Prabu,
Please don't hijack threads. Start a new thread instead of replying to
an old message. Your question will get better visibility that way.
Keep reading.
On 1/11/23 10:19, Ganesan, Prabu wrote:
Our Production Server Was Down, We have not Done any changes on this tomcat
Level
But we
lore **
Contact: +91 8526554535
Email: prabhu.c.gane...@capgemini.com
Out of curiosity looked at the loggings.
What does LunaNamedSystemMutex open() failed (for Luna Cloud?) mean ?
~Z
*From:*Hiran CHAUDHURI
*Sent:* 11 January 2023 21:36
*To:* Tomcat Users List
*Subject:* RE: tomcat is not co
----
> From: Simon Matter
> Sent: 12 January 2023 16:24
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: tomcat is not coming Up
>
> ***This mail has been sent by an external source***
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>>
>> This is
mail unless absolutely
necessary.
Capgemini encourages environmental awareness.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Matter
Sent: 12 January 2023 16:24
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat is not coming Up
***This mail has been sent by an external source***
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
id:image007.gif@01D926A1.46D89710]<http://www.slideshare.net/capgemini>[cid:image008.gif@01D926A1.46D89710]<http://www.youtube.com/capgeminimedia>
>
> Please consider the environment and do not print this email unless
> absolutely necessary.
> Capgemini encourages environ
450]<http://www.slideshare.net/capgemini>[cid:image008.gif@01D926A1.6427A450]<http://www.youtube.com/capgeminimedia>
Please consider the environment and do not print this email unless absolutely
necessary.
Capgemini encourages environmental awareness.
From: Hiran CHAUDHURI
Sent: 11 January 2
/www.slideshare.net/capgemini>[cid:image008.gif@01D926A1.46D89710]<http://www.youtube.com/capgeminimedia>
Please consider the environment and do not print this email unless absolutely
necessary.
Capgemini encourages environmental awareness.
From: Hiran CHAUDHURI
Sent: 11 January 2
CONFIDENTIAL & RESTRICTED
If on the old command line the apr libs were referenced but on the new one it
is not, I believe that could make the process not find the libraries to
communicate.
Enough of a reason to terminate with an error, but maybe it is on stderr and
nowhere in the logs.
*
Hi
> Hi team
>
> Our Production Servers are down, Not Coming up When we are trying to start
> the services
>
> In logs we couldn't see Any Errors only I can see Info.
>
>
> Though I can see some changes in this. But we have not made any changes
>
>
>
>
> Old : INFO [main]
Hello Prabu,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023, 8:56 PM Ganesan, Prabu
wrote:
> Hi team
>
>
>
> Our Production Servers are down, Not Coming up When we are trying to start
> the services
>
Which OS are you using? Please provide some basic details ( like OS, Tomcat
version, JRE version ) about your
Check your server.xml file
APR related commented config seems changed.
On Wed, 11 Jan, 2023, 20:51 Ganesan, Prabu,
wrote:
> Hi Team
>
> Need Emergency Help,
>
>
>
> Our Production Server Was Down, We have not Done any changes on this
> tomcat Level
>
> But we are seeing this Message.
>
>
>
>
James,
On 4/15/22 14:24, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
On 4/15/22 10:37 AM, Christopher Schultz (of the Tomcat Users' List) wrote:
. . .
Try specifying the "address" attribute of along with the
port. Give it a concrete IP address instead of "localhost" and see if
that improves things.
. . .
In response to my question about what could cause a system to disregard
its own host table,
On 4/15/22 11:31 AM, Jack Woehr (of the Midrange List) wrote:
Which order the search happens, DNS or hosts table first, is an option in
IBM i TCP configuration. CFGTCP option 12.
Fascinating. I can't
On 4/15/22 10:37 AM, Christopher Schultz (of the Tomcat Users' List) wrote:
. . .
Try specifying the "address" attribute of along with the port.
Give it a concrete IP address instead of "localhost" and see if that
improves things.
. . .
My Dear Mr. Schultz:
That did it!
Not knowing whether
On 4/15/22 10:37 AM, Christopher Schultz (on the Tomcat Users' List) wrote:
. . .
if "localhost" doesn't resolve to 127.0.0.1 on your system, you
may get this error. Can you quickly check it's not a DNS resolution
failure?
THIS is interesting.
If I look at the host table entries, I see
James,
On 4/15/22 12:24, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
This morning, I arrived at work to find that a customer was complaining
about their Tomcat server (running on an IBM Midrange box).
It had locked up last night, while being shut down, and now, if you try
to start it, it fails with
On 4/15/22 9:54 AM, Jim Oberholtzer wrote:
On a modern system if you're contemplating stopping/starting TCP you might
just as well IPL. Seems like using a nuke when a 100# bomb might work
though.
Looking at the QSYSOPR messages, I see that the system was taken down to
restricted condition at
On 4/15/22 9:39 AM, Jack Woehr wrote:
Not sure about the particular pathology in this instance, but it's the Java
runtime itself telling you something already has hold of the socket, and
it's not lying.
But it could be deluded into *thinking* something already has hold of
the socket.
On 4/15/22 9:24 AM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
This morning, I arrived at work to find that a customer was complaining
about their Tomcat server (running on an IBM Midrange box).
It had locked up last night, while being shut down, and now, if you try
to start it, it fails . . .
I tried
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:20 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/12/2016 15:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > John,
> >
> > On 12/7/16 7:19 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:58 AM Mark Thomas
> >> wrote:
> >
> >>> On 06/12/2016 02:59, John D.
On 07/12/2016 15:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> John,
>
> On 12/7/16 7:19 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:58 AM Mark Thomas
>> wrote:
>
>>> On 06/12/2016 02:59, John D. Ament wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
So I was able to identify my issue. It's not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John,
On 12/7/16 7:19 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:58 AM Mark Thomas
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/12/2016 02:59, John D. Ament wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> So I was able to identify my issue. It's not specifically a
>>>
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:58 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/12/2016 02:59, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>
>
> > So I was able to identify my issue. It's not specifically a tomcat
> > problem, but tomcat's bootstrapping makes it unique.
> >
> > one of the issues I've observed is that
On 06/12/2016 02:59, John D. Ament wrote:
> So I was able to identify my issue. It's not specifically a tomcat
> problem, but tomcat's bootstrapping makes it unique.
>
> one of the issues I've observed is that Tomcat's use of multithreading
> causes some thread deadlocking with some
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:28 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/12/2016 17:39, John D. Ament wrote:
> > Sorry missed a response..
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 12:36 PM John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 PM Christopher Schultz <
>
On 03/12/2016 17:39, John D. Ament wrote:
> Sorry missed a response..
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 12:36 PM John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 PM Christopher Schultz <
>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>>
> John,
>
> On 11/26/16 7:29 PM, John
Sorry missed a response..
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 12:36 PM John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 PM Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> John,
>
> On 11/26/16 7:29 PM, John D.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> John,
>
> On 11/26/16 7:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looking for some external input. I've put together a simple
> > tomcat embedded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John,
On 11/26/16 7:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking for some external input. I've put together a simple
> tomcat embedded instance designed to deploy an arbitrary set of
> servlets, filters, etc.
>
> For some reason, when I run
29 matches
Mail list logo