Anybody using Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.5.17 on Windowa 2003
Has anybody successfully managed to run Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.5.17 on Windows 2003 on a real production server, and not just as a test system? We are still experiencing frequent TCP Connections Aborted errors (err=53) for no apparent reasons, and because of that our live server becomes unresponsive to clients and we end up re-booting our server machine once or twice a week. (see http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html for more details) This problem even occurs with firewall and anti-virus software all switched off. Rainer Jung suggested to try out a Microsoft Hotfix (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925513) which we are still waiting for to receive from Microsoft Technet, and once its there, we will try it out. J.Neuhoff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Anybody-using-Apache-2.0.59-and-Tomcat-5.5.17-on-Windowa-2003-tf3200025.html#a8884601 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions
Rashmi Rubdi wrote: I'm sorry that I didn't express myself in a clear manner. I was simply saying that the jsessionid doesn't appear when bots access pages that have sessions in them (in my case), but I'm not concerned with it as it doesn't affect anything. I worked it out after i'd had a coffee, I was just being dense. :) I think the only way to be sure what's going on would be to monitor what's being set in the response headers for bots. If there's a 'Set-Cookie' header it would explain why there's no redirect URL encoding. Whether the bot then sends the cookie back to maintain the session is a different matter of course... rgds, p -Regards Rashmi - Original Message From: Pid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2007 8:46:22 AM Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions Rashmi Rubdi wrote: I agree that many have experienced the jsessionid on URLs accessed by bots, perhaps it happens in a Struts environment or some other environment. In certain set-ups (only JSPs, no servlets, no MVC - session is removed and created freshly on each JSP page) the jsessionid doesn't appear on URLs accessed by bots like Googlebot even when the JSP page uses sessions, and that confuses me. I've verified the absense of jsession id in the URLs accessed by Googlebot in the server logs. This inconsistent appearance of jsessionid for certain set-ups doesn't bother me, it's just a matter of curiosity. hi rashmi, i'm not sure what you're saying; are you asking a question? -Rashmi - Original Message From: Pid [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some bots also use sessions. I disagree, the bot has no capability to decide to use a session. A bot would only appear to use a session if it was HTTP/1.1 capable, and was handling cookies or encoded URLs properly. Most bots get pages asynchronously, I've observed Googlebot hitting url encoded pages with jsessionids generated days beforehand, during a previous index run. This will trigger a new session as a result, but may account for apparently older creation dates appearing the list of active/recent session. (A guess: I don't know enough about the internals of Tomcat to be sure of that.) p Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OutOfMemoryError (but not really out of memory?) cause tomcat processes to hang
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/memory.html If you have a lot of servlets or JSP's, you may need to increase your permanent generation. By default, it is 64MB. Doubling it to be -XX:MaxPermSize=256m might be a good start. Pardon the bad math in the faq since 64*2!=256 ;) -Tim Nikola Milutinovic wrote: PS Perm Generation capacity = 22675456 (21.625MB) used = 22515408 (21.472366333007812MB) free = 160048 (0.1526336669921875MB) 99.2941795746026% used Here is the failure. PermGen is getting exhausted. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Anybody using Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.5.17 on Windows 2003
Hi, I am using Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.0.28 with mod_jk 1.2.20 on Windows 2003 SP1 but the system have some issue on the socket layer. In fact, after some time, some users are able to crash our architecture: apache answers to request such as *.html but mod_jk says it cannot connect to tomcat. Even a restart of services doesn't change anythink. Tomcat is running and answer for simple hello world jsp pages but cannot answer to /manage/html. I patch windows with KB 931311 and it seems to work properly. JNeuhoff wrote: Has anybody successfully managed to run Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.5.17 on Windows 2003 on a real production server, and not just as a test system? We are still experiencing frequent TCP Connections Aborted errors (err=53) for no apparent reasons, and because of that our live server becomes unresponsive to clients and we end up re-booting our server machine once or twice a week. (see http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html for more details) This problem even occurs with firewall and anti-virus software all switched off. Rainer Jung suggested to try out a Microsoft Hotfix (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925513) which we are still waiting for to receive from Microsoft Technet, and once its there, we will try it out. J.Neuhoff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Anybody-using-Apache-2.0.59-and-Tomcat-5.5.17-on-Windows-2003-tf3200025.html#a8887082 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OutOfMemoryError (but not really out of memory?) cause tomcat processes to hang
| From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Friday, 09 February, 2007 06:30 | | Pardon the bad math in the faq since 64*2!=256 ;) Obviously you were thinking 64 2 -- happens to everybody... ;) - The information contained in this message is confidential proprietary property of Nelnet, Inc. and its affiliated companies (Nelnet) and is intended for the recipient only. Any reproduction, forwarding, or copying without the express permission of Nelnet is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions
Thanks for explaining, I looked at some of the access log archives where I used
the %{Cookie}i in the pattern, and for the bots it shows as -, but for
browser access it shows the cookie information.
See the _ at the end of this is the cookie information from Googlebot
127.0.0.1 - [11/Sep/2006:12:06:36 -0800] GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1 200 13165
- Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
-
At the end of this the cookie string is from a IE 6.0 browser
127.0.0.1 - [11/Sep/2006:12:07:00 -0800] GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1 200 6818 -
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
InfoPath.1) __utma=119444884.1604301826.1157946192.1157960979.1157976677.6;
__utmz=119444884.1157961053.5.5.utmccn=(organic)|utmcsr=google|utmctr=searched+key+word|utmcmd=organic
But earlier you had mentioned something about HTTP/1.1 capable agent, another
sample of the access log shows that the bots are HTTP/1.1 capable - sorry I
don't have the custom pattern used here, since I kept changing it often.
66.249.66.198 HTTP/1.1 - [31/Oct/2006:22:04:59 -0800] GET /index.jsp
HTTP/1.1 200 8622 - Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1;
+http://www.google.com/bot.html)
74.6.75.14 HTTP/1.1 - [31/Oct/2006:22:04:44 -0800] GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.1
200 273 - Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! Slurp;
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/ysearch/slurp)
64.4.8.116 HTTP/1.1 - [31/Oct/2006:17:50:19 -0800] GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.1
200 273 - msnbot/1.0 (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)
In the above cases index.jsp is using sessions, and so are almost all other JSP
pages on the web app.
So since bots are HTTP/1.1 capable that might explain why I don't see
jsessionid appended to the jsp pages in the access logs.
-Rashmi
- Original Message
From: Pid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 9, 2007 7:10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions
Rashmi Rubdi wrote:
I'm sorry that I didn't express myself in a clear manner. I was simply saying
that the jsessionid doesn't appear when bots access pages that have sessions
in them (in my case), but I'm not concerned with it as it doesn't affect
anything.
I worked it out after i'd had a coffee, I was just being dense. :)
I think the only way to be sure what's going on would be to monitor
what's being set in the response headers for bots. If there's a
'Set-Cookie' header it would explain why there's no redirect URL encoding.
Whether the bot then sends the cookie back to maintain the session is a
different matter of course...
rgds,
p
-Regards
Rashmi
- Original Message
From: Pid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2007 8:46:22 AM
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions
Rashmi Rubdi wrote:
I agree that many have experienced the jsessionid on URLs accessed by bots,
perhaps it happens in a Struts environment or some other environment.
In certain set-ups (only JSPs, no servlets, no MVC - session is removed and
created freshly on each JSP page) the jsessionid doesn't appear on URLs
accessed by bots like Googlebot even when the JSP page uses sessions, and
that confuses me. I've verified the absense of jsession id in the URLs
accessed by Googlebot in the server logs.
This inconsistent appearance of jsessionid for certain set-ups doesn't
bother me, it's just a matter of curiosity.
hi rashmi,
i'm not sure what you're saying; are you asking a question?
-Rashmi
- Original Message
From: Pid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some bots also use sessions.
I disagree, the bot has no capability to decide to use a session.
A bot would only appear to use a session if it was HTTP/1.1 capable, and
was handling cookies or encoded URLs properly.
Most bots get pages asynchronously, I've observed Googlebot hitting url
encoded pages with jsessionids generated days beforehand, during a
previous index run. This will trigger a new session as a result, but
may account for apparently older creation dates appearing the list of
active/recent session.
(A guess: I don't know enough about the internals of Tomcat to be sure
of that.)
p
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions
Rashmi Rubdi wrote: So since bots are HTTP/1.1 capable that might explain why I don't see jsessionid appended to the jsp pages in the access logs. ...and the cookie is only recorded when the client sends it, not when the server sets it, so it doesn't appear in the log. -Rashmi - Original Message From: Pid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 9, 2007 7:10:49 AM Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions Rashmi Rubdi wrote: I'm sorry that I didn't express myself in a clear manner. I was simply saying that the jsessionid doesn't appear when bots access pages that have sessions in them (in my case), but I'm not concerned with it as it doesn't affect anything. I worked it out after i'd had a coffee, I was just being dense. :) I think the only way to be sure what's going on would be to monitor what's being set in the response headers for bots. If there's a 'Set-Cookie' header it would explain why there's no redirect URL encoding. Whether the bot then sends the cookie back to maintain the session is a different matter of course... rgds, p -Regards Rashmi - Original Message From: Pid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2007 8:46:22 AM Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions Rashmi Rubdi wrote: I agree that many have experienced the jsessionid on URLs accessed by bots, perhaps it happens in a Struts environment or some other environment. In certain set-ups (only JSPs, no servlets, no MVC - session is removed and created freshly on each JSP page) the jsessionid doesn't appear on URLs accessed by bots like Googlebot even when the JSP page uses sessions, and that confuses me. I've verified the absense of jsession id in the URLs accessed by Googlebot in the server logs. This inconsistent appearance of jsessionid for certain set-ups doesn't bother me, it's just a matter of curiosity. hi rashmi, i'm not sure what you're saying; are you asking a question? -Rashmi - Original Message From: Pid [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some bots also use sessions. I disagree, the bot has no capability to decide to use a session. A bot would only appear to use a session if it was HTTP/1.1 capable, and was handling cookies or encoded URLs properly. Most bots get pages asynchronously, I've observed Googlebot hitting url encoded pages with jsessionids generated days beforehand, during a previous index run. This will trigger a new session as a result, but may account for apparently older creation dates appearing the list of active/recent session. (A guess: I don't know enough about the internals of Tomcat to be sure of that.) p No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deadlock in Tomcat 5.5.20
Hi all, This might not be the right forum for this. Let em know if I should post this to the tomcat-dev alias. THE PROBLEM The problem we are experience is that occasionally Tomcat (5.5.20) is deadlocking; see the attached output from a kill -3 on the tomcat process. Has anyone seen this happen? Did you discover why this is happening? And most importantly: How did you fix it? THE BACKGROUND I am working on a project in which our architecture requires pluggable modules. In the first two iterations, we avoided that requirement by building all modules into a single ROOT.war webapp. Now in this iteration we are teasing apart these into separately loaded moduleXYZ.war files. This has caused lots of headaches; especially around getting JSF to handle cross-context (cross-webapp) navigation and bean management. We have pretty much solved the JSF issues, some fixes required doing things like performing cross-context dispatching and merging of JSF's RuntimeConfig objects from each webapp ServletContext. However, I don't see how any of these changes would cause the deadlock. Sincere thanks, Bryan Java2D Disposer daemon prio=1 tid=0x08af2f10 nid=0xf1d in Object.wait() [0x9bda3000..0x9bda40d0] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0xa03bf8a8 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:116) - locked 0xa03bf8a8 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:132) at sun.java2d.Disposer.run(Disposer.java:107) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) Timer-3 daemon prio=1 tid=0x083667f8 nid=0xe9c in Object.wait() [0x9be41000..0x9be42150] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x9ff8d648 (a java.util.TaskQueue) at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:509) - locked 0x9ff8d648 (a java.util.TaskQueue) at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:462) TP-Monitor daemon prio=1 tid=0x0837ab30 nid=0xe9b in Object.wait() [0x9bec2000..0x9bec2ed0] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x9ff8d688 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$MonitorRunnable) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$MonitorRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:559) - locked 0x9ff8d688 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$MonitorRunnable) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) TP-Processor4 daemon prio=1 tid=0x083615e8 nid=0xe9a runnable [0x9bf43000..0x9bf43e50] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:384) - locked 0x9ff8d6b0 (a java.net.SocksSocketImpl) at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:450) at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:421) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.accept(ChannelSocket.java:306) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.acceptConnections(ChannelSocket.java:660) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket$SocketAcceptor.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:870) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) TP-Processor3 daemon prio=1 tid=0x083603d0 nid=0xe99 in Object.wait() [0x9bfc4000..0x9bfc4fd0] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x9ff8d8d8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:656) - locked 0x9ff8d8d8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) TP-Processor2 daemon prio=1 tid=0x0835f288 nid=0xe98 in Object.wait() [0x9c045000..0x9c045f50] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x9ff8d8f8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:656) - locked 0x9ff8d8f8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deadlock in Tomcat 5.5.20
So where's the deadlock in this stack dump? Bryan Basham wrote: Hi all, This might not be the right forum for this. Let em know if I should post this to the tomcat-dev alias. THE PROBLEM The problem we are experience is that occasionally Tomcat (5.5.20) is deadlocking; see the attached output from a kill -3 on the tomcat process. Has anyone seen this happen? Did you discover why this is happening? And most importantly: How did you fix it? THE BACKGROUND I am working on a project in which our architecture requires pluggable modules. In the first two iterations, we avoided that requirement by building all modules into a single ROOT.war webapp. Now in this iteration we are teasing apart these into separately loaded moduleXYZ.war files. This has caused lots of headaches; especially around getting JSF to handle cross-context (cross-webapp) navigation and bean management. We have pretty much solved the JSF issues, some fixes required doing things like performing cross-context dispatching and merging of JSF's RuntimeConfig objects from each webapp ServletContext. However, I don't see how any of these changes would cause the deadlock. Sincere thanks, Bryan Java2D Disposer daemon prio=1 tid=0x08af2f10 nid=0xf1d in Object.wait() [0x9bda3000..0x9bda40d0] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0xa03bf8a8 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:116) - locked 0xa03bf8a8 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:132) at sun.java2d.Disposer.run(Disposer.java:107) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) Timer-3 daemon prio=1 tid=0x083667f8 nid=0xe9c in Object.wait() [0x9be41000..0x9be42150] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x9ff8d648 (a java.util.TaskQueue) at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:509) - locked 0x9ff8d648 (a java.util.TaskQueue) at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:462) TP-Monitor daemon prio=1 tid=0x0837ab30 nid=0xe9b in Object.wait() [0x9bec2000..0x9bec2ed0] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x9ff8d688 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$MonitorRunnable) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$MonitorRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:559) - locked 0x9ff8d688 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$MonitorRunnable) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) TP-Processor4 daemon prio=1 tid=0x083615e8 nid=0xe9a runnable [0x9bf43000..0x9bf43e50] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:384) - locked 0x9ff8d6b0 (a java.net.SocksSocketImpl) at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:450) at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:421) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.accept(ChannelSocket.java:306) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.acceptConnections(ChannelSocket.java:660) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket$SocketAcceptor.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:870) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) TP-Processor3 daemon prio=1 tid=0x083603d0 nid=0xe99 in Object.wait() [0x9bfc4000..0x9bfc4fd0] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x9ff8d8d8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:656) - locked 0x9ff8d8d8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) TP-Processor2 daemon prio=1 tid=0x0835f288 nid=0xe98 in Object.wait() [0x9c045000..0x9c045f50] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x9ff8d8f8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:656) - locked 0x9ff8d8f8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connection Pool configuration
ok, thanks FooShyn. -Original Message- From: Foo Shyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:36 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Connection Pool configuration Hi, I'm not sure bout Tomcat 4.0, but i think in 4.1 u could do it through the admin page. Just create a Datasource under ur apps context should do the trick. Thanx. Regards, FooShyn - Original Message - From: Propes, Barry L [GCG-NAOT] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 12:01 AM Subject: Connection Pool configuration Hello, I'm dealing with Tomcat 4.0.1 and -4.1.3. I badly need to get connection pooling configured, but am not quite sure how to do it. Here's a block from my server.xml file. Realm className=org.apache.catalina.realm.JDBCRealm debug=99 driverName=oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver connectionURL=jdbc:oracle:thin:@169.xxx.xx.xxx:1521:SID connectionName=user_name connectionPassword=user_pwd userTable=users userNameCol=user_name userCredCol=user_pass userRoleTable=user_roles roleNameCol=role_name / This goes to the users table created for password sessions. Do I configure anything here for Connection Pooling? Do I add maxActive 8 minIdle 0 , etc.? How would I alter or configure this? Any advice is welcomed. Thanks, Barry No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.30/674 - Release Date: 2/7/2007 3:33 PM - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please help me about loading javascript...
while that's difficult to read, let me see if I interpreted correctly. While loading a webpage from the localhost URL the javascript file included in that web page does not fully load, and in the middle of loading, hangs or crashes? And then you open the page in Internet Explorer it reads done? Not sure what you're trying to accomplish per se, but if in the BODY tag of the JSP/HTML page, whatever it is, if you'll put the onLoad() command there and call the function accordingly. Example body onLoad=gotoPage(); where gotoPage() is a function referencing a js script up in the head tags. Is this what you're trying to do? Let me know if that helps you. -Original Message- From: Le Phuoc Canh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:13 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Please help me about loading javascript... I don't know why loading a webpage from localhost, file javascript which include in that webpage not loading full, it will stop at the middle, while i open that webpage direct by internet explore, i will done. Please help me about it. Thanks a lot Best Regard. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions
I hope all this 'bot' talk doesn't prevent a resolution to the bug long-standing bug regarding sessions that never terminate, long after they should have expired. All of our web apps have a background thread that periodically terminates sessions that haven't been accessed in 24 hours, even though most of our web apps should auto-expire after 30 minutes, with the longest one being 120 minutes because users need to fill out a lengthy form. David - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions
This message has been marked as Off-Topic with [OT] , so that it doesn't stand in the way of the main thread. Here's where one can report a bug : http://tomcat.apache.org/bugreport.html (unless it hasn't been reported already). -Rashmi - Original Message From: David Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 9, 2007 1:00:02 PM Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Large number of active sessions I hope all this 'bot' talk doesn't prevent a resolution to the bug long-standing bug regarding sessions that never terminate, long after they should have expired. All of our web apps have a background thread that periodically terminates sessions that haven't been accessed in 24 hours, even though most of our web apps should auto-expire after 30 minutes, with the longest one being 120 minutes because users need to fill out a lengthy form. David - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail QA for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396546091 - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deadlock in Tomcat 5.5.20
Upon reflection my team has decided that it is some strange interaction between Firefox and our VMware instance running Tomcat. If we kill Firefox, then Tomcat resumes processing requests. How bizarre. Sorry to waste the bandwidth. -Bryan - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deadlock in Tomcat 5.5.20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bryan, Rainer Jung wrote: So where's the deadlock in this stack dump? Yeah... there are no interesting threads in there. Did you post the wrong thread dump? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFzMHN9CaO5/Lv0PARAtojAKCjk/PooJirr1hIMp8by//BSF/IPQCgjKGb ACgNjifTgpVTrMwR95e8pww= =Vjs5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Anybody using Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.5.17 on Windows 2003
I assume you are talking about the hotfix http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931311/en-us , I am going to ask our sysadmins to get this hotfix, too. Thanks for sharing your experience with us on this forum. J.Neuhoff RChartier wrote: Hi, I am using Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.0.28 with mod_jk 1.2.20 on Windows 2003 SP1 but the system have some issue on the socket layer. In fact, after some time, some users are able to crash our architecture: apache answers to request such as *.html but mod_jk says it cannot connect to tomcat. Even a restart of services doesn't change anythink. Tomcat is running and answer for simple hello world jsp pages but cannot answer to /manage/html. I patch windows with KB 931311 and it seems to work properly. JNeuhoff wrote: Has anybody successfully managed to run Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.5.17 on Windows 2003 on a real production server, and not just as a test system? We are still experiencing frequent TCP Connections Aborted errors (err=53) for no apparent reasons, and because of that our live server becomes unresponsive to clients and we end up re-booting our server machine once or twice a week. (see http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html for more details) This problem even occurs with firewall and anti-virus software all switched off. Rainer Jung suggested to try out a Microsoft Hotfix (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925513) which we are still waiting for to receive from Microsoft Technet, and once its there, we will try it out. J.Neuhoff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Anybody-using-Apache-2.0.59-and-Tomcat-5.5.17-on-Windows-2003-tf3200025.html#a8891871 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] mod_jk - tomcat sending delay
Hi, We are also facing same problem and we are using mod_jk 1.2.6 with apache 2.0.53 and tomcat 5.0.27. Mod_jk is configured with loadbalancer. We have Apache+mod_jk with LB + 9 tomcats in backend. Mod_jk is set with sticky bit set. Partial workers.properites worker.list=loadbalancer worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=tc_1_1,tc_1_2,tc_1_3,tc_2_1,tc_2_2,tc_2_3,tc_3_1,tc_3_2,tc_3_3 worker.tc_1_1.host=cna-prod-app-25 worker.tc_1_1.port=8000 worker.tc_1_1.type=ajp13 worker.tc_1_1.lbfactor=1 worker.tc_1_1.cachesize=50 worker.tc_1_1.cache_timeout=180 worker.tc_1_1.socket_timeout=300 worker.tc_1_1.socket_keepalive=1 worker.tc_1_1.recovery_options=0 worker.tc_1_1.sticky_session=1 server.xml Connector port=8000 protocol=AJP/1.3 address=cna-prod-app-25 minProcessors=50 maxProcessors=100 enableLookups=false debug=0 URIEncoding=UTF-8 connectionTimeout=18 / I found in one of discussion board, that connection timeout in sever.xml and timeout parameters in workers.properties should be matched properly and also found that in server.xml its in miliseconds and in workers.properites it is seconds. We do not find any issue at client side but erorr keeps going in mod_jk log. ( I am not sure of client side issues are there or not) mod_jk log [Fri Feb 09 22:00:55 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:00:55 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:00:55 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_3_3 failed errno = 0 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.109:8002), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_1_3 failed errno = 0 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8001), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_2_2 failed errno = 0 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:44 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.109:8000), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:44 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:01:44 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=0 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:03 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8002), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:03 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:02:03 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:49 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8002), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:49 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:02:49 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=0 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:59 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8001), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:59 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:02:59 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:59 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_2_2 failed errno = 0 If you find any
Problems with Apache and Tomcat talking
Here is the error I am getting in my log file * [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (196)]: In jk_endpoint_t::connect_to_tomcat, failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (635)]: Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (848)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, send_request failed in send loop 0 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (196)]: In jk_endpoint_t::connect_to_tomcat, failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (635)]: Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (848)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, send_request failed in send loop 1 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (196)]: In jk_endpoint_t::connect_to_tomcat, failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (635)]: Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (848)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, send_request failed in send loop 2 Now, we are using Groupwise WebAccess. When I go to my webmail site, It pulls up an index page that autoredirects to the /servlet/webacc. This is where Tomcat should pick up the request and fire up the webacc servlet. I am only recieving the server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. More information about this error may be available in the server error log. I have gone back and forth through the settings in the Apache folder and in the Tomcat folder to see if a port was mistyped or something, but I have found nothing. If you could give me an idea of how to go about troubleshooting this error I would be apprecative. --- Travis Taggart Director of Information Technology River Valley Behavioral Health Phone: 1.270.689.6600 Fax: 1.270.689.6677 --- DISCLAIMER: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole purpose or delivery tothe intended recipient. If you have received this transmiission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination or this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail or at (270) 689-6600 and delete this message and its attachments, if any.
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: jsp.error.beans.property.conversion
I've been working on migrating an application from Resin to Tomcat-5.5.17 and have one particular JSP and bean that's got me stumped. When using jsp:setProperty property=*, I get the following exception and stack trace: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: jsp.error.beans.property.conversion at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.internalIntrospecthelper(JspRuntimeLibrary.java:359) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.introspecthelper(JspRuntimeLibrary.java:306) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.introspect(JspRuntimeLibrary.java:284) at org.apache.jsp.callinquirylist_jsp._jspService(callinquirylist_jsp.java:261) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:332) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:314) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:264) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:252) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:672) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationDispatcher.java:463) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:398) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:301) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.doForward(PageContextImpl.java:703) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.forward(PageContextImpl.java:670) at org.apache.jsp.callinquiryredirect_jsp._jspService(callinquiryredirect_jsp.java:169) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:332) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:314) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:264) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:252) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) at com.telesoft.web.GZIPFilter.doFilter(GZIPFilter.java:67) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:202) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProcessor.process(Http11AprProcessor.java:833) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11AprProtocol.java:639) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AprEndpoint$Worker.run(AprEndpoint.java:1285) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) If I instead explicitly list each parameter, it works. Suspecting a bean introspection issue, I wrote a little ditty that checks the type of each bean property and the parameter type of its setter method. All match. I also checked all request parameters against matching property setters in bean and no mismatches. What should I look for? I've reviewed JspRuntimeLibrary.internalIntrospecthelper() and only candidates I see are the method invocations. Many thanks. -- Regards, Scott Dudley _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] mod_jk replacement?
Hi, I am also running with same problem, Please let me know if any settings have helped to solve this problem. With regards, Babulal Satasiya Cisco System Inc. Sanjose, CA JNeuhoff wrote: Do I remember correctly, that Apache and Tomcat are on the same machine? Is there a firewall on this machine? They are both on the same machine. Apache is listening to a dedicated IP-address, on port 80, while Tomcat is configured to using localhost, and listens to port 8080 (http) and 8009 (ajp1.3). There is no firewall on that machine, because it is located behind a campus-wide firewall on a University network. The latter has opened up port 80 for that machine to outside users. The file might get big. I could download from a web site or similar. I'll be away for two days, so don't expect an answer before friday. Thank you very much, I can upload the mod_jk.log tomorrow after the new test with the updated settings and let you know on Friday. J.Neuhoff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html#a8894778 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows Authentication against multiple domains
Hi, I am having a tomcat webapplication and logon needs to be done via windows-authentication (ldap). I configured authentication against ldap, that works fine for one domain. The problem is, that we are having users in multiple domains. Is there a way to configure authentication against the whole active directory forest? Thanks for your help! Uwe
RE: Windows Authentication against multiple domains
if you find out, please let me know...I'm barking up that tree, too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:50 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Windows Authentication against multiple domains Hi, I am having a tomcat webapplication and logon needs to be done via windows-authentication (ldap). I configured authentication against ldap, that works fine for one domain. The problem is, that we are having users in multiple domains. Is there a way to configure authentication against the whole active directory forest? Thanks for your help! Uwe - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows Authentication against multiple domains
Sure, I will let you know. Perhaps we need third party tools. Doese someone knows a solution? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Windows-Authentication-against-multiple-domains-tf3203321.html#a8895171 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Windows Authentication against multiple domains
Hello, We have this capability in our open source identity and access management solution where you can use more then one use more then one repository for authentication. You may be able to use just the authentication service as taking on the rest of it may be more then what you need. The project is OpenIAM on sourceforge. We will be putting a new release this weekend. If you are interested in taking a look, let me know and I can send you a link. Regards Suneet On 2/9/07, Uwe_77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure, I will let you know. Perhaps we need third party tools. Doese someone knows a solution? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Windows-Authentication-against-multiple-domains-tf3203321.html#a8895171 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat SSL configure for only one application.
Hi, I want to configure my tomcat server for use ssl but I have some applicatións working on this server and I don't want that all application work with ssl, just only one will work with ssl support. How do I do that? Thanks. -- Gracias. Atentamente, Carlos Arturo Trujillo Silva Ingeniero de Sistemas
Re: [OT] mod_jk - tomcat sending delay
Version 1.2.6 of mod_jk is an antiquity. First update before investigating the problem. babu wrote: Hi, We are also facing same problem and we are using mod_jk 1.2.6 with apache 2.0.53 and tomcat 5.0.27. Mod_jk is configured with loadbalancer. We have Apache+mod_jk with LB + 9 tomcats in backend. Mod_jk is set with sticky bit set. Partial workers.properites worker.list=loadbalancer worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=tc_1_1,tc_1_2,tc_1_3,tc_2_1,tc_2_2,tc_2_3,tc_3_1,tc_3_2,tc_3_3 worker.tc_1_1.host=cna-prod-app-25 worker.tc_1_1.port=8000 worker.tc_1_1.type=ajp13 worker.tc_1_1.lbfactor=1 worker.tc_1_1.cachesize=50 worker.tc_1_1.cache_timeout=180 worker.tc_1_1.socket_timeout=300 worker.tc_1_1.socket_keepalive=1 worker.tc_1_1.recovery_options=0 worker.tc_1_1.sticky_session=1 server.xml Connector port=8000 protocol=AJP/1.3 address=cna-prod-app-25 minProcessors=50 maxProcessors=100 enableLookups=false debug=0 URIEncoding=UTF-8 connectionTimeout=18 / I found in one of discussion board, that connection timeout in sever.xml and timeout parameters in workers.properties should be matched properly and also found that in server.xml its in miliseconds and in workers.properites it is seconds. We do not find any issue at client side but erorr keeps going in mod_jk log. ( I am not sure of client side issues are there or not) mod_jk log [Fri Feb 09 22:00:55 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:00:55 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:00:55 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_3_3 failed errno = 0 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.109:8002), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_1_3 failed errno = 0 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8001), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_2_2 failed errno = 0 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:44 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.109:8000), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:44 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:01:44 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=0 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:03 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8002), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:03 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:02:03 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:49 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8002), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:49 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:02:49 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=0 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:59 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8001), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:59 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:02:59 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:59 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is
Re: Problems with Apache and Tomcat talking
You should tell us, which versions and platform you are using, and also your config. I guess you are running on Windows. 61 relates to Winsock error 10061, which is connection refused. So it's likely host and port of your worker do not match ip and port of your tomcat server. Also your logs look like you are using a very outdated version of mod_jk. Regards, Rainer Travis Taggart wrote: Here is the error I am getting in my log file * [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (196)]: In jk_endpoint_t::connect_to_tomcat, failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (635)]: Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (848)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, send_request failed in send loop 0 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (196)]: In jk_endpoint_t::connect_to_tomcat, failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (635)]: Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (848)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, send_request failed in send loop 1 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (196)]: In jk_endpoint_t::connect_to_tomcat, failed errno = 61 [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (635)]: Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (848)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, send_request failed in send loop 2 Now, we are using Groupwise WebAccess. When I go to my webmail site, It pulls up an index page that autoredirects to the /servlet/webacc. This is where Tomcat should pick up the request and fire up the webacc servlet. I am only recieving the server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. More information about this error may be available in the server error log. I have gone back and forth through the settings in the Apache folder and in the Tomcat folder to see if a port was mistyped or something, but I have found nothing. If you could give me an idea of how to go about troubleshooting this error I would be apprecative. --- Travis Taggart Director of Information Technology River Valley Behavioral Health Phone: 1.270.689.6600 Fax: 1.270.689.6677 --- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat SSL configure for only one application.
On 2/9/07, Cartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I want to configure my tomcat server for use ssl but I have some applicatións working on this server and I don't want that all application work with ssl, just only one will work with ssl support. How do I do that? Are you talking about different *hosts* or different webapps within the same host? -- Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] mod_jk - tomcat sending delay
Hi, We tried updating it once but we have problem in load balancing and we went back to original mod_jk which we working fine. We upgraded to 1.2.15, but we are planing to try out new one 1.2.20, but I am watching this discussion board and there issues even in 1.2.20 and I have posted because of thius. With regards, Babulal Satasiya Rainer Jung-3 wrote: Version 1.2.6 of mod_jk is an antiquity. First update before investigating the problem. babu wrote: Hi, We are also facing same problem and we are using mod_jk 1.2.6 with apache 2.0.53 and tomcat 5.0.27. Mod_jk is configured with loadbalancer. We have Apache+mod_jk with LB + 9 tomcats in backend. Mod_jk is set with sticky bit set. Partial workers.properites worker.list=loadbalancer worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=tc_1_1,tc_1_2,tc_1_3,tc_2_1,tc_2_2,tc_2_3,tc_3_1,tc_3_2,tc_3_3 worker.tc_1_1.host=cna-prod-app-25 worker.tc_1_1.port=8000 worker.tc_1_1.type=ajp13 worker.tc_1_1.lbfactor=1 worker.tc_1_1.cachesize=50 worker.tc_1_1.cache_timeout=180 worker.tc_1_1.socket_timeout=300 worker.tc_1_1.socket_keepalive=1 worker.tc_1_1.recovery_options=0 worker.tc_1_1.sticky_session=1 server.xml Connector port=8000 protocol=AJP/1.3 address=cna-prod-app-25 minProcessors=50 maxProcessors=100 enableLookups=false debug=0 URIEncoding=UTF-8 connectionTimeout=18 / I found in one of discussion board, that connection timeout in sever.xml and timeout parameters in workers.properties should be matched properly and also found that in server.xml its in miliseconds and in workers.properites it is seconds. We do not find any issue at client side but erorr keeps going in mod_jk log. ( I am not sure of client side issues are there or not) mod_jk log [Fri Feb 09 22:00:55 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:00:55 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:00:55 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_3_3 failed errno = 0 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.109:8002), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:21 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_1_3 failed errno = 0 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8001), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=2 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:41 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1477)]: Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=tc_2_2 failed errno = 0 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:44 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.109:8000), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:01:44 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:01:44 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=0 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:03 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8002), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:03 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:02:03 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:49 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (128.107.229.110:8002), err=-1 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:49 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Fri Feb 09 22:02:49 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=0 [Fri Feb 09 22:02:59 2007] [jk_ajp_common.c
Re: Tomcat SSL configure for only one application.
Yes, different webapps within the same host. On 2/9/07, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/9/07, Cartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I want to configure my tomcat server for use ssl but I have some applicatións working on this server and I don't want that all application work with ssl, just only one will work with ssl support. How do I do that? Are you talking about different *hosts* or different webapps within the same host? -- Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gracias. Atentamente, Carlos Arturo Trujillo Silva Ingeniero de Sistemas
RE: Windows Authentication against multiple domains
I am yet another barking up that tree. --- Propes, Barry L [GCG-NAOT] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if you find out, please let me know...I'm barking up that tree, too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:50 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Windows Authentication against multiple domains Hi, I am having a tomcat webapplication and logon needs to be done via windows-authentication (ldap). I configured authentication against ldap, that works fine for one domain. The problem is, that we are having users in multiple domains. Is there a way to configure authentication against the whole active directory forest? Thanks for your help! Uwe - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
getting Session from SessionId
I am trying to integrate a web application to an external service, and need to be able to take an incoming sessionId from the external service server, and to return details from the session to which that sessionId applies. I understand that there was a getSession(String sessionid) method, in HttpSessionContext which has since been deprecated. Does anyone know how I would do this, with the Servlet 2.3 APIs? We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat SSL configure for only one application.
From: Cartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat SSL configure for only one application. Hi, I want to configure my tomcat server for use ssl but I have some applicatións working on this server and I don't want that all application work with ssl, just only one will work with ssl support. You need to read the servlet spec. SSL is only used for the portion of each webapp that is declared with a security-constraint containing a user-data-constraint of CONFIDENTIAL. Not even the entire webapp has to use SSL. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk - tomcat sending delay
Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: Hi, I observe in mod_jk's log errors: [error] ajp_get_reply::jk_ajp_common.c (1566): (ajp13w) Tomcat is down or refused connection. No response has been sent to the client (yet) All those error messages are 'normal' :) servel.xml Connector port=8009 address=127.0.0.1 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=100 enableLookups=false acceptCount=100 debug=0 connectionTimeout=5000 useURIValidationHack=false protocol=AJP/1.3/ /servel.xml Increase connectionTimeout to 6 (1 minute). The reason you are seeing those messages is because Tomcat closes his part of connection. If you wish to lower down the delay add worker.ajpw13.connection_timeout=6 worker.ajpw13.prepost_timeout=6 Regards, Mladen. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with Apache and Tomcat talking
Travis Taggart wrote: Here is the error I am getting in my log file * [Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 61 All the threads in the Tomcat are busy. Increase the maxThreads for AJP/1.3 connector in server.xml Regards, Mladen. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
