On 05/18/2013 08:33 PM, David Chapman wrote:
On 5/18/2013 12:01 PM, Zé wrote:
On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches in
development.
No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track changes made to the
contents of a
On May 19, 2013, at 3:20, Zé jose.pas...@gmx.com wrote:
You are confused. This discussion is about how subversion lacks any support
for branching, which is quite obvious to anyone who understands and
acknowledges that all subversion does is track revision changes to a file
system.
I use
On 05/18/2013 09:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
So what's the actual problem (or problems) with SVN's branching and
tagging? Where does it hurt your workflow? What would make SVN not
hurt you in that way?
Please be concrete, and give examples of what really bothers you as a
user or an admin in
On 05/19/2013 09:33 AM, Dave Huang wrote:
I use branches in SVN all the time… you might take
Read the thread.
--
Zé
On 19.05.2013 10:51, Zé wrote:
On 05/18/2013 09:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
So what's the actual problem (or problems) with SVN's branching and
tagging? Where does it hurt your workflow? What would make SVN not
hurt you in that way?
Please be concrete, and give examples of what really
On 05/19/2013 09:51 AM, Zé wrote:
Again, the problem is that subversion does not support branches or tags.
All it supports is basic file operations on a file system, and they
are not adequate for simulating branches or tags.
Regarding tags, there's a better way to handle them in subversion:
On 05/19/2013 10:01 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
If Subversion
does not support your workflow, then replace Subversion, or change your
workflow.
Did you even browsed the thread? This whole thread is on how subversion
does not support branching, and how subversion would be even better than
what
On 19.05.2013 11:08, Zé wrote:
On 05/19/2013 09:51 AM, Zé wrote:
Again, the problem is that subversion does not support branches or tags.
All it supports is basic file operations on a file system, and they
are not adequate for simulating branches or tags.
Regarding tags, there's a better
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 02:08:57PM +0400, Boris Lytochkin wrote:
It is possible to force svnserve daemon to exit using trivial (and valid) TCP
session:
Thanks for your bug report and patch, Boris.
We'll release updates soon that include a fix for this issue.
In the future, please report
Guten Tag Zé,
am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013 um 10:20 schrieben Sie:
You are confused. This discussion is about how subversion lacks any
support for branching, which is quite obvious to anyone who understands
and acknowledges that all subversion does is track revision changes to a
file
On 19.05.2013 11:16, Zé wrote:
On 05/19/2013 10:01 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
If Subversion
does not support your workflow, then replace Subversion, or change your
workflow.
Did you even browsed the thread? This whole thread is on how
subversion does not support branching, and how subversion
Guten Tag Zé,
am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013 um 10:51 schrieben Sie:
7) This is the problem:
[...]
This was surely not the problem, the thread started because of
changed revision numbers, you seem to be the only who wants to remove
history of changes.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorsten Schöning
--
Guten Tag Andreas Krey,
am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 22:41 schrieben Sie:
You mean like 'I expect tags to be immutable out of the box, and have
the VCS not modify them with perfectly normal operations, at least not
without adding -f or something to them'?
This sounds like Subversion
Guten Tag Andreas Krey,
am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 22:55 schrieben Sie:
All that structure is implicit. Unless someone tells you, you
have no ways to deduce which paths of a subversion repository
are meaningful to check out and which aren't.
But that's nearly the same with any other SCMs
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Zé jose.pas...@gmx.com wrote:
On 05/18/2013 09:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
So what's the actual problem (or problems) with SVN's branching and
tagging? Where does it hurt your workflow? What would make SVN not
hurt you in that way?
Please be concrete, and
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Zé jose.pas...@gmx.com wrote:
On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches in
development.
No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track changes made to the contents
of a directory and
On Sun, 19 May 2013 09:20:31 +, Zé wrote:
...
file system. What you are insistingly referring to as branches is
nothing more than a copy of a particular subdirectory (i.e., the trunk)
into another subdirectory (i.e., branches), which is nothing more than a
plain recursive directory
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Zé jose.pas...@gmx.com wrote:
Besides
that, from my understanding filesystems do provide something which
could be argued as support for branches and tags because branches are
simply just work on something based on something other, which is
implemented as
18 matches
Mail list logo
