Hi Mikolaj,
thanks I will do that,
do you know a free tool to generate request for the simulation
of about 30 clients being connected?
Am 16.05.2012 um 21:49 schrieb Mikolaj Rydzewski:
> On 05/16/2012 05:35 PM, Christian Kaufhold wrote:
>> its not intentional but the myfaces App runs on the ser
Hey Pidster,
This is the tag I've used:
It could have been a permissions problem but I gather that if docBase
works, this must work as well permission wise.
Thanks,
Michael
2012/5/17, Pid :
> On 17/05/2012 06:41, Michael Ravits wrote:
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I just can't get this to work.
>> I
On 17/05/2012 06:41, Michael Ravits wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I just can't get this to work.
> Installed Tomcat 7.0.21 on ubuntu 11 using apt-get.
> I deployed ROOT.war and then went on to configure aliases.
> Tried adding the attribute in:
Obvious question: what exactly did you try?
p
> $CAT
On 05/17/2012 07:19 AM, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote:
Hi
Its release of version 1.2.36 but mail subject mention as 1.2.35.
So there was little confusion when first time checked mail.
Yeah, sorry for the typo.
Regards
--
^TM
-
Hi
Its release of version 1.2.36 but mail subject mention as 1.2.35.
So there was little confusion when first time checked mail.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The Apache Tomcat Project is proud to announce the release of version
> 1.2.36
> of Apache Tomcat Connector
The Apache Tomcat Project is proud to announce the release of version 1.2.36
of Apache Tomcat Connectors.
This version fixes few bugs found in 1.2.35 release.
Full details of these changes and new features,
are available in the Apache Tomcat Connectors changelog:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connecto
Here is a good link explaining some of the pros and cons of Wicket. Look
at the part titled "Wicket Session size!"
http://www.small-improvements.com/10-things-about-apache-wicket-i-love
Thanks,
Warren Bell
On 5/16/12 12:49 PM, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 05:35 PM, Christian Kaufhol
A Wicket app that is not written correctly can suck up resources. Wicket
keeps track of pages a user has been on by serializing them, "back
button support". If a page has references to other objects, it
serializes them and so on and so on. It can get real ugly real quick.
Wicket has many built-in
Hello,
And, are the websocket clustering planned for future releases?
Regards
[]'s,
Ronaldo Rigoni
Arquiteto de Software
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark Thomas
Date: Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 7.0.27 websocket cluster
To: Tomcat Users List
On 16/05
On 05/16/2012 05:35 PM, Christian Kaufhold wrote:
its not intentional but the myfaces App runs on the server for years now
and should not cause the problem
I recently deployed a wicket app and now
the server is slowing down when we have about 10 users or so.
So there are two different applicat
On 16/05/2012 19:34, Ronaldo Rigoni ... wrote:
> Thanks Peter and Mark!
>
> The current implementation is a tunnel over http or another socket open?
> I'm planning to port a webgame to tomcat, comunicationg with websockets.
> But, the absence of a session or context turns a little bit hard to work
Thanks Peter and Mark!
The current implementation is a tunnel over http or another socket open?
I'm planning to port a webgame to tomcat, comunicationg with websockets.
But, the absence of a session or context turns a little bit hard to work to.
Many thanks.
[]'s,
Ronaldo Rigoni
Arquiteto de Soft
Currently we don't support it, but I read the Websocket spec that a client can
send Auth and Cookie header!
Peter
Am 16.05.2012 um 20:21 schrieb Mark Thomas:
> On 16/05/2012 18:31, Ronaldo Rigoni ... wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I've a little question about the websocket implementation available in
On 16/05/2012 18:31, Ronaldo Rigoni ... wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've a little question about the websocket implementation available in
> Apache Tomcat 7.0.27.
> There is a way to cluster an websocket application working with a session
> replication feature?
There would be little point since at prese
Interesting and thanks for your response.
We switched back to VM version 1.6.0_07 (64 bit on Slackware) and everything
was fine. For several unrelated reasons, we switched to Tomcat version 6.0.35
and JVM (Oracle) version 1.6.0_16 and all has been fine for a month or so.
The cause remains u
I was facing a problem with similar symptoms - Tomcat 7 (on centos 5, 64 bit,
12 GB RAM) was crashing without anything being logged in catalina.out
In case of JVM crash, there is supposed to be some hs_err_pid.log file but
that was also not getting generated.
Neither were there any OutOfMemory mess
Pid wrote:
On 16/05/2012 18:01, André Warnier wrote:
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/16/12 11:43 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Oh. I always thought that Ajax was purely a client-side thing
(Asynchronous Javascript etc..). Maybe this is only a n
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
> Subject: Re: [OT] tomcat slowing down
> > I was looking at "Wicket" in Wikipedia,
> That sir, is because you are not an Englishman. However, I can assure
> you, that we are very familiar with the wicket. What ho'!
Howzat?
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION
On 16/05/2012 18:01, André Warnier wrote:
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> André,
>>
>> On 5/16/12 11:43 AM, André Warnier wrote:
>>> Oh. I always thought that Ajax was purely a client-side thing
>>> (Asynchronous Javascript etc..). Maybe this i
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/16/12 11:43 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Oh. I always thought that Ajax was purely a client-side thing
(Asynchronous Javascript etc..). Maybe this is only a name
coincidence ?
There are libraries that make acce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/16/12 11:43 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Oh. I always thought that Ajax was purely a client-side thing
> (Asynchronous Javascript etc..). Maybe this is only a name
> coincidence ?
There are libraries that make accepting Ajax requests easie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
Adjusting the subject for better searchability in the archives.
Also adding a link: http://www.apachelounge.com/download/
- -chris
On 5/16/12 11:52 AM, chris derham wrote:
> Steffen from apache lounge asked me to forward this to tomcat
> maili
On 16/05/2012 14:32, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
>
> On 5/15/12 6:07 PM, Pid wrote:
>> On 15/05/2012 16:16, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Vickie,
>>>
>>> (Bringing this back on-list).
>>>
>>> On 5/15/12 10:21 AM, Vickie Troy-McKoy wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:04:33 -0400 From:
>>
On 16/05/2012 16:50, André Warnier wrote:
> Christian Kaufhold wrote:
>> Hi Christopher,
>>
>> its not intentional but the myfaces App runs on the server for years now
>> and should not cause the problem
>> I recently deployed a wicket app and now
>> the server is slowing down when we have about 10
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: [OT] tomcat slowing down
> I always thought that Ajax was purely a client-side thing
It may be so in this case as well - the stack traces include use of HttpClient,
so the webapp may actually be hung up waiting on some external resou
Steffen from apache lounge asked me to forward this to tomcat mailing list
Chris
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steffen
Date: Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk binary
Chris,
Made 1.2.36 Apache 2.4 Win32/Win64 available.
Maybe you can say it on the Tomcat user l
Christian Kaufhold wrote:
Hi Christopher,
its not intentional but the myfaces App runs on the server for years now
and should not cause the problem
I recently deployed a wicket app and now
the server is slowing down when we have about 10 users or so.
I have no idea of whats going on...
Well..
Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
On 16.05.2012 17:11, André Warnier wrote:
Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
It looks you have some ajax requests
Just curious : how do you see that from the OP's stack trace ?
Just a guess, maybe I'm wrong:
org.ajax4jsf.framework.ajax.AjaxViewRoot.processEvents(AjaxViewRoot
Hi Christopher,
its not intentional but the myfaces App runs on the server for years now
and should not cause the problem
I recently deployed a wicket app and now
the server is slowing down when we have about 10 users or so.
I have no idea of whats going on...
2012/5/16 Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian,
On 5/16/12 11:00 AM, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
> On 16.05.2012 16:46, Christian Kaufhold wrote:
>
>> I made a thread dump off the slow server.
>
> You need to investigate it with application developers.
+1
I did notice some of the thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/16/12 5:50 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Nobody can answer that question in the absolute. It all depends on
> how much memory your Tomcat instances really need
(Really, your webapps, not Tomcat).
> to run the applications you put it them, f
On 16.05.2012 17:11, André Warnier wrote:
Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
It looks you have some ajax requests
Just curious : how do you see that from the OP's stack trace ?
Just a guess, maybe I'm wrong:
org.ajax4jsf.framework.ajax.AjaxViewRoot.processEvents(AjaxViewRoot.java:180)
at
Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
On 16.05.2012 16:46, Christian Kaufhold wrote:
I made a thread dump off the slow server.
You need to investigate it with application developers. Examine all
threads and confirm whether application behaves correctly or not.
It looks you have some ajax requests
Just
On 16.05.2012 16:46, Christian Kaufhold wrote:
I made a thread dump off the slow server.
You need to investigate it with application developers. Examine all
threads and confirm whether application behaves correctly or not.
It looks you have some ajax requests - maybe they are executed to
oft
Ok, after upgrade to 7.0.27 I can see in catalina.out
May 16, 2012 6:29:13 PM org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.interceptor.SlowQueryReport
reportSlowQuery
WARNING: Slow Query Report SQL=/* named HQL query HotelView.findPriceById */
select minspohote0_.HOTEL as HOTEL27_, minspohote0_.ID_CITY_DEP as I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 5/15/12 6:07 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 15/05/2012 16:16, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Vickie,
>>
>> (Bringing this back on-list).
>>
>> On 5/15/12 10:21 AM, Vickie Troy-McKoy wrote:
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:04:33 -0400 From:
ch...@chr
On Windows 32-bit JVMs are often limited to less than 1.3GB of heap due
to fragmentation of the 32-bit address space. Sometimes one cannot even
get 1GB of heap!
For any hefty server process on Windows you really want a 64-bit JVM for
this reason.
On other OS's one can often allocate much mo
> From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:miguel_3_gonza...@yahoo.es]
> Subject: Re: two instances of Tomcat in same machine
> there wasn't a limit of 32 bits OS for running JVM for more than 1.5 Gb?
Yes, there is a limit on heap size for 32-bit JVMs and it's usually around 1.5
GB depending on the OS. T
Miguel Gonzalez wrote:
there wasn't a limit of 32 bits OS for running JVM for more than 1.5 Gb?
Not exactly. I'm not sure that my knowledge is totally accurate here, but here is my take
on it :
- a "32 bit OS" generally means that the total address space available to *a process*
running at
> From: Christian Kaufhold [mailto:kaufhol...@googlemail.com]
> Subject: tomcat slowing down
> What can we do to analyse the problem?
Start by taking a thread dump to find out what's going on inside the JVM.
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/HowTo#How_do_I_obtain_a_thread_dump_of_my_running_webapp_
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> we have the problem that tomact is slowing down after a while
> until even the manager app becomes unusable.
>
> Our System:
> 2 Quadcores/24 GB Mem
> OpenSuse 11.4
> tomcat 6.0.29
> wicket/hibernate/postgres
>
> Max Memory and total Memory 2GB
> Free Mom
On 16.05.2012 14:49, Christian Kaufhold wrote:
What can we do to analyse the problem?
Make a thread dump (kill -3 ). Information usually will be
written to catalina.out.
You can use jvisualvm tool to capture threads, memory snapshots, etc.
--
Mikolaj Rydzewski
Hi,
we have the problem that tomact is slowing down after a while
until even the manager app becomes unusable.
Our System:
2 Quadcores/24 GB Mem
OpenSuse 11.4
tomcat 6.0.29
wicket/hibernate/postgres
Max Memory and total Memory 2GB
Free Momory 500 MB when the system is slow
top shows 100 CPU usag
Pool works nice, but
I get empty logs/pool.2012-04-06.log
No debug messages, no slow query's.
Configuration below
---
datasource.xml:
---
${catalina.home}/conf/logging.properties:
handler
there wasn't a limit of 32 bits OS for running JVM for more than 1.5 Gb?
Regards,
Miguel
De: André Warnier
Para: Tomcat Users List
Enviado: Miércoles 16 de Mayo de 2012 11:50
Asunto: Re: two instances of Tomcat in same machine
Miguel Gonzalez wrote:
> Just
Miguel Gonzalez wrote:
Just wondering. With a 64 bits OS, how much RAM can you handle in a JVMand therefore with each instance of Tomcat?
For a 12 Gb of RAM machine, it would be wise if you want to have this kind of
setup (Apache and two Tomcat instances in the same machine) if you need more
Just wondering. With a 64 bits OS, how much RAM can you handle in a JVMand
therefore with each instance of Tomcat?
For a 12 Gb of RAM machine, it would be wise if you want to have this kind of
setup (Apache and two Tomcat instances in the same machine) if you need more
than 400-500 concurrent
On 16/05/2012 10:10, Miguel Gonzalez wrote:
>
>
>
> Well, I thought It was somehow related, trying to make sense of having two
> instances of Tomcat in the same machine and when this kind of setup is
> applicable (like the one I'm suggesting).
Not really, no.
p
> __
Well, I thought It was somehow related, trying to make sense of having two
instances of Tomcat in the same machine and when this kind of setup is
applicable (like the one I'm suggesting).
Miguel
De: Pid
Para: Tomcat Users List
Enviado: Miércoles 16 de Ma
On 15/05/2012 23:32, Miguel González Castaños wrote:
> On 15/05/2012 17:22, André Warnier wrote:
>> Vickie Troy-McKoy wrote:
>> ...
>>>
>>> Thank you Andre for your help. After I configured it as you
>>> specified, the behavior was the same as before I inquired on this forum.
>>
>> Well, it doesn
50 matches
Mail list logo
