Hi all,
Can we use spamassasin in ISP environment to scan outbound emails?
Regards,
Alans
--On Tuesday, May 04, 2010 4:22 AM +0100 RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Are you training BAYES? A lot of these are hitting BAYES_50 or even
BAYES_00.
On 03.05.10 20:06, Kenneth Porter wrote:
I've been copying them into my Uncaught folder which is run with
sa-learn --spam --mbox
Hi,
I have a problem on one server that I see several times an hour
this problem logged by spamd
Wed May 5 10:04:43 2010 [88823] info: spamd: handled cleanup of child
pid [90622] due to SIGCHLD: DIED, signal 11 (000b)
And in the main messages file a corresponding error regarding the
--On Wednesday, May 05, 2010 11:29 AM +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
do you wipe bayes database often? If not, it's not needed to retrain on
all messages, since they are not forgotten.
I don't recall ever deleting the DB. It's my understanding that sa-learn
remembers
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:44 +0300, Alans wrote:
Hi all,
Can we use spamassasin in ISP environment to scan outbound emails?
Regards,
Alans
Yes. But separate out your inbound outbound scans.
For outbound Disable all IP based rules because they will cause FP's.
Also we have often seen
__ NOD32 5087 (20100505) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
Hi,
An update it looks like the problem may well be this Perl bug
that affects Perl 5.10.1 in the FreeBSD ports tree...
http://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=69973
thanks Andy.
Hi,
how can I check if SpamAssassin is checking SPF? I ask because we
have had instances of spam being delivered using a spoofed email
address that is from a domain actually hosted on our mail server,
which shouldn´t happen if SPF is being used (SPF is configured in DNS
for the domain
On Mit, 2010-05-05 at 15:38 +0300, Alans wrote:
[...]
Actually we are seeking a solution to our problem which is sending spam
through our network.
We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our smtp relay
and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!).
Hi,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 03:38:01PM +0300, Alans wrote:
...
We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our smtp relay
and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!).
As Bernd Petrovitsch already told you: Yes, that's possible.
To close port 25 is a
ram wrote:
i still see this errors
May 5 10:28:03.484 [3153] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule SHORTCIRCUIT
May 5 10:28:03.485 [3153] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule SUBJ_RE_NUM
May 5 10:28:03.485 [3153] dbg: config: warning: score set for
PS in my init.pre SPF is loaded:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
Quoting a.sm...@ukgrid.net:
spam emails and send notification back to sender
about
his/her activity.
That part of the job is for your MTA, not for spamassassin.
--
Regards
Frank
__ NOD32 5087 (20100505) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
On 5.5.2010 15:38, Alans wrote:
We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our smtp relay
and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!).
We want to reject all spam emails and send notification back to sender about
his/her activity.
There is one
On ons 05 maj 2010 14:53:06 CEST, wrote
No, score=1.8 required=4.8 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,MISSING_MID,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no
version=3.3.0
no spf, and 3.3.1 is latest :)
Anyone give me any clues?
spamassassin 21 -D -t msg | grep spf | less
perldoc
Hi Benny,
thanks for the info. As I mentioned in a follow up I have the
plugin listed to load in my init.pre. But as you rightly guessed SPF
isnt loaded, as per the spamassassin -D -t msg test you described.
So what can be missing? I must admit to finding the configuration
files quite
On ons 05 maj 2010 15:51:31 CEST, wrote
thanks for the info. As I mentioned in a follow up I have the plugin
listed to load in my init.pre. But as you rightly guessed SPF isnt
loaded, as per the spamassassin -D -t msg test you described.
any spf from @inc ?
--
xpoint
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Greg Troxel wrote:
Thanks - I did pretty much understand the tests. What I'm boggled about
is that they suddenly started firing, and then now suddenly do not.
This is perfectly consistent with the explanation I offered at the
beginning of this thread. A legitimate Google
Hi Benny,
do you mean in the general perl envrionment? From that I have the
following available regarding mail:
Actually I just realised I didnt run the test command against a real
mail, Ive just rerun it and I get loads of SPF stuff, starting like
this:
May 5 15:30:31.372 [12084]
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:44 +0300, Alans wrote:
Hi all,
Can we use spamassasin in ISP environment to scan outbound emails?
ram wrote:
Yes. But separate out your inbound outbound scans.
FWIW I can say with authority that this is not necessary. It may
simplify your mail system depending
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 5.5.2010 15:38, Alans wrote:
We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our smtp relay
and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!).
We want to reject all spam emails and send notification back to sender about
his/her
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
Why shouldn't it be possible?
SpamAssassin doesn't care where the mail comes from
Well, actually, it DOES. The test DOS_DIRECT_TO_MX being an example.
Which brings me back to the slightly confused feeling that I still get
over
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
There is one special group that will suffer from that decision: namely
SpamAssassin users within your network.
If they do report their spam to SpamCop using SpamAssassin's own report
mechanism, they are screwed
Why not just add a negative-scoring
On ons 05 maj 2010 16:33:39 CEST, wrote
tests_pri_-400: 4 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 2040 (23.4%), check_spf: 76
(0.9%), check_razor2: 1643 (18.9%), check_pyzor: 0.39 (0.0%),
tests_pri_500: 2506 (28.8%)
i see check spf there, but might fail on missing perl module Mail::SPF
So its using SPF
From this maillist the x-spam-status is:
No, score=-11.1 required=4.8 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS
autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Hehe, this is another server which is on Spamassassin 3.1.1, seems it
is using SPF on this
On 5/5/10 11:15 AM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
So I think that proves it is using SPF doesnt it? If you´d agree then
my next question is why did it delivery mail with a spoofed email
address of a domain that it is hosted on our mail server? Im using
exim and Im looking at an example of this
On 5.5.2010 17:39, Kris Deugau wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 5.5.2010 15:38, Alans wrote:
We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our
smtp relay
and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!).
We want to reject all spam emails and send
On 5.5.2010 17:44, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
There is one special group that will suffer from that decision: namely
SpamAssassin users within your network.
If they do report their spam to SpamCop using SpamAssassin's own report
mechanism, they are
Hi Micheal,
ok I have to come clean on a little error here which Ive just been
thinking over, which by coincidence I have noticed attempting to mail
Benny. Benny's email server bounced my mail due to an SPF error, which
I have never seen myself on my mail nor reported by anyone using this
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
If my SA sends an email to SpamCop with a spam as an attachment, and
that gets rejected by my ISP and a feedback sent to me.. it would be a
problem. To me.
*headdesk* Ah, right.
We're not keen on being a smarthost for customers already running their
own mail systems
On ons 05 maj 2010 17:15:56 CEST, wrote
So I think that proves it is using SPF doesnt it?
yes
If you´d agree then my next question is why did it delivery mail
with a spoofed email address of a domain that it is hosted on our
mail server? Im using
good question, was it ?
read perldoc
On 5/5/2010 5:38 AM, Alans wrote:
Thanks ram,
Actually we are seeking a solution to our problem which is sending spam
through our network.
We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our smtp relay
and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!).
We
On ons 05 maj 2010 17:45:20 CEST, wrote
Im not sure if I can test this, obviously running spamassassin from
the command line isnt going to be able check against the sending
host of the mail (as there is none).
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=ukgrid.netsubmit=Go!
--
xpoint
Thanks, I was meaning I dont know if I can test spamassassin to see if
it now correctly scores email. If I can get another server to relay
some mail I guess, right now I cant think of one
Quoting Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org:
On ons 05 maj 2010 17:45:20 CEST, wrote
Im not sure if I
ok for the header bitty, Im using
envelope_sender_header Return-path
Which I think should be appropriate for exim, and Im sticking it in
the user_prefs in the home dir of the user that spamd runs as. Is that
the right config file?
thanks Andy.
Charles Gregory cgreg...@hwcn.org writes:
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Greg Troxel wrote:
Thanks - I did pretty much understand the tests. What I'm boggled
about is that they suddenly started firing, and then now suddenly do
not.
This is perfectly consistent with the explanation I offered at the
What options can't be overridden in user prefs? I would like to disable RBL
checks and possible use a separate mysql bayes database for one user. But it
would be generally nice if know if there are options that are global that can't
overridden.
On 2010-05-05, at 5:09 AM, ram wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:44 +0300, Alans wrote:
On my servers I just add the score header and let the mail go but send a copy
to a program. If more
than 10 occur in 30 minutes from the same customer , the customers
account is temporarily blocked and
... except, after checking their site just now, you now get a
personalized reporting address once you've signed up. *sigh*
AFAIK, the reporting e-mail addresses are all of the form
/^submit.\...@spam\.spamcop\.net$/ .
Hi,
thanks a lot for your help, its seems to be working great now.
I sent a message from a server not defined in the domain SPF using my
email address and it got a failed spam scored based on SPF_FAIL :)
Great :)
thanks to everyone who commented,
Andy.
In particular, I find these two paragraphs from
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf to be contradictory:
Trusted relays that accept mail directly from
dial-up connections
(i.e. are also performing a role of mail submission
agents - MSA)
should not be listed in
41 matches
Mail list logo
