Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-15 Thread Hacim Bengali
Road, Chennai Ph: +91 98417 10021 Fonenet: (India) 550 - 16814 Mirou, Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/14/2006 08:09 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org cc: Subject:RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5 Hello

Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Peter Rossbach
Am 13.11.2006 um 20:27 schrieb David O'Dell: Is anyone using session replication in production? Yes, at really big sites :-) Is there an alternative to using multicasting? No, but you can implement you own membership service. In the doc

RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Mirou, Antoine
: mardi 14 novembre 2006 09:31 À : Tomcat Users List Objet : Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5 Am 13.11.2006 um 20:27 schrieb David O'Dell: Is anyone using session replication in production? Yes, at really big sites :-) Is there an alternative to using multicasting? No, but you can implement

RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Mohan . Narayanaswamy
users@tomcat.apache.org cc: Subject:RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5 Hello, Could you please give an example of really big sites ? How do you organize your cluster (how many members/domains, ...) ? Do you use Farm-deployer ? Do you use session replication ? How do you

RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Mark Hagger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5 99.99% gives you a whole 3153 mins per year, or 52 hours, or 1 hour per week of operation per year. Your premise is well taken, but the math is a bit shaky. 99.99% uptime per week equates to 1 minute

Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Mark Hagger
: mardi 14 novembre 2006 09:31 À : Tomcat Users List Objet : Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5 Am 13.11.2006 um 20:27 schrieb David O'Dell: Is anyone using session replication in production? Yes, at really big sites :-) Is there an alternative to using multicasting? No, but you can

Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Mark Hagger
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 16:49, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: Your premise is well taken, but the math is a bit shaky. 99.99% uptime per week equates to 1 minute of downtime in that period, not one hour, which emphasizes you point even more. Ooops, how embarrassing, I calculated everything

RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Tim Lucia
: David O'Dell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:27 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: session replication/tomcat 5.5 Is anyone using session replication in production? Is there an alternative to using multicasting? In the doc http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/cluster

Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread David O'Dell
, November 13, 2006 2:27 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: session replication/tomcat 5.5 Is anyone using session replication in production? Is there an alternative to using multicasting? In the doc http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/cluster-howto.html It states This is an algorithm

RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Tim Lucia
with the vital MRTG graphs on display. Tim -Original Message- From: David O'Dell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:03 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5 Good to hear that someone is using this. I want to try this out in my

RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Tim Lucia
, 2006 4:29 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5 I forgot to mention that we peak at about 6000 sessions on the average day. The all-time max for 2006 is 6810 sessions. For monitoring, we do several things. 1) We use lambda probe 2) We use MRTG and some scripts

Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Rainer Jung
in the engineering department visible to most of us with the vital MRTG graphs on display. Tim -Original Message- From: David O'Dell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:03 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5 Good to hear

Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Dan Baumann
transforms the XML to HTML. Regards, Dan -Original Message- From: Tim Lucia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 4:29 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5 I forgot to mention that we peak at about 6000 sessions on the average day

RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-14 Thread Tim Lucia
PERFECT! Thanks to you and Dan Baumann... -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 4:59 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5 Have a look at: http://yourserver:yourport/manager/jmxproxy?qry

session replication/tomcat 5.5

2006-11-13 Thread David O'Dell
Is anyone using session replication in production? Is there an alternative to using multicasting? In the doc http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/cluster-howto.html It states This is an algorithm that is only efficient when the clusters are small. I have 6 tomcat instances behind a load