Thanks for your response. The problem is unfortunately still not solved.
Yesterday I dropped the database and re-created it from bayes_mysql.sql file
that is bundled with the SpamAssassin package (and added a lastupdate
field). 12 hours or so after I re-enabled bayes the load avg and I/O wait
On 2010-03-30 01:29, Brent Kennedy wrote:
Graylisting does work.
I know it works. That's why I said I like it because it stops spam. Been
using my own implementation for years.
I think after I turned it on, the botnet plug-in got bored. My stats for it
dropped significantly. So that’s
Jonas Eckerman wrote on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:52:43 +0200:
I suspect that If the botnets were short on bandwidth and computer
power, the programmers would have fix those issues a long time ago. And
the simple fact that they still haven't adapted to greylisting indicates
that it's impact is
Jonas Eckerman wrote on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:41:01 +0200:
Unless the greylisting is done *after* receiving the body. Of course,
this will spank innocent senders as well.
Ooops? It spanks *yourself*. Good strategy.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 11:04 +0200, Martin Svensson wrote:
Thanks for your response. The problem is unfortunately still not
solved.
Yesterday I dropped the database and re-created it from
bayes_mysql.sql file that is bundled with the SpamAssassin package
(and added a lastupdate field). 12
On 2010-03-30 13:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Jonas Eckerman wrote on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:41:01 +0200:
Unless the greylisting is done *after* receiving the body. Of course,
this will spank innocent senders as well.
Ooops? It spanks *yourself*.
Not really. It does force us to accept the mail
Hi,
What settings do people typically have these days for the maximum
scanned message size? Surprisingly, at least to me, I'm seeing spam in
the 650k and 700k range, at least a few per hour, and are not scanned.
Does anyone have any suggestions for optimizing the process for spam
containing just
On 30.3.2010 12:04, Martin Svensson wrote:
Thanks for your response. The problem is unfortunately still not solved.
Yesterday I dropped the database and re-created it from bayes_mysql.sql
file that is bundled with the SpamAssassin package (and added a
lastupdate field).
Just a double
Again, thanks for your contributions all.
Martin: We are running SA on separate servers, our MySQL is running on a
dedicated server. The servers running Amavis/SA are running smoothly, no
swap and no insanse I/O operations.
Jari: The engine is InnoDB on all Bayes-tables.
According to
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
On 2010-03-30 01:29, Brent Kennedy wrote:
I think after I turned it on, the botnet plug-in got bored. My stats
for it dropped significantly. So that’s my proof it does adversely
affect botnets.
No, that's your proof that it has a positive
(Subject line changed to remove the 'flag' to developers)
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
.. But then again, this is a topic for the dev
list [1] to start a discussion, not here.
Uh, no, I'm not a developer. And the description of that list
specifically says...
For
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 09:38 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
(Subject line changed to remove the 'flag' to developers)
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
.. But then again, this is a topic for the dev
list [1] to start a discussion, not here.
Uh, no, I'm not a developer.
On 3/29/2010 3:31 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
WAY too many gmail and hotmail and yahoo accounts out there, and they
HAVE TO END IN DIGITS.so, FREEMAIL-ENVFROM_END_DIGIT is redundant with
FREEMAIL.
Agreed. My data point FWIW: since yesterday, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT
here has hit on 2304
Dennis B. Hopp began:
I received the following e-mail http://pastebin.com/JXr9buxi
It had a total score of 4.973 (blocked at 5). [...] it hit:
KHOP_RCVD_TRUST=-1.75,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-0.5,SPF_PASS=-0.001
Michael Scheidell responded:
is that an old rule? i just checked SA updates, and I
Alex wrote:
Hi,
What settings do people typically have these days for the maximum
scanned message size? Surprisingly, at least to me, I'm seeing spam in
the 650k and 700k range, at least a few per hour, and are not scanned.
Does anyone have any suggestions for optimizing the process for
Alex wrote:
What would be involved with making the PSBL DNSBL work with v3.2.5?
Alex, I'm pretty sure that you are already using PSBL through my
khop-bl channel, which adds PSBL, BRBL, Spam-eating Monkey (SEMBLACK),
HostKarma/JunkEmailFilter, and, more recently, MSPIKE (as per a
request from
Hi,
What would be involved with making the PSBL DNSBL work with v3.2.5?
Alex, I'm pretty sure that you are already using PSBL through my
khop-bl channel, which adds PSBL, BRBL, Spam-eating Monkey (SEMBLACK),
HostKarma/JunkEmailFilter, and, more recently, MSPIKE (as per a
request from João)
17 matches
Mail list logo
