Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up
http://tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/03/24/myth-or-truth-one-should-always-use-apache-httpd-front-apache-tomcat-improve-perform
because I don't know if the author (a certain mthomas) will mention
it here.
2010/3/27 André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com:
http://tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/03/24/myth-or-truth-one-should-always-use-apache-httpd-front-apache-tomcat-improve-perform
Might this not also be worth preserving in the Tomcat FAQ/wiki ?
There is
Thanks for the link.
au
http://www.xprad.org/
Hassan Schroeder-2 wrote:
Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up
http://tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/03/24/myth-or-truth-one-should-always-use-apache-httpd-front-apache-tomcat-improve-perform
because I don't know
Very entertaining reading! Thanks Chris and Mark for re-benchmarking,
explaining, and giving your opinions on the results. I'm not entirely sure
how I missed Chris' benchmark results email, almost exactly one year ago
now. Chris: there are no units on your results numbers, and I'm not seeing
Hi ,
We have a online shop developed as a suite of JSR168 portlets. On some
portlets we list products and images (so there are about 25 images per
page + other images).
One image has around 250k.
Performance was greatly improved after we put apache httpd in front
(images served by apache
On 25/03/2010 01:39, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Chris deserves a lot of the credit. Without his figures, it is just opinion.
That's the second benchmark that I see today that has odd numbers.
What did you think was odd?
Mark
On 25/03/2010 07:01, Jason Brittain wrote:
Very entertaining reading! Thanks Chris and Mark for re-benchmarking,
explaining, and giving your opinions on the results. I'm not entirely sure
how I missed Chris' benchmark results email, almost exactly one year ago
now. Chris: there are no units
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 3/24/2010 8:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/03/2010 00:26, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up
On 25/03/2010 17:47, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 3/24/2010 8:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/03/2010 00:26, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason,
On 3/25/2010 3:01 AM, Jason Brittain wrote:
Chris: there are no units on your results numbers, and I'm not seeing
any procedure you used, nor any configurations you used, so I'm not sure how
to interpret the numbers.
I'd be happy to give
On 25/03/2010 00:26, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up
http://tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/03/24/myth-or-truth-one-should-always-use-apache-httpd-front-apache-tomcat-improve-perform
because I don't know if the author (a certain mthomas)
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Chris deserves a lot of the credit. Without his figures, it is just opinion.
That's the second benchmark that I see today that has odd numbers.
Rémy
-
To
On 10.10.2009 16:45, darinpope wrote:
I'm having the same issue as documented in:
http://www.nabble.com/httpd-JK-Tomcat-hung-connections-td10403182.html
For our situation, we haven't hit the server reached MaxClients setting
issue yet, but we easily could.
Use thread dumps to see, what
I believe (intuition, haven't checked) it is the latency the TCP adds
to the setup which messes up with the threads scheduler (i'll
ellaborate...)
When you are in Tomcat only, between the http header coming in (IO)
and you sending a response (again IO) you can usually get away with a
Yuval Perlov wrote:
Out tomcat servers are handling around 30K SSL hits every 5 minutes with
very little effort (10% cpu average on a dual core machine, good
response time).
We tried to put in httpd in front thinking we can squeeze out better
performance and memory consumption.
The system just
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:27:09AM -0400, Larry Prikockis wrote:
I know the latest edition of the O'Reilly Tomcat book by Brittain and
Darwin strongly advocates the use of standalone Tomcat as opposed to the
traditional httpd-Tomcat approach, but this seems to be somewhat of a
paradigm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry,
Other than Mark's comments...
Larry Prikockis wrote:
| 1) Any thoughts on why the Apache SSL - Tomcat combination should be so
| much slower?
If your transactions are short, it's certainly possible that most of the
time is taken up by
Out tomcat servers are handling around 30K SSL hits every 5 minutes
with very little effort (10% cpu average on a dual core machine, good
response time).
We tried to put in httpd in front thinking we can squeeze out better
performance and memory consumption.
The system just couldn't handle
Mark H. Wood wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:27:09AM -0400, Larry Prikockis wrote:
Specifically, we have a webapp on a Windows 2003 server that utilizes
Apache 2.2 SSL as a frontend and mod_proxy_ajp to send requests to Tomcat
5.5.17 (on the same server). By eliminating the Apache frontend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry,
Larry Prikockis wrote:
| Mark H. Wood wrote:
| That's certainly worth thinking about. What exactly do you mean by
| performance?
|
| good point... shoulda been more specific-- we were mainly looking at raw
| connections per second and
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry,
Other than Mark's comments...
Larry Prikockis wrote:
| 1) Any thoughts on why the Apache SSL - Tomcat combination should be so
| much slower?
If your transactions are short, it's certainly possible that most of
Please update mod_jk. 1.2.6 is *very* outdated. We are now at 1.2.22 and
a lot of things have improved.
After upgrading, check your configuration against the reference guide in
the docs, especially the pages for the worker properties and Apache
directives. You might want to add some more
Rainer,
Thanks for the reply! You're certainly right on the JK version.
Can you be more specific on the add some more timeouts comment? Do
you mean a higher number on connection_pool_timeout?
Also, should the relationship between httpd's MaxClients and the
connector's maxThreads be 1:1 or
Brantley Hobbs wrote:
Rainer,
Thanks for the reply! You're certainly right on the JK version.
Can you be more specific on the add some more timeouts comment? Do
you mean a higher number on connection_pool_timeout?
Have a look at connect_timeout and prepost_timeout. Usually I also use
Rainer,
Thanks for all the info. Hopefully we can get this thing whipped into
shape.
Brantley
Rainer Jung wrote:
Brantley Hobbs wrote:
Rainer,
Thanks for the reply! You're certainly right on the JK version.
Can you be more specific on the add some more timeouts comment? Do
you mean a
-ajp.conf
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/07 Wed PM 10:36:09 EDT
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: HTTPD with Tomcat
Filip,
Do you happen to have any examples of your mod_proxy setup? I've been
trying to get mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp working (apache
?
Thanks,
Brad Mann
Software Engineer - Information Access Services
HARRIS Corporation / GCSD
(321) 984-6292
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Wednesday, June 07, 2006 4:45 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: HTTPD
- Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Wednesday, June 07, 2006 4:45 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: HTTPD with Tomcat
you can also make your own life very easy, by switching to mod_proxy,
and voila, everything works :)
Filip
Mann, Bradley wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to setup
This appears to be working. Much appreciated!
Cheers,
-- Steven
Warren Pace wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/08 Thu PM 06:41:54 EDT
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: HTTPD with Tomcat
Aye, Marc, I saw that. I'm not using proxy_balance, and the server.xml
you can also make your own life very easy, by switching to mod_proxy,
and voila, everything works :)
Filip
Mann, Bradley wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to setup a scenario in which Tomcat is hosting a web
application behind HTTPD using the Jakarta Connector. I have installed
the following on
Corporation / GCSD
(321) 984-6292
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 4:45 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: HTTPD with Tomcat
you can also make your own life very easy, by switching to mod_proxy,
and voila, everything
- Information Access Services
HARRIS Corporation / GCSD
(321) 984-6292
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Wednesday, June 07, 2006 4:45 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: HTTPD with Tomcat
you can also make your own life very easy, by switching
PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: HTTPD with Tomcat
you can also make your own life very easy, by switching to mod_proxy,
and voila, everything works :)
Filip
Mann, Bradley wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to setup a scenario in which Tomcat is hosting a web
application behind HTTPD
The auto-config Listener has always been somewhat problematic, especially
with TC 4.x. At the very least, you need to include in httpd.conf:
Include /path/to/catalina/home/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf
I don't believe that the Listener really does all that much under the
Server tag. Even in TC
34 matches
Mail list logo
