On 03.06.10 20:45, cviebrock wrote:
Thanks for the link. That'll help.
In general, though, can I write a SA rule that looks at the raw message body
with trying to decode attachments, etc.? I thought that would be the
easiest way to catch these messages (and some other spam that comes in as
Bug 6403 comment 19 [1]?
[cut]
You are aware you still will have to add the macros to the postfix conf,
as stated in that bug report and [1]? Did you do that?
No, i was not aware of that. Can't understand how i missed it - it's
even plainly stated in spamass-milter docs. *bonk*
Just for
Am 03.06.2010 16:42, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Tarvo Kurm wrote:
Mails coming in thru postfix+spamass-milter+spamassassin have
drastically lower scores than those checked manually with spamassasin
or spamc. Specifically, mails taking the milter path will not have
RCVD_IN rules matched _almost_
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:44 -0700, cviebrock wrote:
I'm trying to write a rule to catch a bunch of spam I'm getting recently that
contain only an .RTF file. The filename, subject line, and other details
vary, but the raw message body is always the same i.e. the base64 encoded
RTF file.
See
On Friday June 4 2010 07:09:25 Scot Meyer wrote:
I am unable to get a clean install using the directions in INSTALL from
working. I have a VM of the Mandriva image prior to installing any
version of spamassassin. Then I downloaded 3.3.1 and followed the
directions including running sa-update
Whoa, thanks I completely missed that. Apparenlty Mandriva 2010 free includes
perl-Mail-SpamAssassin and spamassassin rpms by default even though I am pretty
sure I unselected mail server from the list of install options.
Scot
--- On Fri, 6/4/10, Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
You're right in that it *could* be a common RTF header, but a bit of decoding
of the attachments on my end seems to indicate that it isn't. All these
spam RTFs are practically identical except for a different URL link in the
document, and a different (probably forged) generator Msftedit
On Fri 04 Jun 2010 04:44:46 AM CEST, cviebrock wrote
http://pastebin.com/xFddVaX8
http://sanesecurity.org/ dont know what clamav rules helps for this,
but this is another way to stop spam attachements
remember to make good choice of official sigs in clamd if using clamav
milter, only
Hi,
I have installed spam assassin in my server and its working perfectly. I
have included the following parameters in the local.cf file
rewrite_header Subject [* SPAM _SCORE_ *]
required_score 2.0
#to be able to use _SCORE_ we need report_safe set to 0
#If this option is
Hi,
What is the maximum allowed spam score value for a legitimate mail? What
value should i set as the spam score limit?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/spam-score-limit-adivse-tp28781886p28781886.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at
On 4.6.2010 18:53, aquero wrote:
Hi,
What is the maximum allowed spam score value for a legitimate mail? What
value should i set as the spam score limit?
The default is 5 and that value works best for any installation, as the
stock rules are configured using that value.
You have it at 2
On 4.6.2010 18:40, aquero wrote:
I want to know
whether spam-assassin will check the mail content also for finding spam
score , in its default settings. If not what changes should I make in the
configurations for, the spam-assassin to include the mail content , for its
spam check. Please
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 4.6.2010 18:53, aquero wrote:
Hi,
What is the maximum allowed spam score value for a legitimate mail?
What
value should i set as the spam score limit?
The default is 5 and that value works best for any installation, as the
stock rules are configured
Hi,
When i checked the third party softwares for spam-assassin i found many
custom rule sets. Do I have to install these rule sets manually? If I
perform sa-update, will it will include all these rule sets into my
spam-assassin rules list?
--
View this message in context:
aquero wrote:
Hi,
What is the maximum allowed spam score value for a legitimate mail? What
value should i set as the spam score limit?
On my own servers, I lean towards being a little extra conservative. I
don't tag subject lines until the score reaches 6. However, if the
score gets to
On 4.6.2010 19:33, aquero wrote:
Hi,
When i checked the third party softwares for spam-assassin i found many
custom rule sets. Do I have to install these rule sets manually? If I
perform sa-update, will it will include all these rule sets into my
spam-assassin rules list?
sa-update can
I am using Extracttext from
http://whatever.frukt.org/spamassassin.text.shtml#ExtractText.pm
It extracts text from attached .rtf .doc and some other formats. Then
feeds the results to BAYES and normal body testing.
My issues are that it works great with SA 3.2.5, However on the same
server it
aquero wrote:
Hi,
When i checked the third party softwares for spam-assassin i found many
custom rule sets. Do I have to install these rule sets manually? If I
perform sa-update, will it will include all these rule sets into my
spam-assassin rules list?
Before you start adding a bunch of
On 05/29/2010 05:03 AM, Yves Goergen wrote:
Stepping away from the ZMI issue and headig towards the larger
picture, what kind of spam are you trying to nail down with this
ruleset? What goals did you hope to meet with the ZMI rules? If
it's a specific type of spam, can you pastebin an
Hi,
I have installed spam-assassin in my mail server and when i sent mails
from my gmail accout i always get these errors.
* 2.4 DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS RBL: Envelope sender listed in bl.open-whois.org.
* 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Because of these errors my
20 matches
Mail list logo
