On 12 October 2010 19:47, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
I would.
I believe that is true.
On the other hand, there is another case where you might have problems.
If you have, say, 512 worker threads in Apache httpd but you only have,
say, 200 request processor
On 13 Oct 2010, at 04:44, ramkumar ramku...@efftronics.com wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your response. I dont the communication api version i
think it is 2.0. I searched for latest version but i could not find it for
windows OS. I get it from some uploader site. My WEB-INF\LIB has following
On 13 Oct 2010, at 04:44, ramkumar ramku...@efftronics.com wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your response. I dont the communication api version i
think it is 2.0. I searched for latest version but i could not find it for
windows OS. I get it from some uploader site. My WEB-INF\LIB has following
Hi
I'm not playing chase-the-answer with you
Nither am I , Replying as per u'r mail
what details are you putting into the JConsole client instance?
export JAVA_HOME=/opt/java6
echo JAVA_HOME = $JAVA_HOME
export CATALINA_OPTS='-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=8999
On 13/10/2010 12:12, Karthik Nanjangude wrote:
export JAVA_HOME=/opt/java6
echo JAVA_HOME = $JAVA_HOME
export CATALINA_OPTS='-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=8999
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false'
Jconsole of JDK6 = IP:JMX
Hi
through a firewall
As I have already told u in the last mail
1) We do not have a Firewall
2) All our servers are available locally
3) We have several UNIX /LINUX servers
4) From WIN 2000 server JKD6/jconsole I am able to connect to UNIX server
for Monitoring TOMCAT 6.0.14
5) From
On 13/10/2010 14:35, Karthik Nanjangude wrote:
Hi
through a firewall
As I have already told u in the last mail
1) We do not have a Firewall
You said you did.
2) All our servers are available locally
I didn't understand that, apologies.
3) We have several UNIX /LINUX servers
4)
Thanks for the java program Chris, I ran it on the version of the O/S where we
get the problem and got results that show a last modified date that differs by
one hour when the time changes due to DST.
Current GMT time (no DST): 2010-10-12 22:53:27 GMT
Current local time (with DST):
Chris,
I found that reloadable=false does not suppress tomcat from watching
if files change in WEB-INF/lib, even though the docs say it does:
Set to true if you want Catalina to monitor classes in
/WEB-INF/classes/ and /WEB-INF/lib for changes, and automatically reload
the web application if a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ramkumar,
On 10/12/2010 11:43 PM, ramkumar wrote:
Thank you for your response. I dont the communication api version i
think it is 2.0.
They are on 3.0, now.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/index-jsp-141752.html
I searched for latest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 10/12/2010 5:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/10/2010 19:45, Christopher Schultz wrote:
markt marked this bug as FIXED, but I see no indication of a resolution.
Perhaps that was meant to be WONTFIX?
Nope. I meant FIXED. As in There is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anurag,
On 10/12/2010 5:47 PM, Anurag Kapur wrote:
I have probably attached an incomplete snapshot of the memory
utilization graph.
I'm only looking at what is on your blog. That graph looks good. Perhaps
you could update your blog with a graph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jane,
On 10/13/2010 1:40 PM, Jane Muse wrote:
Thanks for the java program Chris, I ran it on the version of the O/S
where we get the problem and got results that show a last modified
date that differs by one hour when the time changes due to DST.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jane,
On 10/13/2010 1:51 PM, Jane Muse wrote:
I found that reloadable=false does not suppress tomcat from watching
if files change in WEB-INF/lib, even though the docs say it does:
Please log a bug. Note that bugs logged against old versions of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whom it may concern,
On 10/12/2010 11:00 AM, efftronics wrote:
I am running apache tomcat 6.0.18 , java 1.6 on windows xp platform.
I copied tcnative-1.dll and openssl.exe(1.1.14 version) in
C:\apache-tomcat-6.0.18\bin . But i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob,
On 10/11/2010 8:43 AM, Rob Gregory wrote:
I call the scripts via code to both stop and start Tomcat. There is a
problem with even calling these scripts via Unix unless you change (cd)
into the bin directory before running startup.sh as the
On 13/10/2010 19:14, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 10/12/2010 5:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/10/2010 19:45, Christopher Schultz wrote:
markt marked this bug as FIXED, but I see no indication of a resolution.
Perhaps that was meant to be WONTFIX?
Nope. I meant FIXED. As in There
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomaz,
On 10/11/2010 4:08 AM, TomazM wrote:
Why if I reload application which use connection pool doesn't release
connection's to MySQL DB?
Only if I restart Tomcat connection's are released, is this a bug.
Yes, it is:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave,
Resurrecting this thread from last week.
On 10/7/2010 2:53 PM, laredotornado wrote:
You are correct. This stack trace came from a server with 6.0.13 installed.
We also observed this in our environment with 6.0.24.
Can you give us the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver,
On 10/10/2010 5:29 AM, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
I'm a bit confused about how differed Java 5 enums are handled in JSPs. I
have
an enum that has an overridden toString() method.
My JSP looks like this:
Output per EL: ${myEnumValue} br/
Here's my context.xml:
Beginning of data**
?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?
!--
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
this work for additional information
From: Jane Muse [mailto:jm...@aldon.com]
Subject: RE: Disable class monitoring for reloading container classes
Here's my context.xml:
!-- WatchedResourceWEB-INF/web.xml/WatchedResource --
That may not be illegal syntax for XML, but it certainly is confusing. Better
to do this:
!--
Chuck,
Thanks for your persistence! I'll try to explain with examples.
We have a directory called COMPANY_NAME/tomcat that is CATALINA_BASE.
I sent the contents of CATALINA_BASE/conf/context.xml in the email
below.
We have a CATALINA_BASE/WEBAPPS/APP_NAME directory.
We also have a
I just realized that I somehow replied to the wrong thread on this one.
It was meant for Jane Muse's thread.
I'll repost there in case someone missed it.
Sorry to interrupt your thread with irrelevant information/spleculation.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Janner
That was me in another thread. Here's what I stated:
It just occurred to me that I don't think anyone's asked if these are
net-mounted file systems. I've seen this timestamp-shifting before, but only
on net-mounted filesystems. Usually the source and local systems are set to
different
The IBM I uses its own integrated file system (IFS). You can access it
locally with map network drives, but my tests did not involve doing
that.
Jane
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 3:20 PM
To: Tomcat Users
Hi all
Thanks for reading this post.
We are currently having 2 requirements that are opposites. The first
requirement is performance under high loads and the other one is equivalent
performance for 1 request.
Our prod env currently uses Apache with mod_jk and ajp 1.3 to Tomcat 6.0.26 and
jdk
From: Vijay Menon [mailto:vijay_me...@hotmail.com]
Subject: Tomcat performance under low load
The other test scenario is where the tomcat instance is kept
idle and a single request is sent in every 90 or so seconds.
In this case, the response takes about 8 seconds out of which
about 6
Hello All,
I am new to this mailing list and want to know about Tomcat Load
Balancing. I have searched a lot but I found only ways to establish a
Tomcat load balancer by using apache HTTP web server as a front end load
balancer. but I want a load balancer in which tomcat master handles all
29 matches
Mail list logo
