Re: Scoring for rule SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-05-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Kelson wrote on Fri, 12 May 2006 14:23:55 -0700: I count two: The ü in für and the ´ in MODEL´S, which is different from the ASCII single quote/apostrophe: ' Ah, you are right, I missed the ü, it's too natural for me. Nevertheless too many implies a bit more than *two* for me. I can't

Re: Scoring for rule SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-05-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Thu, 11 May 2006 13:49:11 -0400: fwiw, the 8-bit characters ought to be encoded in base64 or quoted-printable. then the rule wouldn't hit. I just found the same problem here with a whole bunch of messages coming from the same source. It seems the rule hits on *one*

Re: Scoring for rule SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-05-12 Thread Kelson
Kai Schaetzl wrote: The subject line hitting in the case of our customer was: Bewerbung für INS-2006-05-4, MODEL´S GESUCHT!!! I can identify only one character that is outside the ASCII range. I count two: The ü in für and the ´ in MODEL´S, which is different from the ASCII single

Re: Scoring for rule SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-05-12 Thread jdow
From: Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Theo Van Dinter wrote on Thu, 11 May 2006 13:49:11 -0400: fwiw, the 8-bit characters ought to be encoded in base64 or quoted-printable. then the rule wouldn't hit. I just found the same problem here with a whole bunch of messages coming from the same

Scoring for rule SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-05-11 Thread Keith Dunnett
* 4.3 SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Subject: has too many raw illegal characters * 0.0 DK_SIGNED Domain Keys: message has an unverified signature * -0.0 DK_VERIFIED Domain Keys: signature passes verification * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE

Re: Scoring for rule SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-05-11 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:47:15PM +0200, Keith Dunnett wrote: I've recently had a couple of false positives caused by this rule, and think it may be scored too highly for a single check. The e-mails in question were in Spanish, and the Spanish word for linguistics has two accented characters

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-15 Thread Милен Панков
Matt Kettler написа: Note that SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS is NOT concerned with what language or character set is used. It is concerned about it not being encoded properly. Per RFC specifications, all characters in email-headers that aren't in the normal ascii ranges must be QP encoded. This rule

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-15 Thread Loren Wilton
Can You please point which RFC is this and what exactly 'QP encoding' means. Someone else can doubtless point to the RFC, but as an example, your name in the From address is encoded in Quoted Printable encoding. I've added some spaces to it below so that your mail client doesn't turn it back

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-15 Thread Craig Morrison
Милен Панков wrote: Matt Kettler написа: Note that SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS is NOT concerned with what language or character set is used. It is concerned about it not being encoded properly. Per RFC specifications, all characters in email-headers that aren't in the normal ascii ranges must be QP

RE: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-15 Thread Randal, Phil
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Cc: Matt Kettler Subject: Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Matt Kettler написа: Note that SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS is NOT concerned with what language or character set is used. It is concerned about it not being encoded properly. Per RFC specifications, all characters

RE: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-15 Thread Randal, Phil
: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Милен Панков wrote: Matt Kettler написа: Note that SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS is NOT concerned with what language or character set is used. It is concerned about it not being encoded properly. Per RFC specifications, all characters in email-headers that aren't in the normal

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-15 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 03:29:45PM -, Randal, Phil wrote: Can You please point which RFC is this and what exactly 'QP encoding' means. http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html Refer to Section 3.2.2 for information on quoted-pairs. QP in this case does not mean quoted pairs, it means

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-15 Thread Craig McLean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philip Prindeville wrote: [snip] I mean it's not X.400, right? ;-) Thank the Gods... C. - -- Craig McLeanhttp://fukka.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where the fun never starts Powered by FreeBSD, and GIN! -BEGIN PGP

SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-14 Thread Милен Панков
Hi to all, I'm using spamassassin for years without any serious problems. Except for one. My users write messages mostly in bulgarian and the 'SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS' rule very often stops good mail. I have put in my local.cf the line 'ok_languages bg en', but it doesn't fix the problem. For now I

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-14 Thread Matt Kettler
and the 'SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS' rule very often stops good mail. I have put in my local.cf the line 'ok_languages bg en', but it doesn't fix the problem. No, if anything that will make your problem WORSE. The default here is all. By declaring an ok_languages you're limiting the number of acceptable languages. Also note

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-14 Thread Милен Панков
messages mostly in bulgarian and the 'SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS' rule very often stops good mail. I have put in my local.cf the line 'ok_languages bg en', but it doesn't fix the problem. No, if anything that will make your problem WORSE. The default here is all. By declaring an ok_languages you're limiting

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-14 Thread Philip Prindeville
score SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS 0 to your local.cf. Well this happens mostly when we receive mail from some webmails for example Yahoo, so I'm stuck with the second option, which I'm already using. Thanks, Milen It's an issue, to be sure. And people need to be edumacated. I recently pointed