Hi
I undid the changes i had done in server.xml and that seems to fix the
issue.
could you help me understand what could be happening ?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2012/5/14 rohit patil :
> > Thanks for replying,
> >
> > 1. I do not have any filters confi
2012/5/14 rohit patil :
> Thanks for replying,
>
> 1. I do not have any filters configured.
> 2. Yes my web.xml does mark themselves as adhering to the Sevlet 3.0
> specification
> 3. Yes apps under http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/ also does NOT work,
> they also throw up the same exception.
>
>
Thanks for replying,
1. I do not have any filters configured.
2. Yes my web.xml does mark themselves as adhering to the Sevlet 3.0
specification
3. Yes apps under http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/ also does NOT work,
they also throw up the same exception.
Here is the stack trace
java.lang.Ille
2012/5/14 rohit patil :
> Hi All,
> I have written the below piece of code (NewServlet.java) to try the Servlet
> 3.0 async feature.
> But it is failing by throwing up the below mentioned error.
>
> Tomcat Version: 7.0.27 (32 bit)
> OS: Windows 7
>
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Not supported.
Hi Chris,
>
> It seems dangerous to allow the client to specify the file name. All
> kinds of bad things can happen such as specifying special file names
> (does "PRN" still work in win32? through Java?) or overwriting files
> from other clients.
>
> I would highly recommend that some portion of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ole,
On 9/3/2011 8:05 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
> Anyone know if the the keys for the various
> javax.servlet.http.Part headers are available as constants
> anywhere? I'd like to do something like:
>
> part.getHeader(Part.FILENAME);...instead of
> part.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 9/3/2011 11:51 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
> What I usually do to get the filename is:
>
> Part uploadPart = request.getPart("uploadfield"); // get the Part
> String contDispoHeader =
> uploadPart.getHeader("Content-Disposition"); /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ole,
On 9/6/2011 11:03 AM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
> Described in this article:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-aj-dwr/?ca=dgr-lnxw06AjaxDWR
>
> I could just go back to commons file upload, but thought I'd look
> around to see if anythin
Thanks guys!
Ole
On 09/03/2011 10:51 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Soons [mailto:jso...@juilliard.edu]
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 2:24 PM
To: Ole Ersoy; Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Servlet 3.0 File Upload
You need to add a line in in
Hi Andre,
I'm looking for something like this:
pfu.setProgressListener(new FileUploadProgressListener());
Described in this article:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-aj-dwr/?ca=dgr-lnxw06AjaxDWR
I could just go back to commons file upload, but thought I'd look around to see
if
Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know whether it's possible to monitor progress of a file upload?
What do you mean by "monitoring" ?
Is it a question of providing the user with some feedback, like a progress bar ?
If so, then one of the easier ways would be to write your own java applet, download
Thank you for the advice. I'll stick to hard coded file locations and names :).
Thanks again,
- Ole
On 09/05/2011 03:22 AM, André Warnier wrote:
This must be about the worst advice I have ever seen.
What about someone typing e.g. "/etc/passwd" in that text box?
If you allow people to upload f
Thank you for the advice. I'll stick to hard coded file locations and names :).
Thanks again,
- Ole
On 09/05/2011 03:22 AM, André Warnier wrote:
This must be about the worst advice I have ever seen.
What about someone typing e.g. "/etc/passwd" in that text box?
If you allow people to upload f
This must be about the worst advice I have ever seen.
What about someone typing e.g. "/etc/passwd" in that text box?
If you allow people to upload files to your server, you should create your own location
and naming scheme for the uploaded files. You should not even use the original filename,
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: cjder...@gmail.com [mailto:cjder...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of chris
> derham
> Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 6:51 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Servlet 3.0 File Upload
>
>
> Letting the remote user control t
> > You need to add a line in in your form:
> >
> >
> > Then in your servlet GetPost() method you put this filename in a
> > variable:
> > String filename;
> > filename = req.getParameter("filename");
> >
> > Then instead of part.write("samplefile");
> > do:
> > part.write(filename);
>
Letting th
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Soons [mailto:jso...@juilliard.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 2:24 PM
> To: Ole Ersoy; Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Servlet 3.0 File Upload
>
> You need to add a line in in your form:
>
>
> Then in
You need to add a line in in your form:
Then in your servlet GetPost() method you put this filename in a variable:
String filename;
filename = req.getParameter("filename");
Then instead of part.write("samplefile");
do:
part.write(filename);
Jonathan Soons
___
Never mind...I see the example hard codes the name of the file. Sorry for the
noise.
On 09/02/2011 05:50 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I have a working file upload servlet, with the exception that it calls
the uploaded file "samplefile" instead of using the name of the file. So
if I upload differe
Konstantin,
I may have to give the debugger a try - thanks for the info.
Matt
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> > org.apache.tomcat.util.bcel.classfile.ClassFormatException:
> > Invalid byte tag in constant pool: 60
>
> The above message is created by
> o.a.tomcat.uti
> org.apache.tomcat.util.bcel.classfile.ClassFormatException:
> Invalid byte tag in constant pool: 60
The above message is created by
o.a.tomcat.util.bcel.classfile.Constant#readConstant(...). There is a
switch() and default: label results in this exception being thrown.
Expected values there are
On 20/07/2011 21:37, Matthew Tyson wrote:
> java -version:
>
> java version "1.6.0_26"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode)
>
> We just upgraded it from 1.6.0_22 to see if it would address this problem
> (it didn't).
Are
java -version:
java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode)
We just upgraded it from 1.6.0_22 to see if it would address this problem
(it didn't).
> 1. Are you using Tomcat downloaded from tomcat.apache.org?
2011/7/20 Matthew Tyson :
> Adding that to the skip list definitely prevented that error, but I'm
> getting many jars with the same problem. I thought I could maybe get away
> with just skipping them all, but I'm starting to see some jars that have
> taglibs in them (and so need to be scanned).
>
Adding that to the skip list definitely prevented that error, but I'm
getting many jars with the same problem. I thought I could maybe get away
with just skipping them all, but I'm starting to see some jars that have
taglibs in them (and so need to be scanned).
All these jars are giving the same
On 20/07/2011 03:55, Matthew Tyson wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> tomcat 7.0.19
> Java 1.6.0_22
> CentOS 5.6
>
> I just switched the web.xml to servlet 3.0 (from a app running servlet 2.4
> previously without issue) and now I'm seeing the following error (turned on
> fine logging in the util class):
> FI
Michael McCutcheon wrote:
>Does Tomcat 7.0.8 support the Servlet 3.0 security annotations?
>
>@RolesAllowed
>@DeclareRoles
>@ServletSecurity
>
>, etc.?
Yes. Tomcat 7.0.x fully supports the Servlet 3.0 spec. Every release has passed
the TCK.
Mark
Thanks everyone,
Just wish there was an "Ordered" interface, or annotation, or
attribute of @WebXXX annotations to which ordering can be applied, so
that web.xml is not needed for such IMO basic feature.
Regards,
Stevo.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2011/2/8 Christopher Schultz :
>> On 2/8/2011 4:31 AM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
>>> I don't see support for
>>> ordering in @WebFilter annotation. Am I missing something?
>>
>> I don't see anything that would allow an ordering to be specified.
2011/2/8 Christopher Schultz :
> On 2/8/2011 4:31 AM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
>> I don't see support for
>> ordering in @WebFilter annotation. Am I missing something?
>
> I don't see anything that would allow an ordering to be specified.
>
Ordering is discussed in chapters 8.2.2 and 8.2.3 of the servl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stevo,
On 2/8/2011 4:31 AM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
> I don't see support for
> ordering in @WebFilter annotation. Am I missing something?
I don't see anything that would allow an ordering to be specified.
> But if [programmatically adding] is the only
On 08/02/2011 09:31, Stevo Slavić wrote:
> Hello Tomcat users,
>
> Now that Tomcat 7 is out with Servlet 3.0 support, I've been trying
> out new features it brings. In pre 3.0 servlet era, one would specify
> filter in web.xml and order they are defined in the xml would
> determine order filters w
Rex Wang wrote:
> hi, Dear Tomcat Developers,
> We adopt tomcat as an embeded servlet container in our system. Could you
> guys share with us any plan to implement the servlet 3.0 specification,
Look in the dev archives.
> or can I have a preview in current trunk(7.0) snapshot?
You'll need to b
33 matches
Mail list logo
