Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-06 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote: On 03/06/2018 12:54 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, RW wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote: In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is just riding

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-06 Thread David Jones
On 03/06/2018 12:54 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, RW wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote: In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-06 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, RW wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote: In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and high Bayes scores. What I generally look at

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-06 Thread RW
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote: > > In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is > > just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and high Bayes > > scores. > > What I generally look at is the detailed

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-06 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote: On 03/05/2018 06:57 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: Hi, On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:59 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: To: =?utf-8?Q?DermotO=27reilly?= * 

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-06 Thread David Jones
On 03/05/2018 06:57 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: Hi, On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:59 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: To: =?utf-8?Q?DermotO=27reilly?= *  2.6 APOSTROPHE_TOCC To or CC address

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-05 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: Hi, On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:59 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: To: =?utf-8?Q?DermotO=27reilly?= * 2.6 APOSTROPHE_TOCC To or CC address contains an apostrophe 2.6 points for this is

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-05 Thread Alex
Hi, On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:59 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: > >> To: =?utf-8?Q?DermotO=27reilly?= >> * 2.6 APOSTROPHE_TOCC To or CC address contains an apostrophe >> >> 2.6 points for this is just unreasonable. This

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-05 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: To: =?utf-8?Q?DermotO=27reilly?= * 2.6 APOSTROPHE_TOCC To or CC address contains an apostrophe 2.6 points for this is just unreasonable. This was a completely legitimate email. Is such an address even deliverable? -- John Hardin

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-05 Thread RW
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:28:33 -0600 David Jones wrote: > On 03/05/2018 04:20 PM, John Hardin wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: > > > >> 2.6 points for this is just unreasonable. This was a completely > >> legitimate email. > > > > What is the S/O in masscheck? > > > >

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-05 Thread David Jones
On 03/05/2018 04:20 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: 2.6 points for this is just unreasonable. This was a completely legitimate email. What is the S/O in masscheck? http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20180304-r1825801-n/APOSTROPHE_TOCC/detail It's a high S/O in the

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-05 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote: 2.6 points for this is just unreasonable. This was a completely legitimate email. What is the S/O in masscheck? -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-05 Thread Alex
Hi, On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:48 PM, RW wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:23:31 -0500 > Alex wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I just received a false-positive because of the following address: >> >> To: "'i...@example.se'" >> >> Apparently the apostrophe is enough

Re: APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-05 Thread RW
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:23:31 -0500 Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I just received a false-positive because of the following address: > > To: "'i...@example.se'" > > Apparently the apostrophe is enough to warrant 2.5 points alone? Is > this intended to catch addresses like

APOSTROPHE_TOCC score

2018-03-05 Thread Alex
Hi, I just received a false-positive because of the following address: To: "'i...@example.se'" Apparently the apostrophe is enough to warrant 2.5 points alone? Is this intended to catch addresses like tom.o'rei...@example.com or more like my example above? That seems like an