On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:01, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:00, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
It might be useful to compare with MTA MARK and see what the status of
that proposal currently is:
Justin Mason wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:00, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
It might be useful to compare with MTA MARK and see what the status of
that proposal currently is:
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
It might be useful to compare with MTA MARK and see what the status of
that proposal currently is:
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/
Amazing. Justin, you must have known about that one - you can't
possibly have
On 02/11, Henrik K wrote:
method of whitelisting. You can't seriously expect to block on some
attribute that not everyone can or bothers to change (DNS). None of this
On 11.02.10 16:34, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I am not suggesting that anyone block anything based on MTX at this time.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:00, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
It might be useful to compare with MTA MARK and see what the status of
that proposal currently is:
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/
- dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
--
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want,
and deserve to get it good and hard. - H. L. Mencken
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Like the simplicity and it does appear to be a great idea. Why do
On 02/11, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Like the simplicity and it does appear to be a great idea. Why do you
believe SPF or DKIM generate breakage ?
Thank you.
SPF breakage occurs where a user has configured one of their email
addresses to automatically forward their mail to another of their email
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:00:05PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have to do
is to require legimate relays to have a FCrDNS entry with an actually
identifiable name, like starting with smtp.
Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:00:05PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com
wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have
to do is to require legimate relays to have a FCrDNS entry with an
actually identifiable name, like
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:45:32PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:00:05PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com
wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have
to do is to require legimate
On 02/11, Henrik K wrote:
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have to do
is to require legimate relays to have a FCrDNS entry with an actually
identifiable name, like starting with smtp. Much simpler to take advantage
of that and it actually is somewhat used today.
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 02/11, Henrik K wrote:
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have to do
is to require legimate relays to have a FCrDNS entry with an actually
identifiable name, like starting with smtp. Much simpler to take advantage
of that and
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
You know, just for a moment I thought I would take a look, just for
curiosity sake, and instead got this moronic jack-ass ATTITUDE page.
You are welcome to your opinions on browsers, and are free to whine
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
You know, just for a moment I thought I would take a look, just for
curiosity sake, and instead got this moronic jack-ass ATTITUDE page.
What page were you looking at? All I see at that
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:57:47AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 02/11, Henrik K wrote:
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have to do
is to require legimate relays to have a FCrDNS entry with an actually
identifiable name,
From: Charles Gregory cgreg...@hwcn.org
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:55:10 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
You know, just for a moment I thought I would take a look, just for
curiosity sake, and instead got
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:00:05PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
On 11.02.10 16:06, Henrik K wrote:
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have to do
is to require legimate relays to have a FCrDNS entry with an actually
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:25:07PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:00:05PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
On 11.02.10 16:06, Henrik K wrote:
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have to do
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:00:05PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
On 11.02.10 16:06, Henrik K wrote:
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have to
do
is to require legimate relays to have a FCrDNS entry with an
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:42:44PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:00:05PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
On 11.02.10 16:06, Henrik K wrote:
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
What page were you looking at? All I see at that URL is a fairly
straightforward description of how to implement his MTX system.
The page 'redirects' to this one: http://www.chaosreigns.com/fail
It's a rant page telling the visitor that you cannot
On 11-Feb-2010, at 09:55, Charles Gregory wrote:
You are welcome to your opinions on browsers, and are free to whine about the
evils of microsoft all you want, but if you are going to post a link
with the intent for the 'average' person to read it, then you better make it
*accessible* to
On 11-Feb-2010, at 11:11, Charles Gregory wrote:
It's a rant page telling the visitor that you cannot read the site using
Internet Explorer,
Good. Get a real browser.
with major (large font) attitude that this is the fault of the browser.
It is, and this is explained clearly. IE does not
LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Feb-2010, at 11:11, Charles Gregory wrote:
It's a rant page telling the visitor that you cannot read the site using
Internet Explorer,
Good. Get a real browser.
with major (large font) attitude that this is the fault of the browser.
It is, and
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, LuKreme wrote:
Erm.. The string microsoft doesn't even exist on that page.
No Microsoft browser supports this 9 year old standard.
Obviously you are't using IE and so you weren't subjected to the
arrogant refusal of his server to deliver the requested page.
(shrug)
- C
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, LuKreme wrote:
It's a rant page telling the visitor that you cannot read the site
using Internet Explorer,
Good. Get a real browser.
Like I said, he (and you) can rant all you want about the evils of
Microsoft, and frankly I wouldn't be inclined to argue with you. (grin)
On 02/11, Henrik K wrote:
method of whitelisting. You can't seriously expect to block on some
attribute that not everyone can or bothers to change (DNS). None of this
Correct.
I am not suggesting that anyone block anything based on MTX at this time.
I suggest using it for whitelisting (small
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I would blame whoever set up the website. The page in question does not
even attempt to use the features that the fail page refers to.
(nod) I guess that really says it all
Thanks for mentioning this. Now my 'vague feeling' is confirmed.
- C
Bowie Bailey wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Feb-2010, at 11:11, Charles Gregory wrote:
It's a rant page telling the visitor that you cannot read the site using
Internet Explorer,
Good. Get a real browser.
with major (large font) attitude that this is the fault of the browser.
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
--
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want,
and deserve to get it good and hard. - H. L. Mencken
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
30 matches
Mail list logo
