mailing is shut down
https://gitlab.com/fumail/fuglu/-/issues/30
On 11/07/2020 20:35, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Matthew Broadhead skrev den 2020-07-11 10:11:
fuglu looks nice. it even handles the vacation messages from
database, whereas i have been struggling with sieve.
can it train the Bayes
i might try this docker-mailserver docker project
https://github.com/tomav/docker-mailserver/wiki/FAQ-and-Tips#how-can-i-make-spamassassin-learn-spam
On 11/07/2020 20:50, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Matthew Broadhead skrev den 2020-07-11 19:15:
because my box is centos 7 i think i am going to grab
that
the configuration is easily reproducible and it is obvious what has
changed from base config.
On 11/07/2020 11:21, Axb wrote:
On 7/11/20 10:11 AM, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
fuglu looks nice. it even handles the vacation messages from
database, whereas i have been struggling with sieve.
can it train
fuglu looks nice. it even handles the vacation messages from database,
whereas i have been struggling with sieve.
can it train the bayes as well?
On 10/07/2020 23:00, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Matthew Broadhead skrev den 2020-07-10 11:02:
i tried to set up bayes training before but i feel that i
should i be going to the dovecot team with this problem?
On 10/07/2020 14:26, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
i am starting to remember that sa-learn is being called from dovecot
in dovecot/conf.d/90-plugin.conf i have
plugin {
# man antispam
#setting_name = value
antispam_debug_target = syslog
, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
i mean bayes_seen table in my MySQL database
where did you configure bayes to use mysql?
are you sure amavis uses it?
and... did you train manually or do you completely rely on automatic
training?
On 10/07/2020 13:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.07.20 13:00
to the amavis mailing list
On 10/07/2020 13:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.07.20 13:16, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
i mean bayes_seen table in my MySQL database
where did you configure bayes to use mysql?
are you sure amavis uses it?
and... did you train manually or do you completely rely
i mean bayes_seen table in my MySQL database
On 10/07/2020 13:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.07.20 13:00, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
i have 788787 messages in my
your?
bayes_seen directory
what is the bayes_seen directory? I have bayes_seen file, which is
part of
the bayes
i have 788787 messages in my bayes_seen directory. 33494 are flagged
's'. i am not sure why it seems to have no effect on the spam coming
through
On 10/07/2020 11:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.07.20 11:02, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
i tried to set up bayes training before but i feel
:02:23, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
i tried to set up bayes training before but i feel that i was unsuccessful.
It would be helpful to know what gives you that feeling.
How are you training and how are you testing?
is there a definitive guide on setting this up on postfix with amavis? if my
user
09:58 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
On Thunderbird if I train the spam filter for a short time I get really
great results with it catching most of what I would consider spam.
the same with spamassassin when you train bayes
Also I wondered if there is a way to ask spamassassin to put the spam
Hi,
I am running postfix, dovecot, amavis, spamassassin and clamav on centos 7.
Everything is working great, and if I send an email with the spam
signature on it it gets blocked by spamassassin.
But still a lot of spam comes spamassassin and I wondered if there was a
really great guide out
On 09/05/18 20:43, David Jones wrote:
On 05/09/2018 01:29 PM, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
it looks like it is working. so maybe it is just not flagging or
moving
the spam?
in a differnt post you showed
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
it looks like it is working. so maybe it is just not flagging or moving
the spam?
in a differnt post you showed this status header which *clearly* shows
bayes is working - bayes alone don't flag
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
it looks like it is working. so maybe it is just not flagging or moving
the spam?
in a differnt post you showed this status header which *clearly* shows
bayes is working - bayes alone don't flag
On 09/05/18 16:03, Reio Remma wrote:
On 09.05.18 16:59, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
setting log_level and sa_debug in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf didn't
seem to make any difference. should i be doing it in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?
See if $sa_debug=1 works (for full debug)? (and restart
On 09/05/18 15:48, Reio Remma wrote:
On 09.05.18 16:33, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 08/05/18 21:53, Reio Remma wrote:
On 08.05.2018 22:08, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64,
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64
On 08/05/18 21:53, Reio Remma wrote:
On 08.05.2018 22:08, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64,
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
required_hits 5
On 09/05/18 09:09, Reio Remma wrote:
On 09.05.18 9:57, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
BAYES_00=-1.9
I've personally set *bayes_sql_override_username = amavis* in my local.cf
If at all possible, run amavisd with SA bayes debug to see if/how it's
using the database.
Good luck,
Reio
Thanks
working in same industry
On 08/05/18 21:08, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64,
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
required_hits 5
report_safe 0
system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64,
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
required_hits 5
report_safe 0
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_expire 1
# Store bayesian
sorry if this question is a bit vague but i am currently unable to ssh
into my server to get more info. i am using centos 7 and i have set up
spamassassin training by scanning messages which are moved into or out
of the junk folder. it seems to work ok because database entries are
being
hi, this morning i got this message from sa-update:
Update available for channel updates.spamassassin.org: 1821087 -> 1821132
http: (curl) GEThttp://sa-update.bitwell.fi/1821132.tar.gz, success
http: (curl) GEThttp://sa-update.bitwell.fi/1821132.tar.gz.sha1, success
http: (curl)
thanks for your quick reply. i expected the spam to be filtered into
the Junk mailbox on the server I guess.
i just sent a test email with GTUBE subject line and i got this
Jan 15 17:28:40 ns1 amavis[23493]: (23493-20) Blocked SPAM
{DiscardedInbound,Quarantined}, [74.125.82.46]:39246
i am using CentOS 7, spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64,
postfix-2.10.1-6.el7.x86_64, with amavisd.
i set my local.cf to use MySQL as a bayes store and it seems to work
fine setting ham and spam in the database when a message is flagged.
however it has had no impact on spam received to the
I have a cron to check once per day. Is that ok or do you think once
per week is enough?
On 21/11/2017 03:04, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
All,
If you are checking the SpamAssassin updates more than 2x a day,
expect to be blocked in the very near future. We have people checking
literally every
sorry +1 one for sunday
On 17/11/2017 15:14, David Jones wrote:
Is that +1 for Sunday start or Monday start?
Dave
On 11/17/2017 07:47 AM, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
+1 (non binding) sounds good to me
On 17/11/2017 14:45, David Jones wrote:
On 11/17/2017 06:32 AM, David Jones wrote:
On 11/16
+1 (non binding) sounds good to me
On 17/11/2017 14:45, David Jones wrote:
On 11/17/2017 06:32 AM, David Jones wrote:
On 11/16/2017 05:09 PM, Richard Doyle wrote:
Update applied, no issues.
I saw 18 testers in my web logs for yesterday's $REV. Thanks to
everyone that are helping by
Hi,
I downloaded and applied the update on CentOS 7
3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64. spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64. everything
seems to be working fine so far. I will let you know if there are any
issues
Thanks for all the work on the update,
Matthew
On 16/11/2017 14:22, David Jones wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
I have a firm of solicitors as clients and they get these same highly
targeted emails. They are much more sophisticated and have caused us
some problems already.
All I can do is keep reminding them to check that the email is authentic.
Some Solicitors have started adding a
30 matches
Mail list logo
