On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:24:07 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:49:34 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
But as I said it's the decimal fractions that cause it to fail
and the above rule doesn't need to
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:24:07 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, RW wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:49:34 +0100
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
> > But as I said it's the decimal fractions that cause it to fail
> > and the above rule doesn't need to contain
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:49:34 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
But as I said it's the decimal fractions that cause it to fail
and the above rule doesn't need to contain decimal fractions.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:36:52 -0500 micah anderson wrote:
How can I
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> But as I said it's the decimal fractions that cause it to fail and the
> above rule doesn't need to contain decimal fractions.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:36:52 -0500 micah anderson wrote:
How can I do it without the fractions?
On 20.11.18
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:49:34 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> > But as I said it's the decimal fractions that cause it to fail
> >> > and the above rule doesn't need to contain decimal fractions.
>
> >On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:36:52 -0500 micah anderson wrote:
> >> How can I do it
> But as I said it's the decimal fractions that cause it to fail and the
> above rule doesn't need to contain decimal fractions.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:36:52 -0500 micah anderson wrote:
How can I do it without the fractions?
On 20.11.18 21:05, RW wrote:
meta LOCAL_EXCEEDED_PHISH
