I have now fixed the infinite loop, and again did the update from Java 5 to
Java 6. This time all seems to be working like a charm!
Along with fixing the infinite loop, I have dug a little deeper into the JVM
arguments. I found the following article particularly useful:
Jesse Klaasse wrote:
I have now fixed the infinite loop, and again did the update from Java 5 to
Java 6. This time all seems to be working like a charm!
Along with fixing the infinite loop, I have dug a little deeper into the JVM
arguments. I found the following article particularly useful:
Hi,
For Apache httpd the MultiViews option can be set in the
configuration-file. This allows resources to be called without providing
the the file-extension in the URL, e.g. the URL
http://localhost/images/myImage; returns the file myImage.png in the
images folder (same as calling
Hi All,
Is it possible to configure a global JNDI resource which is loaded from a
webapp?
I want to keep all related libraries for the resource in a web application, not
in shared library path, but I want the resource to be shared by other web
applications.
The primary reason is because there
On 26/01/2010 10:02, Woonsan Ko wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible to configure a global JNDI resource which is loaded from a
webapp?
If it is defined in a webapp, it's not a global JNDI resource.
So, no.
p
I want to keep all related libraries for the resource in a web application, not
in
what ever I use localhost:8080, or direct 192.168.0.127:8080
2010/1/16 Ziggy zigg...@gmail.com
Is it slow when you try to access it directly using the IP address?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
sorry for my later response because I reinstalled my computer... the
situation is still slow, I got mad...
2010/1/26 Yu Chao yves0...@gmail.com
what ever I use localhost:8080, or direct 192.168.0.127:8080
2010/1/16 Ziggy zigg...@gmail.com
Is it slow when you try to access it directly using
- Original Message
From: Pid p...@pidster.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 12:21:20 PM
Subject: Re: Global JNDI resource loaded from a webapp
On 26/01/2010 10:02, Woonsan Ko wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible to configure a global JNDI resource which
Oops:
sry...@srv:~$ java -version
java version 1.5.0
gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
I also added the -XX:+UseCompressedOops JVM option (as suggested in the
Confluence article I mentioned earlier). BTW, for those who want to know:
this option is available since update 14 of JDK 6 (see also
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u14.html), you don't need the
Performance branch as
I have two filters within my web.xml--one uses a sitemesh plugin and the
other uses a wikiUrlSessionIdFilter plugin---from sitemesh.jar and
jboss-seam.jar respectively. If I place the two jars in tomcat/common/lib
directory and start the server, I get ClassNotFoundExceptions when Tomcat
tries to
From: Richard Cooke [mailto:richa...@saratoga.co.za]
Subject: Re: Disabled use of AcceptEx() WinSock2 API error on Windows
7
The zip version starts without any problems using startup.bat.
I did get Tomcat 6.0.20 running as a service on Win7, with a few caveats:
1) The OS is Win7 Ultimate
Hi,
In our company, we are using apache tomcat as a windows service. We defined jvm
parameters --JvmMs 512 --JvmMx 512 in service.bat. But application is using
600,980 KB memory. I expect the application not to use more then 512 MB.
Can you explain me, the reason of this stuation.
On 26/01/2010 14:25, ssmith wrote:
Spacing improves legibility.
I have two filters within my web.xml--one uses a sitemesh plugin and the
other uses a wikiUrlSessionIdFilter plugin---from sitemesh.jar and
jboss-seam.jar respectively. If I place the two jars in tomcat/common/lib
directory and
On 26/01/2010 15:12, Hüsnü Þentürk wrote:
Hi,
In our company, we are using apache tomcat as a windows service. We defined jvm
parameters --JvmMs 512 --JvmMx 512 in service.bat. But application is using
600,980 KB memory. I expect the application not to use more then 512 MB.
Can you explain
From: Steve Ryder [mailto:sry...@jsrsys.com]
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5 org.apache.naming.ResourceRef cannot be cast to
javax.sql.DataSource
Oops:
sry...@srv:~$ java -version
java version 1.5.0
gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)
A very big oops.
I need to replace the
From: Jesse Klaasse [mailto:jesse.klaa...@indicia.nl]
Subject: Re: Tomcat 100% CPU usage after moving from Java 5 to 6
I found the following article particularly useful:
http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Garbage+Collector+Performance+Issues
Unfortunately, that article is so full
2010/1/26 Hüsnü Þentürk husnusent...@yahoo.com
Hi,
In our company, we are using apache tomcat as a windows service. We defined
jvm parameters --JvmMs 512 --JvmMx 512 in service.bat. But application is
using 600,980 KB memory. I expect the application not to use more then 512
MB.
Can you
Hi Chuck, thanks for your extensive comments about the JVM options..
n828cl wrote:
-Xms10240m -Xmx10240m
That's a very large heap; shouldn't hurt as long as you have enough RAM to
support it all without paging. (But see below for use with compressed
OOPs.)
This shouldn't be a
Hi,
I recently updated from Tomcat 6.0.20 to 6.0.24.
Now some jsps with jsf tags are not compiling anymore.
Following tag results in a JasperException in 6.0.24 but compiles fine with
older versions:
h:outputText value=\\
Stack:
Caused by: org.apache.jasper.JasperException:
Hello all. Several days ago we saw some strange behavior with an Oracle
database after the restart of a tomcat webapp. Immediately after restart,
Oracle was processing the query for a certain page using an improper index that
caused the page/query to hang. We've taken a look at the
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jesse Klaasse jesse.klaa...@indicia.nl wrote:
Hi Chuck, thanks for your extensive comments about the JVM options..
On a site note... I have made the observation that the JVM is
performing best without any explicit gc settings. Most time explicit
GC settings
I have a WAR file created by Grails Web Framework that should (and has)
worked over the Internet simply by placing the file in the Tomcat 'webapps'
directory.
When I place the WAR file and restart the server, the file is expanded
correctly into a directory, but when I browse to its URL, I get an
2010/1/26 Yu Chao yves0...@gmail.com:
sorry for my later response because I reinstalled my computer... the
situation is still slow, I got mad...
1. Your operating system = ?
2. Your Java runtime vendor and its version = ?
3. What are you trying to do, step by step. At what step do you
observe
2010/1/26 Leon Rosenberg rosenberg.l...@googlemail.com
Another customer of mine was playing with gc settings for nearly a
year, because his tomcats collection times went higher and higher, and
after a short look at the heap dump with jmap and jhat, we found out
that he had 100.000.000
Dan -
I'd look into why Oracle took an improper index (whatever that means).
There is nothing in Tomcat/JDK that would mess with your queries that
I'm aware of.
I'd also investigate all the standard reasons why Oracle recomputes
explain plans for queries - most of which are related to the query.
Sorry, new to Nabble.
I am defining a servlet filter.
I tried to use the existing wars built for Tomcat 5.0.28, but they would not
deploy at all.
So, yes, I rebuilt them for Tomcat 5.5.28.
Yes, I have a servlet-api.jar in the WEB-INF/lib/ and tomcat/common/lib
directories. Eclipse (really
From: AwTIn [mailto:tanner.kl...@gmail.com]
Subject: Grails WAR file not working
What might cause this problem?
Not telling us your exact Tomcat version, the JVM you're using, the OS you're
running on... for starters.
You might want to look in the Tomcat logs.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION
n828cl wrote:
From: AwTIn [mailto:tanner.kl...@gmail.com]
Subject: Grails WAR file not working
What might cause this problem?
Not telling us your exact Tomcat version, the JVM you're using, the OS
you're running on... for starters.
You might want to look in the Tomcat logs.
-
From: AwTIn [mailto:tanner.kl...@gmail.com]
Subject: RE: Grails WAR file not working
Tomcat version: 5.5.7
That's over 4.5 years old, so it might be time to upgrade...
JVM: 1.5.0-b64
That's nearly 6 years old...
OS: Ubuntu
Are you running a real Tomcat (one downloaded from
I've just migrated my tomcat 6.0.18 to 6.0.24 under windows.
When I start tomcat, the log files are created under the $catalina_home\logs
directory. But they are empty (catalina.log, localhost.log, ...).
My tomcat server start correctly and the logs are displayed in the console.
After a while
I've found that it's a known bug :
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48614
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48614
I should have looked in bugzilla before :-).
adding the following lines in the logging.properties (under the conf
directory) solve the problem :
thank you.
1. XP
2. 1.5.0
3. I have a tomcat project, which is running fast on my colleague's
computer, but very slow on mine.
4. examples is very fast.
5. no database, but webservice.
6. IE, chrome, firefox, i tried all of them, same result.
I even copied my colleague's tomcat to my computer,
using my colleague's computer, means using his tomcat to run the project,
not related with brower.
2010/1/27 Yu Chao yves0...@gmail.com
thank you.
1. XP
2. 1.5.0
3. I have a tomcat project, which is running fast on my colleague's
computer, but very slow on mine.
4. examples is very fast.
From: Yu Chao [mailto:yves0...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Tomcat access is very slow
it takes 5 minutes to open a homepage, but in my colleague's
computer, only 10-20 seconds.
Might be network timeouts, waiting for something like DNS resolution (as
someone else already suggested, I believe).
Has anybody implemented user authentication, using Tomcat (6.0) realms,
via standard old-school Unix passwd files? I've already implemented
JDNIRealm (LDAP) authentication, but some of our sites aren't using LDAP
yet.
Doug Fulford
Software Engineering Specialist
(626)812-2248
On 26/01/2010 07:59, Woonsan Ko wrote:
Does *global JNDI resource* mean that all implementation jars must be in
shared lib path together with the sharable interfaces?
Yes.
If sharable interfaces are in the shared lib path like javax.sql.DataSource
or javax.jcr.Repository, but the real
2010/1/26 Dan Denton dden...@remitpro.com:
Can anyone point out any instances they've had where Tomcat or Tomcat with
the Oracle JDBC driver has exhibited similar behavior?
Is your JDBC driver up-to-date, or as old as the Tomcat version that
you are using? I once solved a thing by updating
On 26/01/2010 13:26, Michael Heinen wrote:
Hi,
I recently updated from Tomcat 6.0.20 to 6.0.24.
Now some jsps with jsf tags are not compiling anymore.
Following tag results in a JasperException in 6.0.24 but compiles fine with
older versions:
h:outputText value=\\
snip/
Question:
Hi Mark,
Tomcat 6.0.24 has been released and the roleNested=true still doesn't work
with roleSearch=(member={1})
Shall I open a bug in https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla bugzilla ?
regards,
Gabriel.
--
View this message in context:
On 26/01/2010 18:12, ssmith wrote:
Sorry, new to Nabble.
I am defining a servlet filter.
I tried to use the existing wars built for Tomcat 5.0.28, but they would not
deploy at all. So, yes, I rebuilt them for Tomcat 5.5.28.
You should rebuild, especially if you are compiling JSPs.
Yes, I
Hi,
I switched from a Windows XP based VPS to a Ubuntu 8.04 linux machine. Both
run Tomcat 6.0.18 and 2.2.8 on tcp4. I now face several problems that might
be related to some low level socket issue but do not necessarily need to. I
am already glad to receive some hints to further boil down the
As far as I know, heap memory is used by objects. On the other hand, our
application has static variables and references to the objects residing in heap
area. Does it mean, static variables and references of our application are
stored outside of reserved 512MB area? Or, the memory outside of
Le 25/01/2010 20:53, Christopher Schultz a écrit :
You've reached way beyond my understanding of RMI at this point. Is it
possible that, like JNDI, you might have trees of objects instead of
just a flat list? In that case, you'd have to recursively
unexport/unbind objects to make sure you got
44 matches
Mail list logo