Apache connectors for tomcat

Hi, Which is the recommended connector for Apache now? mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp (with balancer) ? rahul -- 1. e4 _ - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe,

Re: Apache connectors for tomcat

personal preference in this order mod_proxy_http, mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp rahul wrote: Hi, Which is the recommended connector for Apache now? mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp (with balancer) ? rahul -- 1. e4 _

RE: Apache connectors for tomcat

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:25 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Apache connectors for tomcat Hi, Which is the recommended connector for Apache now? mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp (with balancer

RE: Apache connectors for tomcat

with which we created them. - Albert Einstein -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:25 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Apache connectors for tomcat Hi, Which is the recommended connector for Apache now? mod_jk

Re: Apache connectors for tomcat

Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Filip, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: personal preference in this order mod_proxy_http, mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp I'm interested: why choose mod_proxy_http over mod_jk? ease of configuration, no API nor

RE: Apache connectors for tomcat

Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:56 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster for me. -Tony --- Christopher Schultz [EMAIL

Re: Apache connectors for tomcat

To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster for me. -Tony - To start a new topic, e-mail: users

RE: Apache connectors for tomcat

From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Apache connectors for tomcat Not sure about the interface/protocol being depricated It's mod_jk2 that has been abandoned for over two years; mod_jk is still in very active development. Any documentation or recommendations

RE: Apache connectors for tomcat

Thanks for the clarification. -Tony --- Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Apache connectors for tomcat Not sure about the interface/protocol being depricated It's mod_jk2 that has been abandoned for over two

RE: Apache connectors for tomcat

Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:25 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Apache connectors for tomcat Hi, Which is the recommended connector for Apache now? mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp (with balancer

Re: Apache connectors for tomcat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Filip, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: personal preference in this order mod_proxy_http, mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp I'm interested: why choose mod_proxy_http over mod_jk? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

Re: Apache connectors for tomcat

I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster for me. -Tony --- Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Filip, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: personal preference in this

RE: Apache connectors for tomcat

-Original Message- From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:56 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster

Re: Apache connectors for tomcat

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:56 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster for me. -Tony

Re: Apache connectors for tomcat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, Tony Anecito wrote: I heard that mod_jk was based off of ajp so I was quite surprised mod_jk was faster. Yes, mod_jk does use the AJP protocol. Why were you surprised that it was faster? With what are you comparing it? - -chris -BEGIN

Re: Apache connectors for tomcat

Hi Chris: 1. I am instrumenting inside the servlet code, looking at Apache web server logs then at the Rich Internet Application (RIA) For a typcial request for my Portal from client to servlet for example: 1. 4.55msec inside the RIA java code after the data was read from the SOAP message. 2.