On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Henrik K h...@hege.li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 06:31:37PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Henrik K h...@hege.li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:52:00PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
Answering myself, I have reworked our
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:26:27PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
It also states that msa_networks propagates those hosts *_networks settings
recursively. Which means the dial-ups will be internal too.
Ah, interesting. So I should explicitly *not* put my dialup MSAs in
msa_networks, and
Thank you Rick Your diagnostic was correct.
- - - - (extract from /etc/defaults/spampd) - - -
# Wether or not to do only local checks
# if this is turned on, no network based checks
# (like DNS-Blacklists) are done. (0/1)
LOCALONLY=1
On 08.04.10 22:41, Frederic De Mees wrote:
Please note
Appreciate that this is an SA list, but it tends to share a userbase
with ClamAV. Apologies if mentioned, but potentially these could mean
carnage to users of Clam who have not updated in a while:
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20100407.141109.2a7c287b.en.html
Dear ClamAV users,
this is a
Hello list,
I have a slight problem using custom rules with latest SA release.
I am using a mysql DB to store the per user and per domain configs as
described in the SA howto.
Now I wanted to write a custom rule which should also be stored in the
mysql DB.
This does not seem to work, although
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 08:47 +0100, corpus.defero wrote:
Appreciate that this is an SA list, but it tends to share a userbase
with ClamAV. Apologies if mentioned, but potentially these could mean
carnage to users of Clam who have not updated in a while:
Hi Mikael,
Have you looked in the sql for postgres ? Have the structure changed?
I have compared the latest dump of my spamassassin database with the ddl
scripts provided by spamassasin. There really were some changes.
For example the table bayes_token now uses bytea instead of character(5).
I
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 20:43 +0200, m...@mherrn.de wrote:
Hi,
I am running spamassassin with a PostgreSQL DB as bayes storage.
After an upgrade from debian etch to debian lenny, this bayes storage
doesn't work anymore.
[..]
Its highly likely that Postgres 8.3.9 can't read a
Dear All,
I have Spamassassin on my Centos 5.4. For send and receive email I use
postfix and Dovecot and Sendmail version 8.13.8. Since I have installed the
spamassassin I have not configured it. We are getting about 20 spams per
day. I want to configure it and get it working. I did google it
On 09/04/2010 13:43, hateSpam wrote:
Dear All,
I have Spamassassin on my Centos 5.4. For send and receive email I use
postfix and Dovecot and Sendmail version 8.13.8. Since I have installed the
spamassassin I have not configured it. We are getting about 20 spams per
day. I want to configure it
Birta Levente wrote:
On 09/04/2010 13:43, hateSpam wrote:
Dear All,
I have Spamassassin on my Centos 5.4. For send and receive email I use
postfix and Dovecot and Sendmail version 8.13.8. Since I have
You seem a little confused - are you running postfix or sendmail as your
MTA?
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:09:35 +0300
Henrik K h...@hege.li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:26:27PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
Maybe I'm having a vocabulary problem. My MSAs are really also
MTAs - they receive mail from the customer, do an MX lookup on the
destination domain, and
leeyc0,
After some struggle and tracing every bit of code (including tracing
installing cpan packages!), apparently it is a bug in the latest
Net::DNS::Packet::Resolver::Base send_tcp function call...
Yes, it is caused by a bug in Net::DNS::Resolver::Base (sorry, there was a
typo before
Realize this is OT, and that even the instigation is OT :)
But I'm hoping someone here just KNOWS 'rpm'. and can help...
(Or can point me to the best forum for a quick answer)
While attempting to use rpm on RH9 to update to a newer set of clamav
packages, the rpm process locked up, and I had
On 4/9/10 9:45 AM, Charles Gregory cgreg...@hwcn.org wrote:
Realize this is OT, and that even the instigation is OT :)
But I'm hoping someone here just KNOWS 'rpm'. and can help...
(Or can point me to the best forum for a quick answer)
While attempting to use rpm on RH9 to update to a
Thanks a lot for replies. Do I have to install Amavisd-new and ClamAV to get
spamassassin working? Is there any other way to configure spamassassin with
postfix not installing additional software?
Ned Slider wrote:
Birta Levente wrote:
On 09/04/2010 13:43, hateSpam wrote:
Dear All,
I have
I have both on my server and both are running but I am using postfix MTA.
hateSpam wrote:
Thanks a lot for replies. Do I have to install Amavisd-new and ClamAV to
get spamassassin working? Is there any other way to configure spamassassin
with postfix not installing additional software?
On 2010-04-09 17:31, hateSpam wrote:
Thanks a lot for replies. Do I have to install Amavisd-new and ClamAV to get
spamassassin working? Is there any other way to configure spamassassin with
postfix not installing additional software?
See: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedInMta
On 4/9/10 10:31 AM, hateSpam khwaja_a...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Thanks a lot for replies. Do I have to install Amavisd-new and ClamAV to get
spamassassin working? Is there any other way to configure spamassassin with
postfix not installing additional software?
Yes, there are hundreds of ways
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 10:50 -0500, Daniel McDonald wrote:
On 4/9/10 10:31 AM, hateSpam khwaja_a...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Thanks a lot for replies. Do I have to install Amavisd-new and ClamAV to get
spamassassin working? Is there any other way to configure spamassassin with
postfix not
OT - RPM
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Daniel McDonald wrote:
I'm currently trying 'rpm --rebuilddb' but it's just sitting there, and
I've got a feeling it has locked-up too
You've got to delete the __db.* files in /varlib/rpm before you run
--rebuilddb
I'm trying that now, but don't have much
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Daniel McDonald wrote:
You've got to delete the __db.* files in /varlib/rpm before you run
--rebuilddb
That worked. Thanks! (wiping brow with relief)
- C
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:46 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:09:35 +0300
Henrik K h...@hege.li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:26:27PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
Maybe I'm having a vocabulary problem. My MSAs are really also
MTAs - they receive mail
I have AWL enabled and it seems to be ok with helping out legitimate
senders that occasionally send a spammy type message, but lately I
have seen an increase where AWL is adding a negative score to a very
blatant spam.
So my questions are, do people feel AWL is worth having enabled?
Is there
Dennis B. Hopp wrote:
I have AWL enabled and it seems to be ok with helping out legitimate
senders that occasionally send a spammy type message, but lately I
have seen an increase where AWL is adding a negative score to a very
blatant spam.
So my questions are, do people feel AWL is worth
Not that I'm aware of.
Is the AWL score enough to prevent the messages from being marked as
spam, or are you seeing the negative AWL score on messages that are
marked as spam? It is normal for AWL to give negative scores to spam
from time to time, but for the most part, it should not be
On fre 09 apr 2010 22:33:39 CEST, Dennis B. Hopp wrote
Is there a way to have the AWL rule only triggered if there is a minimum
number of messages seen by that sender?
if AWL helping spam, then you need to prevent forged senders more
in sa 3.2.5 set
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Dennis B. Hopp wrote:
I know how AWL works and occasionally it will lower the score of a spam,
but it just seems to be happening more often lately.
Maybe the rulesets are improving and scoring spams higher than spams from
the same source have historically been scoring...?
Royce Williams wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:46 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
msa_networks defines the MSA by IP address. If SA runs on an MSA its
address is unlikely to be in the received headers. In that case SA has
no way of distinguishing an MSA from an MX server.
Yes!
29 matches
Mail list logo
