On 27 Jun 2018, at 22:17, J Doe wrote:
I went back to “man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf” and can see mention
of the shortcircuit plugin . . . is there more documentation (perhaps
in another man or perldoc), where the shortcircuit keyword is
mentioned ?
perldoc
On 28/06/2018 04:17, J Doe wrote:
I went back to “man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf” and can see mention of the
shortcircuit plugin . . . is there more documentation (perhaps in another man
or perldoc), where the shortcircuit keyword is mentioned ?
I'd say a good starting point would be
> On Jun 27, 2018, at 6:20 AM, Daniele Duca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd say that a better solution would be to use shortcircuit:
> body __BODY_TEST1 . . .
> body __BODY_TEST2 . . .
> meta CUSTOM_RULE1(__BODY_TEST1 && __BODY_TEST2)
> shortcircuit CUSTOM_RULE1 spam
>
> At least that saves
On 27/06/2018 02:15, J Doe wrote:
Hi John,
Ok, good to know.
Is it possible with the SA grammar to have variables ? I was thinking
I’d have something like the following in my: /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
POISON_PILL = 100
Hi,
I'd say that a better solution would be to use
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, J Doe wrote:
On Jun 26, 2018, at 12:13 AM, John Hardin mailto:jhar...@impsec.org>> wrote:
My thinking here is that if this rule ever passes, it should not add a small
value to the score but push the score up to the value
that required_score is set to. Th
> On Jun 26, 2018, at 12:13 AM, John Hardin <mailto:jhar...@impsec.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if it is possible to assign a score to a custom rule that
>> will evaluate to the value that required_score is set to.
>>
>>
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, J Doe wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if it is possible to assign a score to a custom rule that will
evaluate to the value that required_score is set to.
My thinking here is that if this rule ever passes, it should not add a small
value to the score but push the score up
Hello,
I was wondering if it is possible to assign a score to a custom rule that will
evaluate to the value that required_score is set to.
My thinking here is that if this rule ever passes, it should not add a small
value to the score but push the score up to the value
that required_score
I have recently updated to 3.2.4 - for some reason my required_score keeps
reverting to 5, basically ignoring or everriding the settings in local.cf.
The ruleset 10_default_prefs.cf has these settings, and this is where it
appears to come from. While I have commented out the offending line(s
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Jefferson Davis wrote:
I have recently updated to 3.2.4 - for some reason my required_score keeps
reverting to 5, basically ignoring or everriding the settings in local.cf.
Some Linux (presumed) disties have non-standard configuration
directories - but when you manually
I use spamassassin3.2.1 and simscan1.2
My value of required_score doesn't work in
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.
I couldn't change required_score's value. The server still looks at old
value which I must have been set it.
I checked that the server reads /usr/local/etc/mail
-Original Message-
From: James E. Pratt
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:36 PM
To: 'Yavuz Maslak'
Subject: RE: Why can't I change value of required_score ?
-Original Message-
From: Yavuz Maslak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:33 PM
Apologies, I meant to send this to the qmail-toaster list... :(
-Original Message-
From: James E. Pratt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: Why can't I change value of required_score ?
-Original Message
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really do
per-user configs.
spamc -u will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with
multiple users, such as when there are several recipients for a single
message, unless you can get the MTA to split
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:20:26 +0100
Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really
do per-user configs.
spamc -u will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with
multiple users, such as when there
Hi,
I want to give users control of the required_score variable. I am using
Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis.
I have read the document http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL and
have the tests working OKAY.
executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM userpref WHERE username
=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e
/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
Hope this is what you were after...
Thanks,
- David
mouss-2 wrote:
David.Sharpe wrote:
Hi, I want to give users control of the required_score variable. I am
using Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis. I have read
David.Sharpe wrote:
Hi, I want to give users control of the required_score variable. I am
using Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis. I have read the document
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL and have the tests
working OKAY. /executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM userpref
David.Sharpe wrote:
Within postfix/master.cf I have the following lines :
smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamassassin
This pushes mail through the following lines :
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really do per-user
configs.
spamc -u will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with multiple
users, such as when there are several recipients for a single message, unless
you can get the MTA to split the message up into multiple
get the MTA to split the message up into multiple messages, but that
is problematic/has pros+cons assuming the MTA will even let you do it.
So in short, if you want per-user configs, switch to running SA at the MDA
(procmail, maildrop, etc.)
If you -only- need Per-User required_score you may
David,
I want to give users control of the required_score variable.
I am using Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis.
...
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e
/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
If your
Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:36 PM maillist wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
Check for either /etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf or
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
Jason A.
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:36 PM maillist wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
Check for either /etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf or
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrator
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
I have been running spamassassin for over 2 years now, and suddenly, the
required score has changed. I have it set to 7.0, but it has suddenly
changed back to the default of 5.0. I only
Greetings,
Am I correct in saying that the proper way to set a default
required_score is in the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file?
I'm running SA 3.2.0 and I seem to be unable to change the default
required_score. I'm using spamc/spamd for processing via simscan.
Per-user rules are enabled
When looking up required_score info, as most know, it say that the default
is 5.0 and that it is considered aggressive in various circumstances
Used to be called required_hits
When I first started using SA I was told that as an ISP going in the 4.0
range give or take a little was an excellent
R Lists06 wrote:
When looking up required_score info, as most know, it say that the default
is 5.0 and that it is considered aggressive in various circumstances
Used to be called required_hits
When I first started using SA I was told that as an ISP going in the 4.0
range give or take a little
-Original Message-
From: R Lists06 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 4:45 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: required_score aggressive ??
When looking up required_score info, as most know, it say that the
default
is 5.0 and that it is considered
I use a required_score of 3 and so far have had zero positives (more
than 3 years running).
I have customers that also run 3 and have opted to have the server
/discard/ the message (not quarantine, but /DISCARD/) if it is
identified as spam. So far none of those users have complained about
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Ray Anderson wrote:
I use a required_score of 3 and so far have had zero positives (more
than 3 years running).
I have customers that also run 3 and have opted to have the server
/discard/ the message (not quarantine, but /DISCARD/) if it is
identified as spam. So
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:36:24PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
Is there a way to set the required_score on the fly between each email
message test?
You haven't stated what you're trying to do, but you could update the
user preference between spamassassin/spamc runs
Is there a way to set the required_score on the fly between each email
message test?
I tried changing the required_score in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
but it is unsurprisingly not rescanned/reloaded between each message
that is tested. It would really be cool (not to mention extremely
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:36:24PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
Is there a way to set the required_score on the fly between each email
message test?
You haven't stated what you're trying to do, but you could update the
user preference between spamassassin/spamc runs, depending on your
tagged_above=2 required=6.31
tests=[DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12=1.498, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD=2.152]
It's like the required_score option is ignore...
What happen?
That isn't a standard header (tagged_above indicates you're using some other
program to call SA), so I'd look at that to figure out
Julien Michaux wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have a problem using spamassassin. The required_score option
doesn't work...
I use the lastest spamassassin version, postfix 2.2, clamav,
courier-imap and openLDAP. My operating system is Debian testing with
kernel 2.6.12.
I set
Michaux Julien wrote:
Yes I use amavis...
So it's in the amavis configuration that I have to set the
required_score? Do you know it is?
Search amavisd.conf for sa_tag_level. This should find all of the
score settings for amavis.
Amavis is much more flexible than SA alone and has more than
All,
I have set required_score to 8.0 and restarted spamd. But new email coming in is showing a require of 4.5:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=3.1.0
Hi,
how do I reduce the required_score from 5.0 to a lower value for a
special domain? I'd like to set required_score to 4.3 for all incoming
mails to mydomain.org. All other domains should require the standard
score of 5.0.
Thanks,
Marcus
Marcus Sobchak wrote:
how do I reduce the required_score from 5.0 to a lower value for a
special domain? I'd like to set required_score to 4.3 for all incoming
mails to mydomain.org. All other domains should require the standard
score of 5.0.
I suppose you could make a rule that matches
HELP! I cant get this figured out for the life of me. Here is what I
have...
I have SA 3.0.2, using a Postgres database to store user preferences. When
I run a test instance and pass a test message to it (using spamc and spamd)
and the blacklist_from entries never get read...
Here is my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
debug: Conf::SQL: executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM
userpref WHERE username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' OR username =
'$GLOBAL' OR username = '%'||'architel.com' ORDER BY username ASC
If you run the query above in psql
preference| value
-+
required_score | 4.0
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
score USER_IN_BLACKLIST | 100
required_score | 3.0
report_safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
preference | value
-+ required_score
| 4.0 blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED] score USER_IN_BLACKLIST |
100 required_score | 3.0 report_safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
spamd -x -q -C /etc/mail/test/ --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/test -p
Are you sure you mean -C /etc/mail/test/? Normally that would be
something like /usr/share/spamassassin, which is where all of the
default .cf/rules files are
You, sir, are a GENIUS!
That fixed it perfectly. Thank you very much! Name the brand of e-beer and
I will send it your way.
- Kevin
On 6/7/05 1:00 PM, Michael Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
spamd -x -q -C
Kevin Marvin wrote:
HELP! I cant get this figured out for the life of me. Here is what I
have...
I have SA 3.0.2, using a Postgres database to store user preferences. When
I run a test instance and pass a test message to it (using spamc and spamd)
and the blacklist_from entries never get
JamesDR wrote:
Kevin Marvin wrote:
Sorry list,
Michael set me straight on allow_user_rules :-D
--
Thanks,
James
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JamesDR wrote:
Kevin Marvin wrote:
HELP! I cant get this figured out for the life of me. Here is
what I have...
I have SA 3.0.2, using a Postgres database to store user
preferences. When I run a test instance and pass a test message
to it
Why Mail::SpamAssassin module always giving output
spam score 0? while if i run spamassassin from console
to check the same sample-spam file it give spam score
4?
--- Markus Hardiyanto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
can i use Mail::SpamAssassin to setup
required_score?
i already read the manual
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:05:34AM -0700, Markus Hardiyanto wrote:
Why Mail::SpamAssassin module always giving output
spam score 0? while if i run spamassassin from console
to check the same sample-spam file it give spam score
4?
Mail::SpamAssassin doesn't actually check your mail. Please
can i use Mail::SpamAssassin to setup required_score?
i already read the manual but still don't know how to
do it.
i creating a perl script that calling
Mail::SpamAssassin to check emails is it a spam or
not.
i want that i can configure the required_score from
my script, not from /etc
52 matches
Mail list logo
