Charles Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Helmut Schneider wrote:
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
What distinguishes 'certain mails'? Length? Content? Mime
attachements?
It's around 1 of 1000, I caught one that was a HTML mail, 100kB, no
Helmut Schneider wrote:
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[...]
Any idea where to start?
Appendix: I set up a fresh and clean FreeBSD 8.0 with only SA 3.3.1 and
Perl 5.10.1_1 and the problem still persists. I then removed all
packages, compiled perl
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I then started from scratch and tried with SA 3.2.5. The particular
body_tests take only 5 seconds (instead of 30).
As I mentioned before, I noticed this difference myself, and presumed it
was just a characteristic of the 'improved' logic for
On Thursday 03 June 2010 18:02:23 Charles Gregory wrote:
As I mentioned before, I noticed this difference myself, and presumed it
was just a characteristic of the 'improved' logic for deep-scanning the
body of emails, and perhaps just a larger number of rules than before
Though I am still
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Mark Martinec wrote:
Here is one common problem of 'certain mail messages'
taking a long time to process - unresolvable for now:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5590
Sorry, but that bug has been around since 3.2.3 - it would not explain a
sudden
On 6/3/2010 12:02 PM, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I then started from scratch and tried with SA 3.2.5. The particular
body_tests take only 5 seconds (instead of 30).
As I mentioned before, I noticed this difference myself, and presumed
it was just a
On 6/3/2010 7:52 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[...]
Any idea where to start?
Appendix: I set up a fresh and clean FreeBSD 8.0 with only SA 3.3.1 and
Perl 5.10.1_1 and the problem still
Helmut Schneider wrote:
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
I might have been able to catch a non-confident example mail[1] (bad
example because of the size, but an example).
While SA 3.2.5 needs ~45 seconds, with SA 3.3.1:
Jun 4 03:36:41.029 [56496]
Hi,
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint
/var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt
Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and
is no longer supported, ignoring.
Jun 2
Quoting Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de:
Hi,
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint
/var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt
Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and
David Michaels wrote:
Quoting Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de:
Hi,
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[...]
timing: total 36840 ms - init: 3827 (10.4%), parse: 43 (0.1%),
extract_message_metadata: 822 (2.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 178
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Helmut Schneider wrote:
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
What distinguishes 'certain mails'? Length? Content? Mime attachements?
So the body tests take ~ 30 of 37 seconds. It's not a load problem,
I noticed a significant
On Wed 02 Jun 2010 09:52:51 PM CEST, Helmut Schneider wrote
Hi,
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint
doh :)
- != --
/var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt
Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn:
13 matches
Mail list logo
