On 09/06/2011 10:58 AM, Axb wrote:
On 2011-09-06 10:43, J4K wrote:
Hi,
I know that this is probably the hundredth time I have emailed to
the list about my custom rules. Usually, someone points out the
blindingly obvious when I fail to note it. This has been going on for
months. I'll
On 09/06/2011 12:07 PM, Axb wrote:
On 2011-09-06 12:03, J4K wrote:
On 09/06/2011 10:58 AM, Axb wrote:
On 2011-09-06 10:43, J4K wrote:
Hi,
I know that this is probably the hundredth time I have
emailed to
the list about my custom rules. Usually, someone points out the
blindingly
Hi there,
I've got these two rules in the local.cf.
describe PRIVATE_RULE1 English language job opportunity
body __PR1/(Employment opportunity|Job offer match, respond
to apply|Employment you've been searching|Job opportunity|Career
opportunity inside|Position opening in your
On 09/01/2011 04:33 PM, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 01/09/2011 16:23, J4K a écrit :
meta PRIVATE_RULE1 (__PR1 __PR2)
...
meta PRIVATE_PHONICA2 (__PR1 __PR2)
Spamassassin -D -lint records this:
Sep 1 15:45:56.313 [11484] dbg: rules: PRIVATE_PHONICA2 merged
duplicates: PRIVATE_RULE1
Afternoon gentlemen,
Seems the Bayes dB has become lop-sided in favour of ham. SA is
doing its job as there is little spam coming through these recently. I
had hoped we could keep it one third spam and two thirds spam. Does the
slant shown below (nspam verses nham) cause any problems
On 08/10/2011 12:08 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
W dniu 10.08.2011 12:00, akrohnke pisze:
Hello,
Currently one of our clients are getting spam that looks like it
comes from
the sender itself. Spamassassin only occasionally catches it.
Hello!
It should be done at smtp level.
if (sender
Hi,
I noticed that the site that provided the malware.blocklist.cf has
been unavailable since at least the 8th of August.
URL for the file was on http://www.malware.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
The FQDN no longer resolves to an address. I have tried our local DNS,
Level3 4.2.2.2 and
On 08/09/2011 10:50 AM, J4K wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the site that provided the malware.blocklist.cf has
been unavailable since at least the 8th of August.
URL for the file was on http://www.malware.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
The FQDN no longer resolves to an address. I have
Morning all,
I had a route around in the SA dox, and in
/usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf, to try and find out how to disable Bayes
classification for particular From: address. In particular, I don't
want Bayes to classify, or put into the database, messages from this
mailing list. You can see
On 07/13/2011 02:43 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 14:06 +0200, J4K wrote:
I assume you tested it as well as running it through lint (spamassassin
spam_sample.txt), so is it firing on samples of that type of spam?
Comments: As written the rule won't work because __PR2
Hi everyone,
Is 60_whitelist_spf.cf the correct place to whitelist SPF for a sender?
def_whitelist_from_spf *.junkemailfilter.com
It looks correct as per
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_SPF.txt
Also, I have added their delivery servers to the
On 06/29/2011 09:55 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 29/06/2011 4:58 PM, JKL wrote:
select count(spam_count) from bayes_vars
Run this query
SELECT username,spam_count,ham_count FROM bayes_vars
This will give a list of usernames that have been used to learn ham
and spam into SpamAssassin's
On 06/30/2011 11:09 AM, J4K wrote:
On 06/29/2011 09:55 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 29/06/2011 4:58 PM, JKL wrote:
select count(spam_count) from bayes_vars
Run this query
SELECT username,spam_count,ham_count FROM bayes_vars
This will give a list of usernames that have been used to learn
On 06/30/2011 11:38 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:09:18 +0200, J4K wrote:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody
should not be in a cf file but in a pre file, check other pre files to
enable it
Thank-you. Moved this into v320.pre
On 06/30/2011 11:37 AM, J4K wrote:
On 06/30/2011 11:09 AM, J4K wrote:
On 06/29/2011 09:55 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 29/06/2011 4:58 PM, JKL wrote:
select count(spam_count) from bayes_vars
Run this query
SELECT username,spam_count,ham_count FROM bayes_vars
This will give a list
On 06/30/2011 01:45 PM, J4K wrote:
On 06/30/2011 11:37 AM, J4K wrote:
On 06/30/2011 11:09 AM, J4K wrote:
On 06/29/2011 09:55 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 29/06/2011 4:58 PM, JKL wrote:
select count(spam_count) from bayes_vars
Run this query
SELECT username,spam_count,ham_count FROM
On 06/30/2011 01:45 PM, J4K wrote:
On 06/30/2011 11:37 AM, J4K wrote:
On 06/30/2011 11:09 AM, J4K wrote:
On 06/29/2011 09:55 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 29/06/2011 4:58 PM, JKL wrote:
select count(spam_count) from bayes_vars
Run this query
SELECT username,spam_count,ham_count FROM
[SNIP]
Hi there,
This is the table I have in mysql, and the one I intend to populate with
data:-
mysql describe bayes_vars;
++--+--+-+++
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default|
Extra |
On 06/30/2011 05:27 PM, Axb wrote:
spamassassin --lint -D bayes
Hi Axb,
Spamd runs as root.
# spamassassin --lint -D bayes
Jun 30 17:32:10.858 [2775] dbg: FuzzyOcr: focr_bin_helper:
'pnmnorm,pnminvert,ppmtopgm'
Jun 30 17:32:10.858 [2775] info: FuzzyOcr: Adding 3 new helper apps
Jun 30
On 06/30/2011 05:54 PM, Axb wrote:
ok.. you said Spamd runs as root.
in that case:
bayes_sql_override_username spamd
then as per Bowie:
sa-learn --username=spamd --ham /path/to/ham
sa-learn --username=spamd --spam /path/to/spam
then
sa-learn --dump magic
Ahh, I meant that spamd
On 06/30/2011 06:02 PM, Axb wrote:
Please only reply to the list...
On 2011-06-30 18:00, J4K wrote:
# sa-learn --username=spamd --ham .HAM/cur/
Learned tokens from 717 message(s) (764 message(s) examined)
# sa-learn --username=spamd --spam .Junk/cur
Learned tokens from 311 message(s) (368
Dear all,
Over the past few months I noticed an increase in 'Start New Employment
Today | Career Opportunity' style email. The rules I use, that are
pretty much stock rules, correctly tag the email as spam. Usually the
Spam score hovers between 5.5 and 6.9.
I would like to add a rule that adds
Dear everyone,
I wonder if I have some misconfiguration in my SA set-up, and if
someone would be able to send me off in the right direction, or has seen
it before. As shown below, some messages are scanned by SA with just
the user name, while others are scanned using the full login.
Fri Mar
On 03/01/2011 04:13 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 1.3.2011 0:06, Matt wrote:
Looking at top 8 newest messages from my personnel email account:
[Spammy subjects deleted]
None of them are SPAM. If I wanted to unsubscribe from them I would.
Its just if I do not read them within 30 days why
Hi,
I am interested in raising the score for the rule RDNS_DYNAMIC.
However, I cannot find it in any of the files under /etc/spamassassin.
I thought that it would be listed somewhere in this directory. In which
file is this located?
* Why do I want to raise the bar for RDNS_DYNAMIC?
I
On 02/17/2011 04:45 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, J4K wrote:
You do not want to alter the distributed files, as any alterations
would be lost on the next upgrade.
That rule doesn't appear in any of your local customization files
(under /etc/spamassassin) because you've never
On 02/17/2011 05:33 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 2/17/2011 10:51 AM, J4K wrote:
On 02/17/2011 04:45 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, J4K wrote:
You do not want to alter the distributed files, as any alterations
would be lost on the next upgrade.
That rule doesn't appear in any
Not a chance.
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
On 2/7/11 1:28 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:49:36
-0500 Michael Scheidellmichael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: because
HELO doesn't match RDNS. On 01.02.11 09:54, David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi chaps,
I added the FuzzyOCR (via Debian repos) into sa a few days ago, and
finally got around to running sa-compile which looks like it fails. I
tried with the -D option, but the verbosity was too great for me to make
head nor tail of it. I don't know if this is FuzzyOCR or
Where could
On 02/15/2011 02:19 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 15/02/2011 9:27 AM, J4K wrote:
spamassassin --lint
This may seem obvious, but did you run spamassassin --lint like
sa-compile suggested?
I assume DCC is probably not loaded, or disabled in your setup.
Open up /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
On 02/15/2011 02:43 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 15/02/2011 10:07 AM, J4K wrote:
Its pretty moot any way, because now after running spamassassin
-lint, sa-compile still fails with the same error.
Hi,
Just because DCC is running doesn't mean SA is configured to use it.
Can you post
On 02/15/2011 03:21 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 2/15/11 8:46 AM, J4K wrote:
use_dcc 1
dcc_path /usr/local/bin/dccproc
dcc_home /var/dcc
dcc_add_header 1
just like lint says, dcc_add_header is NOT valid.
locate DCC.pm
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin
Good morning everyone (almost the week-end),
Is X-IronPort-AV added by SA, or from something else (DCC Clamav ? )
I just noticed that all email from a certain company was flagged with
X-IronPort-AV, and I wonder why this is so.
I have searched on the usual engine, and saw refereces
On 01/28/2011 10:13 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 28/01/2011 10:11, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 28/01/2011 10:02, J4K wrote:
Good morning everyone (almost the week-end),
Is X-IronPort-AV added by SA, or from something else (DCC
Clamav ? )
I just noticed that all email from a certain
On 01/27/2011 05:58 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:43:55 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
oh, and to be safe:
reject_rhsbl_helo dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.2,
reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1,2,
reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1,2,
Sound advice to
On 01/27/2011 01:55 PM, Florescu, Dan Alexandru wrote:
Fire up what?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know SA does not reject at SMTP
session level.
I myself am using it with amavis and I have:
$sa_quarantine_cutoff_level = 12.0;
which will drop any spammy message with that score or
36 matches
Mail list logo
