Disable

2010-06-02 Thread Gabor Illo
Can somebody know how can i disable this RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET? It's correct? echo score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf

Re: Disable

2010-06-02 Thread Matt Kettler
On 6/2/2010 8:45 AM, Gabor Illo wrote: Can somebody know how can i disable this RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET? It's correct? echo score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf assuming that /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/ is your site rules dir, yes. If in doubt,

Re: does anyone know of (filtering-)software that would fiddle with Content-Type?

2010-06-02 Thread Joseph Brennan
Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote: I've received a virtually unreadable email - about 3Mb worth, containing text, html and a zip file. Nothing unusual about it, except that the Content-Type should have been multipart/mixed and specified a boundary - instead it was just text/plain, which made

Re: does anyone know of (filtering-)software that would fiddle with Content-Type?

2010-06-02 Thread Per Jessen
Joseph Brennan wrote: Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote: I've received a virtually unreadable email - about 3Mb worth, containing text, html and a zip file. Nothing unusual about it, except that the Content-Type should have been multipart/mixed and specified a boundary - instead it

Re: does anyone know of (filtering-)software that would fiddle with Content-Type?

2010-06-02 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 6/2/10 9:42 AM, Joseph Brennan bren...@columbia.edu wrote: Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote: I've received a virtually unreadable email - about 3Mb worth, containing text, html and a zip file. Nothing unusual about it, except that the Content-Type should have been multipart/mixed

Sa-learn huh

2010-06-02 Thread Randy Ramsdell
[09:23] botboy sa-learn { forget,spam,ham} SHOULD change the BAYES scores correct? [09:24] botboy We upgraded spamassassin and it just does not work like it did before. [09:24] botboy I would normally be able to learn as spam and change the bayes score to a 3.5 [09:25] botboy but now i relearn

Re: Sa-learn huh

2010-06-02 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/2/10 11:39 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: [09:23] botboy sa-learn { forget,spam,ham} SHOULD change the BAYES scores correct? [09:24] botboy We upgraded spamassassin and it just does not work like it did before. [09:24] botboy I would normally be able to learn as spam and change the bayes score

Re: Sa-learn huh

2010-06-02 Thread Randy Ramsdell
Michael Scheidell wrote: On 6/2/10 11:39 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: [09:23] botboy sa-learn { forget,spam,ham} SHOULD change the BAYES scores correct? [09:24] botboy We upgraded spamassassin and it just does not work like it did before. [09:24] botboy I would normally be able to learn as spam

Re: Sa-learn huh

2010-06-02 Thread Bowie Bailey
Randy Ramsdell wrote: IIRC, when I sent messages through sa-learn on the old mail server as spam, then checking with spamassassin debug, this would show a 3.5 BAYES score. I will double check this, but I would hope to at least add a positive score when training a spam message. Training a

RE: Attached Spam Messages

2010-06-02 Thread Scott Ostrander
On May 28, 2010 John Hardin wrote: I am having the same issue, In fact, I was going to post the same exact question. We've been having a problem with emails that are completely blank except for an attached .rtf file which is where the spam message is. Is there a way of decoding that file

SpamAssassin is a disaster for me

2010-06-02 Thread a . smith
Hi, as per the subject Im having severe problems, any help much appreciated. My installation: FreeBSD 8.0-p2 Exim 4.71 SpamAssassin 3.3.1 Perl 5.10.1 All packages have been installed from source via FreeBSD ports. The problem: Two main issues really 1) Ever since this server was built (as a

Re: SpamAssassin is a disaster for me

2010-06-02 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/2/10 2:25 PM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote: Hi, as per the subject Im having severe problems, any help much appreciated. run GFI on a windows 2007 server and all your troubles will be over. Next time, try picking a subject line that will immediately piss off anyone who knows anything

Re: SpamAssassin is a disaster for me

2010-06-02 Thread a . smith
Well firstly I have said for me so Im not trying to trash Spamassasin (I seem to be in a minority of people with any severe issues), and secondly I have posted some of the same issues previously without such a theatrical subject and I received zero replies. No offence was intended for

Re: SpamAssassin is a disaster for me

2010-06-02 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
This weekend I just setup a mailserver running: FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE generic kernel then cvsupped the current ports and make installed on our software. I'm having no problems at all. I'll send you more info off list. This was a clean install. In other words, I FTP'ed the configs and mail

Re: SpamAssassin is a disaster for me

2010-06-02 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:25 +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote: as per the subject Im having severe problems, any help much appreciated. My installation: FreeBSD 8.0-p2 Exim 4.71 SpamAssassin 3.3.1 Perl 5.10.1 All packages have been installed from source via FreeBSD ports. 1) Ever

Re: SpamAssassin is a disaster for me

2010-06-02 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
It's either Ground Fault Interruptor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual-current_device) commonly used in kitchens and bathrooms ;-) or it's something from this company: http://www.gfi.com/ Ted On 6/2/2010 11:38 AM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote: Well firstly I have said for me so Im not

perf problems (was Re: SpamAssassin is a disaster for me

2010-06-02 Thread spamassassinlist
Hi, What can I do? Thanks for any suggestions This is what I do when I get performance issues, and long-running processes: 1) check for memory issues such as not enough low memory using free -l and monitor the machine with top and vmstat for a while to get a general feeling of what

Re: SpamAssassin is a disaster for me

2010-06-02 Thread Mark Martinec
Andy, FreeBSD 8.0-p2 Exim 4.71 SpamAssassin 3.3.1 Perl 5.10.1 All packages have been installed from source via FreeBSD ports. The problem: Two main issues really 1) Ever since this server was built (as a replacement for another Exim/FreeBSD mail server) I have been seeing in the main

Re: perf problems (was Re: SpamAssassin is a disaster for me

2010-06-02 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
On 6/2/2010 12:01 PM, spamassassinl...@saphirtech.fr wrote: Hi, What can I do? Thanks for any suggestions This is what I do when I get performance issues, and long-running processes: Here is another performance hint. When you first setup your server and it's running right, do the

Performance problem body tests

2010-06-02 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance problem: [/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and is no longer supported, ignoring. Jun 2

Re: Performance problem body tests

2010-06-02 Thread David Michaels
Quoting Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de: Hi, with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance problem: [/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and

Re: Performance problem body tests

2010-06-02 Thread Helmut Schneider
David Michaels wrote: Quoting Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de: Hi, with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance problem: [...] timing: total 36840 ms - init: 3827 (10.4%), parse: 43 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 822 (2.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 178

Re: [sa] Performance problem body tests

2010-06-02 Thread Charles Gregory
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Helmut Schneider wrote: with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance problem: What distinguishes 'certain mails'? Length? Content? Mime attachements? So the body tests take ~ 30 of 37 seconds. It's not a load problem, I noticed a significant

Re: Performance problem body tests

2010-06-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed 02 Jun 2010 09:52:51 PM CEST, Helmut Schneider wrote Hi, with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance problem: [/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint doh :) - != -- /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn:

Error Spamassassin with pyzor

2010-06-02 Thread Jose Luis Marin Perez
Dear Sirs, I have installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS 4.8, reviewing SA logs shows the following message: warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response It should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8 What is

Re: Error Spamassassin with pyzor

2010-06-02 Thread fchan
Dear Sirs, I have installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS 4.8, reviewing SA logs shows the following message: warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response It should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8 What is wrong?

Re: Error Spamassassin with pyzor

2010-06-02 Thread Mark Martinec
Jose Luis, I have installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS 4.8, reviewing SA logs shows the following message: warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response It should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8 So what

Re: Error Spamassassin with pyzor

2010-06-02 Thread Scott Hughes
Jose Luis, I have installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS 4.8, reviewing SA logs shows the following message: warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response It should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8