ProxyPass doesn't accept wildcards like this.
You can either Proxy a complete path, and 'unproxy' the ones you don't need:
ProxyPass /scripts/ ! # exclamation mark == 'not'
ProxyPass /images/ ! # exclamation mark == 'not'
ProxyPass /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raj,
Raj Mettai wrote:
how to put wildcards into ProxyPass, for example if I want to send
only jsp requests to tomcat and not html like below.
ProxyPass /*.jsp ajp://127.0.0.1:8009/
the above config is not working, I have jsp files spread
Hi,
how to put wildcards into ProxyPass, for example if I want to send only jsp
requests to tomcat and not html like below.
ProxyPass /*.jsp ajp://127.0.0.1:8009/
the above config is not working, I have jsp files spread across multiple
folders on tomcat and the same folder structure on
@tomcat.apache.org
Asunto: RE: mod_jk replacement?
I just tried it with the mod_proxy and mod_proxy_http modules which are
indeed available for Apache 2.0.59, and it works fine connecting to backend
Tomcat web service using the http protocol and port 8080.
I only needed one line in Apache's
the
tomcat's load in 90%.
-Mensaje original-
De: JNeuhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: jueves, 25 de enero de 2007 14:38
Para: users@tomcat.apache.org
Asunto: RE: mod_jk replacement?
I just tried it with the mod_proxy and mod_proxy_http modules which are
indeed available
JNeuhoff wrote:
The same here. Most of the static content (such as *.png) is being served by
the Apache frontend, and only requests for to our web service are configured
with the ProxPass directives. I had to use the ProxyPassReverse, too:
ProxyPreserveHost On
ProxyPass /ohpr/
Users List
Asunto: Re: mod_jk replacement?
On 1/22/07, David Rodríguez Fernández [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache.
The OP asked about Apache httpd 2.0.x, for which mod_proxy_ajp is not
available (introduced in 2.2.x).
And yes
I have repeated the rapid click test after I updated the
connectionTimeout=60, still getting the -53 and also -54 errors. This
time I have set log levels to debug. I'll send you a separate e-mail where
you can download them when you are back on Friday. Again thank you for your
help so far.
Para: Tomcat Users List
Asunto: Re: mod_jk replacement?
On 1/22/07, David Rodríguez Fernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache.
The OP asked about Apache httpd 2.0.x, for which mod_proxy_ajp is not
available (introduced in 2.2.x
Whenever you have connection pool setup
in mod_jk it means you don't have constant connections
any more. The connection pool will maintain the
connections and close them by some rule (size).
Now, having that you *must* have connectionTimeout=6
in server.xml for the AJP connector so
JNeuhoff wrote:
The web service still receives requests and responds
normally, yet mod_jk now always comes up with this in its mod_jk.log:
Increase the connection pool from 10 to 50 and see what happens.
Regards,
Mladen.
-
OK, one small error or typo in communication:
connection timeout on mod_jk side is in seconds, on tomcat side is in
milliseconds. So Mladens suggestion had a missing trailing 0 to make the
params on the two sides fit. I think he meant connectionTimeout=60
to make it fit the 600 on the mod_jk
connection timeout on mod_jk side is in seconds, on tomcat side is in
milliseconds. So Mladens suggestion had a missing trailing 0 to make the
params on the two sides fit. I think he meant connectionTimeout=60
to make it fit the 600 on the mod_jk side.
Thanks, you are right, there was a
JNeuhoff schrieb:
connection timeout on mod_jk side is in seconds, on tomcat side is in
milliseconds. So Mladens suggestion had a missing trailing 0 to make the
params on the two sides fit. I think he meant connectionTimeout=60
to make it fit the 600 on the mod_jk side.
Thanks, you are
Do I remember correctly, that Apache and Tomcat are on the same machine?
Is there a firewall on this machine?
They are both on the same machine. Apache is listening to a dedicated
IP-address, on port 80, while Tomcat is configured to using localhost, and
listens to port 8080 (http) and 8009
Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache.
I don't have this in an production environment, but along this week I plan
to do it.
This is an extract of my apache config:
ProxyPass /app/img/ !
ProxyPass /app/js/ !
ProxyPass /app/doc/ !
ProxyPass /app/css/ !
On 1/22/07, David Rodríguez Fernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache.
The OP asked about Apache httpd 2.0.x, for which mod_proxy_ajp is
not available (introduced in 2.2.x).
And yes, I've used it successfully in production on Linux
Hmm, this might be a good reason to upgrade to Apache 2.2.x then. Currently,
the mod_jk 1.2.20 in conjunction with Apache 2.0.59 is not suitable for a
production system running Windows 2003, and unfortunately we don't have
sysadmins for Linux or Unix, hence I am stuck with Windows 2003 as the
JNeuhoff wrote:
Is there another connector software available ...
http://www.nabble.com/Apache-mod_jk-memory-leak--tf3023318.html
There are two major things why you can observe so called
'leak'.
When connecting Apache Httpd and Tomcat via mod_jk the major
thing you have to take into account
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
J,
JNeuhoff wrote:
Hmm, this might be a good reason to upgrade to Apache 2.2.x then. Currently,
the mod_jk 1.2.20 in conjunction with Apache 2.0.59 is not suitable for a
production system running Windows 2003, and unfortunately we don't have
Thank for your explanations.
I've read all your posts to this thread and
Apache-mod_jk-memory-leak, and you didn't post the
server.xml config for AJP/1.3 connector, neither the
essential httpd.conf directives.
Here are connection-related directives from the the httpd.conf we have been
using
JNeuhoff wrote:
Thank for your explanations.
If any part closes this (AJP) connection you will observe
'memory leaak', meaning thread will stay open without the
clue the other part closed the connection.
Maybe I mis-understood the meaning of the timeout settings because I always
thought
On 1/21/07, JNeuhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't help on the Windows/mod_jk issue because I haven't
used either for quite some time but...
Alternatively, we are thinking of running a standalone Tomcat in which case
we'd find to find a way of mapping some web-enabled directories with static
23 matches
Mail list logo
