Hello,
We have a setup in AWS with an ALB sitting in front of 2 Tomcat servers hosting
our application. We are having sporadic issues where the ALB will reject some
calls with a "502" error. The system will be fine for days or weeks, and then
suddenly for a few hours there will be several
problems, or
are you just asking if everything looks reasonable?
- -chris
> -- Messaggio originale -- Da: "Christopher Schultz"
> <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>> A: users@tomcat.apache.org
> <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org> Inviato: 27/12/2019 16:29:28
ice and share
>>>> resources as per priority level setting of OS.
>
> I disagree. There are use-cases for running multiple Tomcat
> instances on the same machine.
>
>>>> If you don't have heavy user activity expectations then
>>>> this e
A: users@tomcat.apache.org
Inviato: 27/12/2019 16:29:28
Oggetto: Re: How to set apache load balancer for send request to 6
tomcat server
Firma ha problemi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA256/>Giancarlo,On 12/23/19 12:45, Giancarlo Celli wrote:/> Hi, I need to configure
; > If you don't have heavy user activity expectations then this
> > excercise is pointless.
>
> ?
>
> - -chris
>
> > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 17:45 Giancarlo Celli,
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, I need to configure a load balancer with apache connector on
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Giancarlo,
On 12/23/19 12:45, Giancarlo Celli wrote:
> Hi, I need to configure a load balancer with apache connector on a
> jelastic server that redirects requests to 6 server workers with
> tomcat 7 installed. Atteched you can find ext
e are use-cases for running multiple Tomcat instances
on the same machine.
> If you don't have heavy user activity expectations then this
> excercise is pointless.
?
- -chris
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 17:45 Giancarlo Celli,
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I need to configure a load balanc
ancarlo.ce...@flottaweb.com>
> Inviato: 23/12/2019 23:56:41
> Oggetto: Re: How to set apache load balancer for send request to 6 tomcat
> server
>
> If you wish we can work the problem , piece by piece through logical
> construction of the solution.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec
"
>> A: "Tomcat Users List" ; "Giancarlo Celli" <
>> giancarlo.ce...@flottaweb.com>
>> Inviato: 23/12/2019 23:56:41
>> Oggetto: Re: How to set apache load balancer for send request to 6 tomcat
>> server
>>
>> If you wi
est regards.
> Giancarlo
>
>
> -- Messaggio originale --
> Da: "Zahid Rahman"
> A: "Tomcat Users List" ; "Giancarlo Celli" <
> giancarlo.ce...@flottaweb.com>
> Inviato: 23/12/2019 23:56:41
> Oggetto: Re: How to set apache load balance
the files with the extracts of the configurations
Thanks.
Best regards.
Giancarlo
-- Messaggio originale --
Da: "Zahid Rahman"
A: "Tomcat Users List" ; "Giancarlo Celli"
Inviato: 23/12/2019 23:56:41
Oggetto: Re: How to set apache load balancer for send request
If you wish we can work the problem , piece by piece through logical
construction of the solution.
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 17:45 Giancarlo Celli,
wrote:
> Hi,
> I need to configure a load balancer with apache connector on a jelastic
> server that redirects requests to 6 serve
I need to configure a load balancer with apache connector on a jelastic
> server that redirects requests to 6 server workers with tomcat 7 installed.
> Atteched you can find extract from httpd.conf and workers.properties.
> I need to send single request to tomcat server individ
Your home page is in Italian
https://www.flottaweb.com/en/
While your login page is in English
https://www.flottaweb.com/en/login/
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 17:45 Giancarlo Celli,
wrote:
> Hi,
> I need to configure a load balancer with apache connector on a jelastic
> server that
Hi,
I need to configure a load balancer with apache connector on a jelastic
server that redirects requests to 6 server workers with tomcat 7
installed.
Atteched you can find extract from httpd.conf and workers.properties.
I need to send single request to tomcat server individually, so I set
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: AW: https redirect failed for POST request when behind a load balancer
Bin,
So it is working as designed in the RFC...
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_HTTP-5F302=DwIGaQ=uilaK90D4TOVoH58
en after that all links, forms will be on https.
Best regards
Peter
> Our engineer who has access to the load balancer is off today, will get some
> log info on the load balancer side about the redirect.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Bin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kreu
Peter:
Here is what I got when using curl on a client.
curl -I http://lb-api:8080/urls?param1=something\=123
HTTP/1.0 302 Found
Location: https://lb-api:8443/ urls?param1=something\=123
Server: BigIP
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: 0
Our engineer who has access to the load balancer is off
Bin,
> Peter:
> To answer your questions
> 1. The response header when using 8080 to post, I got:
>
> Status Code: 405 Method Not Allowed
> Allow: POST
> Cache-Control: private
> Content-Language: en
> Content-Length: 1045
> Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
>
Peter:
To answer your questions
1. The response header when using 8080 to post, I got:
Status Code: 405 Method Not Allowed
Allow: POST
Cache-Control: private
Content-Language: en
Content-Length: 1045
Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:48:07
Bin,
> Peter:
> Our Load balancer uses a VIP to do the redirect, so when a request coming in
> as http://lb-api:8080, it changes it into https://lb-api:8443 and submit to
> the api server behind. I could not see any redirect logged into the access
> log. However, if I s
Peter:
Our Load balancer uses a VIP to do the redirect, so when a request coming in as
http://lb-api:8080, it changes it into https://lb-api:8443 and submit to the
api server behind. I could not see any redirect logged into the access log.
However, if I submit a request to the api server
Hi Bin
> Konstantin:
> Thank you very much for your reply. To answer your question
>
> 1. The api-lb and lb-api was a typo.
>
> 2. I was able to reproduce this problem with a single server behind the
> load balancer.
> Where http://lb-test-api:8080 was set
Konstantin:
Thank you very much for your reply. To answer your question
1. The api-lb and lb-api was a typo.
2. I was able to reproduce this problem with a single server behind the
load balancer.
Where http://lb-test-api:8080 was set to forward to https://lb-test-api:8443
using
ttp://my-api1:8080, it is automatically redirect to https://my-api1:8443
> The redirect works fine for all our REST services. However, when we setup a
> load balancer in front of the two servers, and setup the redirect as
> following: http://api-lb:8080 to https://lb-api:8443, our POST was r
for all our REST services. However, when we setup a load
balancer in front of the two servers, and setup the redirect as following:
http://api-lb:8080 to https://lb-api:8443, our POST was redirected as GET
causing the request to fail. Is there any setup we can do to force the POST not
being
based
>> REST APIs exposed for mobile devices. SSL is offloaded at load-balancer or
>> apache level.
>>
>> Can we still get access to client certificate at web app level?
>>
>> On second thought we can live without having access to client cert but can
>> we h
On 02.12.2016 13:27, Bipin Jethwani wrote:
We use Spring security and want to use Two Way SSL for a few Jersey based
REST APIs exposed for mobile devices. SSL is offloaded at load-balancer or
apache level.
Can we still get access to client certificate at web app level?
On second thought we can
...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: 02 December 2016 17:09
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Two Way SSL - SSL Offloading at load balancer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Bipin,
On 12/2/16 7:27 AM, Bipin Jethwani wrote:
> We use Spring security and want to use Two Way SSL for a few Jersey
> base
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Bipin,
On 12/2/16 7:27 AM, Bipin Jethwani wrote:
> We use Spring security and want to use Two Way SSL for a few Jersey
> based REST APIs exposed for mobile devices. SSL is offloaded at
> load-balancer or apache level.
>
> Can we s
On 02.12.2016 13:27, Bipin Jethwani wrote:
We use Spring security and want to use Two Way SSL for a few Jersey based
REST APIs exposed for mobile devices. SSL is offloaded at load-balancer or
apache level.
Can we still get access to client certificate at web app level?
On second thought we can
We use Spring security and want to use Two Way SSL for a few Jersey based
REST APIs exposed for mobile devices. SSL is offloaded at load-balancer or
apache level.
Can we still get access to client certificate at web app level?
On second thought we can live without having access to client cert
loud based project where I encounter Scale-in/ Scale
> out
> > of Tomcat instances.
> > We have Apache load balancer as well. The requirement is to dynamically
> add
> > any new Tomcat instances during scale out to Load balancer and remove
> > tomcat instances during sca
> Hi All,
>
> Good Morning.
>
> I am working in a Cloud based project where I encounter Scale-in/ Scale
out
> of Tomcat instances.
> We have Apache load balancer as well. The requirement is to dynamically
add
> any new Tomcat instances during scale out to Load bala
Hi All,
Good Morning.
I am working in a Cloud based project where I encounter Scale-in/ Scale out
of Tomcat instances.
We have Apache load balancer as well. The requirement is to dynamically add
any new Tomcat instances during scale out to Load balancer and remove
tomcat instances during scale
scripting updates for
load-balancer members and thought I'd ask here before slogging
through the code to see if there are any requirements I'm
missing.
Long story short, I'd like to script setting the activation
status for a particular load-balanced worker to something, like
ACT or DIS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
On 1/12/15 2:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I'm running into a bit of difficulty scripting updates for
load-balancer members and thought I'd ask here before slogging
through the code to see if there are any requirements I'm missing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
I'm running into a bit of difficulty scripting updates for
load-balancer members and thought I'd ask here before slogging through
the code to see if there are any requirements I'm missing.
Long story short, I'd like to script setting
Hi Chris,
Am 12.01.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
On 1/12/15 2:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I'm running into a bit of difficulty scripting updates for
load-balancer members and thought I'd ask here before slogging
through
The Java version wasn't it. Recompiled and redeployed with 1.7.0_25
and it had no effect.
The SSL handshake problem went away when we disabled TLS 1.1/1.2 in the
JCP on the client side and clicked Restore Security Prompts in the JCP.
There was also a problem with JSESSIONID not being sent to
2014-03-06 0:30 GMT+04:00 Bill Davidson bill...@gmail.com:
The Java version wasn't it. Recompiled and redeployed with 1.7.0_25
and it had no effect.
The SSL handshake problem went away when we disabled TLS 1.1/1.2 in the
JCP on the client side and clicked Restore Security Prompts in the JCP.
:
JSESSIONID=a big hex number, secure=false, httpOnly=false
So no, I don't think that's it. We're set to send on any protocol.
Moreover, shouldn't the applet be sending httpOnly cookies even
if they are not visible to Javascript?
1. Why would it act differently with the load balancer than with a
direct
2014-03-06 2:11 GMT+04:00 Bill Davidson bill...@gmail.com:
On 3/5/2014 12:52 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Session cookie is HttpOnly in Tomcat 7.
If you missed that in migration guide, it is here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/migration-7.html#Session_cookie_configuration
I added this to some code
On 3/5/2014 2:28 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
The HttpOnly flag is used by cookies sent by server to the client.
There is no point checking it on request.getCookies(), as browsers do
not send it back (neither do they send 'path', 'secure' etc.).
Isn't that showing what the server is sending
the server to the client?
2. Why did it work when going direct without the load balancer?
3. Why did it sometimes work with IE even with the load balancer?
4. Why did it still fail when I reverted to Tomcat 6?
5. Why did it work before this release when we had TLS 1.1/1.2 enabled
in the client JCP? Note
Isn't the applet supposed to send browser cookies regardless of if
Javascript can see them?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
We tried to upgrade a production server to Tomcat 7 yesterday and it
broke our printing applet that we use to control a printer in its native
printer language.
This seemed odd to us because it worked perfectly in testing. When we
go direct to our production servers (bypassing the Cisco load
production servers (bypassing the Cisco load balancer
which is doing SSL for us), it also works fine in production.
The only thing that's changed is using Tomcat 7.
We only have one connector in server.xml
Connector port=8009
protocol=AJP/1.3
address=127.0.0.1
language.
This seemed odd to us because it worked perfectly in testing.
When we go direct to our production servers (bypassing the Cisco
load balancer which is doing SSL for us), it also works fine in
production.
The only thing that's changed is using Tomcat 7.
We only have one connector
.
It's some sort of combination of the load balancer and Tomcat 7 not
getting along with each other, but there's nothing to indicate that
in catalina.out or mod_jk.log or error.log.
So you have client (applet) - Cisco LB - Tomcat? Or, are there other
components in the mix? Does Cisco LB speak
with Tomcat 6.0.37
The applet is bit-for-bit identical. It's built with Java 1.1
compatibility mode.
It's some sort of combination of the load balancer and Tomcat 7
not getting along with each other, but there's nothing to
indicate that in catalina.out or mod_jk.log or error.log.
So you
httpd and
bypassing the load balancer. We've been forced to open up direct
access to the ports for that so that our customers can print. We
don't like that because we lose the advantages of load balancing
and the SSL load is now on our web servers instead of the expensive
dedicated hardware that's
were
using IE but not others who may be using IE, Firefox or Chrome.
We've played with TLS/SSL settings in IE and Firefox. That can
change the error message but it still fails.
Again, it works fine when connecting directly to Apache httpd and
bypassing the load balancer. We've been
On 3/4/2014 1:24 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Well... then you'd need a balancer for each balancer ;)
Can you reproduce this issue yourself on your own computer (running
the applet locally)? If so, what version of Java is running?
That's mostly what I've been doing for the last 24 hours.
On 3/4/2014 1:36 PM, Bill Davidson wrote:
On 3/4/2014 1:24 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Well... then you'd need a balancer for each balancer ;)
Can you reproduce this issue yourself on your own computer (running
the applet locally)? If so, what version of Java is running?
That's mostly
On 3/4/2014 3:13 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
Hmm, is the applet signed, and is the certificate from a trusted authority?
Oracle recently made some changes to Java which tightened down applet security.
They also made some changes in the security policy that block communication on
well-known ports
that we use to control a printer in its native
printer language.
This seemed odd to us because it worked perfectly in testing. When we
go direct to our production servers (bypassing the Cisco load balancer
which is doing SSL for us), it also works fine in production.
The only thing that's
between two tomcat nodes behind load balancer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
Jeffrey,
On 7/22/13 10:00 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
-Original Message- From: vi...@thepenguin.org
[mailto:vi...@thepenguin.org] Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013
7:25 AM To: Tomcat Users
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:57 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] Enable session persistence between two tomcat nodes
behind load balancer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:57 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] Enable session persistence between two tomcat nodes
behind load balancer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:45 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re:[OT] Enable session persistence between two tomcat nodes
behind load balancer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 7/23/2013 5:51 PM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:45 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re:[OT] Enable session persistence between two tomcat nodes
behind load balancer
-BEGIN
-Original Message-
From: vi...@thepenguin.org [mailto:vi...@thepenguin.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 7:25 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Enable session persistence between two tomcat nodes behind
load balancer
Hello:
I have been searching for an answer to how to set
tomcat nodes behind load balancer
Hello:
I have been searching for an answer to how to set this up. I find
a lot of posts on session persistence but none seem to describe
how to set it up. Is there a simple explanation out there that
tells me how I go about setting up session persistence
Hello:
I have been searching for an answer to how to set this up. I find a lot of
posts on session persistence but none seem to describe how to set it up. Is
there a simple explanation out there that tells me how I go about setting up
session persistence (with Apache, I would just set up
is pretty simple, you just need to adjust the Manager / tag in
server.xml, and if using a relational database create the table.
I just want the tomcats to either a) direct all session traffic to a single
node
This sounds like you're referring to sticky sessions and that something your
load
of mod_jk are you using?
- are the workers named SERVER-(1-5) members of a load balancer worker?
- What is your test URL?
- is this URL mapped to the load balancer worker via JkMount or similar?
- is the worker SERVER-5 not in error state (check mod_jk logs and
jk-status)?
- did you make sure
Hello!
I am trying to use JK_ROUTE to forward all traffic to some worker which are
disabled.
Disabled workers does not allow new sessions, but I think if I set it
explicitly,
it should be used?
SetEnvIf Remote_Addr 10\.0\.0\.1 JK_ROUTE=SERVER-5
However, then 10.0.0.1 accesses LB applcation,
it
Hi
we have pretty often an offset on our Load Balancer Values and negative
number of backend connections (see jk-status screenshot). We just updated
mod_jk but the problems just come more frequent IMHO.
Might this (little bit older) statistics for worker catalog5 be helpful for
solving
This looks looks like a nice time to look at your existing traffic and get
actuals of
1) Hits per second
2) Bandwidth usage
Then use your access logs (or if you have a test suite - use that ...
guessing owning 8 weblogic instances probably means there was a budget to
own a test suite) to
On 31/05/2011 21:10, Tauqir Akhtar wrote:
Hi
We have been using Weblogic Clusters with Cisco ACE Load Balancer
We have 8 managed servers in the weblogic Cluster distributed evenly over two
Machines.
Load Balancer distributes the load in Robin Round fashion across these 8
managed servers
)
WebsLogicServer6 (Port : 6006)
WebsLogicServer7 (Port : 6007)
WebsLogicServer8 (Port : 6008)
Right now we are using WebLogic Servers in a Cluster that are loaded balanced
by Cisco Load Balancer.
In current scenario using WebLogic , if a user sends a request
From: Tauqir Akhtar [mailto:takh...@jny.com]
Subject: RE: Tomcat with Cisco ACE Load Balancer
All I am trying here to implement Tomcat in Load Balanced Environment.
Please if you can guide me .
Pid's words still stand:
Impossible to say, we don't know anything about your application
- Original Message -
From: Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2011 1:16 PM
Subject: RE: Tomcat with Cisco ACE Load Balancer
From: Tauqir Akhtar [mailto:takh...@jny.com]
Subject: RE: Tomcat
Hi
We have been using Weblogic Clusters with Cisco ACE Load Balancer
We have 8 managed servers in the weblogic Cluster distributed evenly over two
Machines.
Load Balancer distributes the load in Robin Round fashion across these 8
managed servers using the concept of Stickiness.
Now we need
bed with 3 tomcat with (Max thread 500 on each,Individual tomcat able
to accept 400 concurent in long run).
Now expecting Same through Load Balancer but getting error in long run
:java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
worker File Details::
worker 1,worker2 and worker 3 created
).
Now expecting Same through Load Balancer but getting error in long run
:java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
worker File Details::
worker 1,worker2 and worker 3 created .Sample below
worker.list=balancer
worker.list=worker3
worker.worker3.type=ajp13
worker.worker3.host
expecting Same through Load Balancer but getting error in long run
:java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
worker File Details::
worker 1,worker2 and worker 3 created .Sample below
worker.list=balancer
worker.list=worker3
worker.worker3.type=ajp13
worker.worker3.host=10.58.116.20
).
Now expecting Same through Load Balancer but getting error in long run
:java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
worker File Details::
worker 1,worker2 and worker 3 created .Sample below
worker.list=balancer
worker.list=worker3
worker.worker3.type=ajp13
worker.worker3.host
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 11/11/2010 14:12, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I'm looking for a modest load balancer to perform SSL termination and
work well with Tomcat's cookie- and URL-based sticky session mechanism.
Does anyone have any recommendations?
Decent H/W usually cost $$$
If Apache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I'm looking for a modest load balancer to perform SSL termination and
work well with Tomcat's cookie- and URL-based sticky session mechanism.
Does anyone have any recommendations?
If Apache httpd is just as good for an environment that gets
All,
I'm looking for a modest load balancer to perform SSL termination and
work well with Tomcat's cookie- and URL-based sticky session mechanism.
Does anyone have any recommendations?
If Apache httpd is just as good for an environment that gets thousands
of hits per day, not millions
On 11/11/2010 14:12, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I'm looking for a modest load balancer to perform SSL termination and
work well with Tomcat's cookie- and URL-based sticky session mechanism.
Does anyone have any recommendations?
Decent H/W usually cost $$$
If Apache httpd is just
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 11/11/2010 14:12, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I'm looking for a modest load balancer to perform SSL termination and
work well with Tomcat's cookie- and URL-based sticky session mechanism.
Does anyone have any
-
From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 | Load Balancer IP configuration added as virtual host
On 13/08/2010 14:13, Honey Bajaj wrote:
Based on the below details, I am trying to understand the meaning of jmxproxy
[mailto:p...@pidster.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 | Load Balancer IP configuration added as virtual host
On 13/08/2010 14:13, Honey Bajaj wrote:
Based on the below details, I am trying to understand the meaning of
jmxproxy output
Message-
From: Honey Bajaj [mailto:hbaj...@sapient.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:50 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat 6 | Load Balancer IP configuration added as virtual host
Hi,
I have an active-passive configuration of tomcat 6.0.18 running an ebxml
based B2B
[mailto:hbaj...@sapient.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:50 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat 6 | Load Balancer IP configuration added as virtual host
Hi,
I have an active-passive configuration of tomcat 6.0.18 running an ebxml based
B2B gateway solution. The server is configured
works as expected for couple
of hours but after that we start receiving failures, the only thing I can
figure out from jmxproxy (manager application) is an additional virtual host
directive being added containing load balancer IP/Port details, below is the
jmx output for before and after failure
So I have what appears to be an obscure issue which is a consequence of our
architecture and am wondering if anyone's run into anything similar and if
my proposed solution is valid. So here's the background of our setup: We
run our tomcat by starting it within a simple container using the
...@orbitz.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Mon Jul 26 15:48:32 2010
Subject: SSL terminated at load balancer, Http11Processor sends ssl redirects
to :80
So I have what appears to be an obscure issue which is a consequence of our
architecture and am wondering if anyone's run
On 26.07.2010 21:48, Leinartas, Michael wrote:
So I have what appears to be an obscure issue which is a consequence of our
architecture and am wondering if anyone's run into anything similar and if
my proposed solution is valid. So here's the background of our setup: We
run our tomcat by
: SSL terminated at load balancer, Http11Processor sends ssl
redirects to :80
On 26.07.2010 21:48, Leinartas, Michael wrote:
So I have what appears to be an obscure issue which is a consequence of our
architecture and am wondering if anyone's run into anything similar and if
my proposed
So I thought my solution was not good until I read you were getting the https
requests on port 8443 but ssl terminated.
Our configuration terminates ssl at the load balancer but forwards to port 80!
Which is why I couldn't get the normal options working for me.
John-Paul Ranaudo
Software
-To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:48:19 -0500
To: users@tomcat.apache.org users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: SSL terminated at load balancer, Http11Processor sends ssl
redirects to :80
So I thought my solution was not good until I read you were getting
charged in
session, when load balancer try to use the Tomcat2 some info is saved
but other info is missing.
We need to know good arguments to justify to the client, why we should
use sticky session in true to avoid this missing data issue. The client
doesn't want to use sticky session in TRUE
all the user info charged in
session, when load balancer try to use the Tomcat2 some info is saved
but other info is missing.
We need to know good arguments to justify to the client, why we should
use sticky session in true to avoid this missing data issue. The client
doesn't want to use sticky
Hi,
i have installed Apache 2.2 and two Tomcat 6 whit load balancing in
cluster mode using mod_jk module and setting sticky session in TRUE,
and memory replication. I was testing my project and work perfect.
We have a dilemma using sticky session or not using it, with my team work.
Setting
Emilio Recio wrote:
Hi,
i have installed Apache 2.2 and two Tomcat 6 whit load balancing in
cluster mode using mod_jk module and setting sticky session in TRUE,
and memory replication. I was testing my project and work perfect.
We have a dilemma using sticky session or not using it, with my
, to support fail-over.
STICKY SESSION FALSE:
Some times: Tomcat1 after the login, has all the user info charged
in session, when load balancer try to use the Tomcat2 some info is saved
but other info is missing.
We need to know good arguments to justify to the client, why we should
use sticky
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
