On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:52:50AM -0700, John Hardin wrote:
Trust here is not about won't spam, and ALL_TRUSTED is not a
whitelist.
Pfft semantics.
I shortcircuit ALL_TRUSTED with a huge trusted_networks list. :-) So yes
it's a whitelist for me. I add networks known to be spam free and
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Henrik K h...@hege.li wrote:
I shortcircuit ALL_TRUSTED with a huge trusted_networks list. :-) So yes
it's a whitelist for me. I add networks known to be spam free and operated
by friends (other govenment entities, consulting firms etc). Everything
works
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:52:50AM -0700, John Hardin wrote:
Trust here is not about won't spam, and ALL_TRUSTED is not a
whitelist.
On 31.10.13 10:59, Henrik K wrote:
Pfft semantics.
I shortcircuit ALL_TRUSTED with a huge trusted_networks list. :-) So yes
it's a whitelist for me. I add
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:45:45AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:52:50AM -0700, John Hardin wrote:
Trust here is not about won't spam, and ALL_TRUSTED is not a
whitelist.
On 31.10.13 10:59, Henrik K wrote:
Pfft semantics.
I shortcircuit ALL_TRUSTED with
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:52:50AM -0700, John Hardin wrote:
Trust here is not about won't spam
Btw trusted_networks entities haven't been checked in DNS blacklists since
2008... so in a sense it actually is an whitelist.. ;-)
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5856#c12
Can someone kindly explain a regex?
Lose .{0,2}.{0,1}(KG|Quilos|Kilos|Pounds|Lb)
It matches fine lose 22 pounds, lose 5 pounds. Now 3 digits such as lose
100 pounds it doesnt which is ok.
I was trying to understand those capture groups .{0,2}.{0,1}
. is any character and the 0,2 seems to be
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Marcio Humpris wrote:
Can someone kindly explain a regex?
Lose .{0,2}.{0,1}(KG|Quilos|Kilos|Pounds|Lb)
It matches fine lose 22 pounds, lose 5 pounds. Now 3 digits such as lose
100 pounds it doesnt which is ok.
I was trying to understand those capture groups .{0,2}.{0,1}
