Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar at fantomas.sk writes:
You haven't read Matt's explanation of why it wasn't a good idea, did you?
There are rules with negative scores, which can puch the score back to the
ham, e.g. whitelist. Would you like to stop scoring before e.g. whitelist is
checked?
I
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Matt Kettler mkettler_sa at verizon.net writes:
In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this
(SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added):
On 22.09.09 11:46, ArtemGr wrote:
That would be a nice
ArtemGr wrote:
I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests
when the required_score is not yet reached.
For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first,
and if the score is lower than the required_score,
then do the DCC and RAZOR2 tests.
Is it possible?
Matt Kettler mkettler_sa at verizon.net writes:
In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this
(SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added):
That would be a nice optimization: most of the spam we receive have a 10 score.
It seems a real waste of
Matt Kettler mkettler_sa at verizon.net writes:
In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this
(SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added):
On 22.09.09 11:46, ArtemGr wrote:
That would be a nice optimization: most of the spam we receive have a
