Tue Jul 20 16:12:4516:11:43 2010 [-7196] warn: error creatingdbg:
async: starting: URI-DNSBL, DNSBL:multi.surbl.org.:garden.com (timeout
15.0s, min 3.0s)
Tue Jul 20 16:11:43 2010 [-7196] dbg: dns: URIBL_PH_SURBL lookup start
Tue Jul 20 16:11:43 2010 [-7196] dbg: dns: providing a DNS resolver
On 14.07.10 15:42, Emin Akbulut wrote:
I run SA Win32 port 3.3.1 by JAM Software on Windows Server 2008 64 bit.
Spamassassin.exe always calculates the same score, coz User_Prefs file is
under my docs (C:\Users\ea\.spamassassin)
However spamd.exe -which runs as service- calculates the right
P.S: In my case all tests done in same input, but outputs have
different scores.
Does not spamd 3.3.1 (JAM) support logging? I want to log some info...
My recent scores on same input : )
OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.7 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
OK
X-Spam-Status: No,
From: Emin Akbulut [mailto:eminakbu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:54 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
P.S: In my case all tests done in same input, but outputs have
different scores.
Does not spamd 3.3.1 (JAM) support logging? I want to log some info...
-
From: Support SpamAssassin [mailto:spamassas...@jam-software.com]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:39 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [SpamAssassin] Re: First run score: 25.7 Second: 2.6
-Original Message-
From: Charles Gregory
Now if I have to GUESS
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 14:53 +0300, Emin Akbulut wrote:
Does not spamd 3.3.1 (JAM) support logging? I want to log some info...
When run under Linux it logs to /var/log/maillog. Does the DOS/Windows
version write log messages to stderr or does it just suppress them?
My recent scores on same
OK I've found the wrong score's log however I'm not
very familiar with SA debug logs, I've added
both correct 18 point and wrong 5.5 point' logs.
I also added processed messages.
http://rapidshare.com/files/407987154/spamd-logs.rar
*
*
http://rapidshare.com/files/407987154/spamd-logs.rar*I used
I've used SA/spamd.exe for a while because it calculates very high scores on
spams.
-I thought-
Then spams have appeared in people's inboxes and I needed to examine.
I've used another batch file to log spamd spam scores.
The commandline is:
C:\NET\SpamAssassinWin32-EX\winspamc.exe
Emin Akbulut wrote:
I've used SA/spamd.exe for a while because it calculates very high scores
on
spams.
-I thought-
Then spams have appeared in people's inboxes and I needed to examine.
I've used another batch file to log spamd spam scores.
The commandline is:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Emin Akbulut wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.5 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=24.4 required=6.3
-Original Message-
From: Charles Gregory
Now if I have to GUESS on insufficient data, I would suspect that the 'port'
of
spamd to Windows(?) does not properly tidy up its children when finished.
The fact that it crashes certainly points in this direction.
May I presume that you
In my first post, SA addition to message is included.
I am including all header lines this time; I noticed SA has added first
lines in one result,
and has added lines somewhere in the middle in other result. :P
I've restarted spamd after test # 1.
TEST1.TXT: It takes less than 2 seconds
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 10:11 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
Now if I have to GUESS on insufficient data, I would suspect that the
'port' of spamd to Windows(?) does not properly tidy up its children when
finished. The fact that it crashes certainly points in this direction.
May I presume that
I've stopped the mail server MTA during I was testing, so spamd
has checked only one message at same time.
It looks totaly random : )
Is the only difference between spamassassin.exe spamd.exe
their very own User_Prefs config files?
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Martin Gregorie
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 18:07 +0300, Emin Akbulut wrote:
I've stopped the mail server MTA during I was testing, so spamd
has checked only one message at same time.
It looks totaly random : )
Is the only difference between spamassassin.exe spamd.exe
their very own User_Prefs config
I knew what you mentioned, I mean do they use same engine, algorithm,
you name it... I think that If both use same Perl code then
the only remaining diffrence is User_Prefs like things...
BTW, I want to thank you all who spent time and answered us here,
passionately : ) I felt I'm not alone
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 21:50 +0300, Emin Akbulut wrote:
I knew what you mentioned, I mean do they use same engine,
algorithm, you name it...
That's a developer question, but I'd be surprised if it doesn't. The
Linux spamd executable is just a Perl script with the usual executable
script's first
It's possible, the local DNS server becomes non-responsive -hate Microsoft-
restarting DNS service is not solution, I have to restart machine.
*** I DIDN'T VERIFY IT'S THE ROOT CAUSE OR NOT ***
I also have spamd crash problem, it crashes very often:
Application: spamd.exe,
version 3.3.1.2,
Emin Akbulut wrote:
I also have spamd crash problem, it crashes very often:
Application: spamd.exe,
version 3.3.1.2,
timestamp 0x4b75db31,
modul IPHLPAPI.DLL_unloaded,
version 0.0.0.0,
timestamp 0x49e037a4,
code 0xc005,
error loc 0x74f83386,
eventid 0xe98,
app startup
On 15-Jul-2010, at 00:59, Daniel Lemke wrote:
You may want to solve this by increasing your --max-spare, at least this
works for our servers.
Or sneaking in one night and ninja-installing FreeBSD/Linux on all those
windows boxes…
Not that I'm suggesting that, of course.
:D
--
Q: Does
I don't know the default --max-spare value if any and what do you suggest,
Daniel?
Our MTA thread limit is 6.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Daniel Lemke le...@jam-software.comwrote:
Emin Akbulut wrote:
I also have spamd crash problem, it crashes very often:
Application: spamd.exe,
LuKreme wrote:
On 15-Jul-2010, at 00:59, Daniel Lemke wrote:
You may want to solve this by increasing your --max-spare, at least
this
works for our servers.
Or sneaking in one night and ninja-installing FreeBSD/Linux on all those
windows boxes…
Not that I'm suggesting that, of
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Matt Kettler wrote:
On 7/14/2010 11:27 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
I noticed randomly while I was testing SA. All I did is below:
WinSpamC realspam.txt result1.txt
NET STOP Spamassassin
NET START Spamassassin
WinSpamC realspam.txt result2.txt
WinSpamC realspam.txt
spamassassin.exe always calculates the same/correct score.
spamd second run reports only a few tests. Is it OK? I mean
spamd runs all test but only adds which one increases score
to it's report? Or these tests are processed tests list only?
First run has tons of tests, second run has only 5 tests.
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Emin Akbulut wrote:
spamassassin.exe always calculates the same/correct score.
Good... Goood.
pamd second run reports only a few tests. Is it OK? I mean spamd runs
all test but only adds which one increases score to it's report? Or
these tests are processed tests
I run SA Win32 port 3.3.1 by JAM Software on Windows Server 2008 64 bit.
Spamassassin.exe always calculates the same score, coz User_Prefs file is
under my docs (C:\Users\ea\.spamassassin)
However spamd.exe -which runs as service- calculates the right score at
first time
then score goes very low
On 7/14/2010 8:42 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
I run SA Win32 port 3.3.1 by JAM Software on Windows Server 2008 64 bit.
Spamassassin.exe always calculates the same score, coz User_Prefs file is
under my docs (C:\Users\ea\.spamassassin)
However spamd.exe -which runs as service- calculates the
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
First run:
---
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=25.7 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT
What sticks out to me is that most of the missing score hits on
Emin Akbulut wrote:
However spamd.exe -which runs as service- calculates the right score at
first time
then score goes very low at subsequent checks. spamd runs under system
account
and it's User_Prefs file is located
under C:\Windows\SysWOW64\config\systemprofile\.spamassassin
I have
I noticed randomly while I was testing SA. All I did is below:
WinSpamC realspam.txt result1.txt
NET STOP Spamassassin
NET START Spamassassin
WinSpamC realspam.txt result2.txt
WinSpamC realspam.txt result3.txt
result1: under 6.3
result2: very high
result3: under 6.3
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010
On 7/14/2010 11:27 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
I noticed randomly while I was testing SA. All I did is below:
WinSpamC realspam.txt result1.txt
NET STOP Spamassassin
NET START Spamassassin
WinSpamC realspam.txt result2.txt
WinSpamC realspam.txt result3.txt
result1: under 6.3
result2:
31 matches
Mail list logo
