if this is wrong - its my first
Hmm the update changed the link i think
http://pastebin.ca/910320
Bob Proulx wrote:
Kathryn Allan wrote:
The url to pastebin is http://pastebin.ca/910275
apologies if this is wrong - its my first time using pastebin.
Your pastebin of the message body was good. Normally it would be
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 10:36 +1300, Kathryn Allan wrote:
Thanks I will try the suggestions in the other post.
I have updated the pastebin with header - i think : )
http://pastebin.ca/910315
It is a multipart/alternative message -- in this case HTML. ;) For
reference, please, always paste the
I have removed the extras and changed the expiry.
http://pastebin.ca/910360
Thanks for the help
Kate
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 10:36 +1300, Kathryn Allan wrote:
Thanks I will try the suggestions in the other post.
I have updated the pastebin with header - i think :
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
It is a multipart/alternative message -- in this case HTML. ;) For
reference, please, always paste the entire, raw message. Don't
copy-n-paste what your MUA displays as body. (I was going to reply to
your previous mail, but you beat me to it.)
Definitely posting
I too am getting dozens of these emails that are going right through
SA + pyzor + dcc. sa-learn doesn't seem to make any difference. I
just installed razor2 today to try to combat real men.
Most get through w/ a score of 2 or less. Many of them seem to
trigger spamcop so i bumped that up to
Andy Dills wrote:
It appears (from email recently sent to the admins of a few small
mailservers I help admin) that the people in charge of uribl.com have
decided to set a pretty low threshold for blacklisting DNS servers from
querying, demanding that people who hit that threshold pay them a
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 09:13 +1300, Kathryn Allan wrote:
Getting tones of this sort of email through have been learning it as
spam for the last few days but so far not much luck.
Now that we've settled on the technical difficulties of pastebins, and
since we've all seen that one before
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Filtering the top 0.45% IPs results in 20% fewer queries/second to the
mirrors. I dont see trying to limit excessive bandwidth usage on donated
mirrors as an obnoxious stance.
The obnoxious stance comment is in demanding payment for reducing the
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:21:53 -0800
Bazooka Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too am getting dozens of these emails that are going right through
SA + pyzor + dcc. sa-learn doesn't seem to make any difference. I
just installed razor2 today to try to combat real men.
Most get through w/ a score
I just implemented Justins ruleset and it looks as if they will now be
caught YAY thanks for the tip.
Has anyone had trouble with fp's using this ruleset the ones its hitting
seem to score high (4)
Thanks
Kate
Bob Proulx wrote:
Kathryn Allan wrote:
The url to pastebin is
At 15:33 19-02-2008, Andy Dills wrote:
load on your servers. All of the other RBLs that I'm aware of (could be
wrong) are happy to provide data feeds free of charge. To be perfectly
Some RBLs do charge if your organization is doing more than X queries daily.
Regards,
-sm
Rubin Bennett wrote:
If you want to post to this list, please subscribe like a regular user,
and do your research first before you post. Nabble, in a word, sucks.
When the SpamAssassin mailing list page stops recommending Nabble, perhaps
users will stop posting from Nabble.
At 06:39 AM 2/19/2008, Rubin Bennett wrote:
If you want to post to this list, please subscribe like a regular user,
and do your research first before you post. Nabble, in a word, sucks.
It fences your posts as being from a subscribed address when in fact
it's not, and Nabble is not a forum at
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:25:41 -0500 (EST)
Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears (from email recently sent to the admins of a few small
mailservers I help admin) that the people in charge of uribl.com have
decided to set a pretty low threshold for blacklisting DNS servers
from
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
You sure about that?
They don't understand the very basics of email. They just managed
*again* to send the very same Message-Id *twice*. Yeah, the Nabble folks
I am subscribed to this list. Perhaps whoever manages the SA list page
Stephen Sloan-4 wrote:
In many cPanel installations the spamassassin setup ignores local.cf
and user_prefs in favor of a server wide setup. You may wish to
contact your provider to see if local.cf can be enabled for your
setup.
Thanks Stephen.
How and where can we enable local.cf for
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
/
Tarak
Andy Dills wrote:
For instance, if we ran a cacheing nameserver on each of our mailservers,
would you have ever noticed us?
Err - are you saying you are generating 500K requests/day against that
ONE RBL domain - and you are *not* running a caching server?!?!?
[Hell, I even run a caching
I've actually been running this set of 5 rules on several of the ISP
mail systems I've got my fingers in (watch for line wrap, sorry):
# Nice girl wants to send pics, but only if you email the address in
the body
# start scoring at .5, see how that whacks'em.
body NICE_GIRL_01
From: Tarak Ranjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 2/19/2008 7:23
To: Spamassassin
Subject: How to Know
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
/
Tarak
For incoming, look at the
-Original Message-
From: Bazooka Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 11:22 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestions to block this spam
I too am getting dozens of these emails that are going right through
SA + pyzor + dcc.
Am/On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:49:34 -0800 schrieb/wrote Evan Platt:
At 06:39 AM 2/19/2008, Rubin Bennett wrote:
If you want to post to this list, please subscribe like a regular user,
and do your research first before you post. Nabble, in a word, sucks.
It fences your posts as being from a
-Original Message-
From: Tarak Ranjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 1:24 a.m.
To: Spamassassin
Subject: How to Know
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
/
Tarak
Hmm. Is this Spam?
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:49 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
At 06:39 AM 2/19/2008, Rubin Bennett wrote:
If you want to post to this list, please subscribe like a regular user,
and do your research first before you post. Nabble, in a word, sucks.
It fences your posts as being from a subscribed
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:26 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
You'll be lucky to catch them on anything other than phrase matching, as
they're very simple in design, those spam messages. Much like the
downlooadable sooftware one's we used to get. To a program, there's
not much that looks like
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
body NICE_GIRL_01 /Hello! I am (?:bored|tired) (?:today|this
(?:afternoon|evening)|tonight)\./
Forgive my ignorance, but what does the question mark and colon do at
the start of the brackets? I have (bored|tired) in my own rules, so how
does (?:bored|tired)
Rubin Bennett wrote:
the lack of information relevant to
this mailing list and it's source prompted me to send perhaps a stronger
response than was necessary.
This is the SpamAssassin users list. For people who are using SpamAssassin
and having trouble with it.
My post was absolutely
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:48 -0800, Shanx wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
Ye flippin gods, my Nabble name for this email address. Damn, why
don't they just accept that my real name does not have any number in it?
They don't understand the very basics of email. They just managed
*again*
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Did you by any chance edit your post?
No, I clicked the Resend button. Not Nabble's fault. The SA mailing list
says on its page that posting from Nabble without registering for the list
is fine. But it's not. I need to register, then I can use the Nabble
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:40 -0800, Shanx wrote:
Rubin Bennett wrote:
FWIW, Nabble sends all emails ONCE (as the mailing list would). [...]
Nabble *does* send multiple emails re-using the very same Message-Id, if
one edits their forum post.
[...] I'm not sure what your little ramble is about
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Jason Haar wrote:
Andy Dills wrote:
For instance, if we ran a cacheing nameserver on each of our mailservers,
would you have ever noticed us?
Err - are you saying you are generating 500K requests/day against that ONE
RBL domain - and you are *not* running a caching
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 3:33 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Suggestions to block this spam
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:26 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
You'll be lucky to catch
-Original Message-
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
body NICE_GIRL_01 /Hello! I am (?:bored|tired) (?:today|this
(?:afternoon|evening)|tonight)\./
Forgive my ignorance, but what does the question mark and colon do
at
the start of the brackets? I have (bored|tired) in my own
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:59 -0800, Shanx wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
That name's fine. :)
Did you by any chance edit your post?
No, I clicked the Resend button. Not Nabble's fault. The SA mailing list
says on its page that posting from Nabble without registering for the list
is
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 16:08 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:26 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
You'll be lucky to catch them on anything other than phrase matching, as
they're very simple in design, those spam
Thomas Raef wrote:
Good morning everyone, i'm in charge of reducing SPAM at a customer
site. Already have SPAMASSASSIN, sa-update weeklyexecuted.
I'd like to implement a Bogus MX for further filtering of SPAM. I
don't know if this is the correct name, by Bogus MX i mean setting up
a low
Dallas Engelken wrote:
Superb. Thats all you had to do in the first place without raising a
stink.
Aww, but it's so much more fun to post an inflammatory rant at the start
of a message. :-)
insert comment about any sports team sucking here... preferably a
baseball team.
If SA wants to
This is the SpamAssassin users list. For people who are using SpamAssassin
and having trouble with it.
My post was absolutely within the remit of this list. And I provided as
much
information as I thought was relevant, including the header tags added by
SA, the local.cf file, the
Robert - elists-2 wrote:
Since you posted that you do not mind using a console shell, you could
always do what everyone else does and do some debugging and research and
post your results...
Funnily enough that's the useful response. This would be a much more useful
list if instead of
Funnily enough that's the useful response. This would be a much more
useful
list if instead of pouncing on non-experts with tangential rants people
simply offered a link or two, or said precisely what kind of test info is
needed.
I have now seen these pages:
89 matches
Mail list logo
