Hello,
Are you using tomcat 7 or tomcat 5 ? You mentioned both and this is
confusing.
URL changed in the tomcat 7 manager app : are you accessing through
http://your-host:your-port/manager/html ?
On Jun 29, 2012 3:17 AM, "kl2eativ" wrote:
> Hello. I am having problems trying to authenticate my
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM, kl2eativ wrote:
> Hello. I am having problems trying to authenticate my tomcat 7 manager
> app. I
> keep getting a 401 Unauthorized page. My config is as follows:
> tomcat-users.xml (Located in /etc/tomcat5)
> [code]
>
>
>
>
>
> [/code]
>
> server.xml
> From: THIND Mansukhdeep [mailto:mansukhdeep_th...@3dplmsoftware.com]
> Subject: RE: FW: Tomcat server start up taking excessive time
> What is lack of entropy in dev/random? Please clarify.
GIYF.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//dev/random
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_%28computing%29
If
OK Chris. Next time on I will post to the whole community. I did not understand
the second part of your reply. You have said that " We have seen lack of
entropy in /dev/random
(or equivalent) just blocking: basically, the CPU is just waiting for
data to become available for, say, crypto operation
Hello. I am having problems trying to authenticate my tomcat 7 manager app. I
keep getting a 401 Unauthorized page. My config is as follows:
tomcat-users.xml (Located in /etc/tomcat5)
[code]
[/code]
server.xml (Located in /etc/tomcat5)
[code]
[/code]
I restart the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zoltán,
On 6/28/12 4:08 AM, Komáromi, Zoltán wrote:
> 1. Why not a Realm? Because the authentication depends on session
> attribute, and I want to bypass the form if user is logged in.
>
> So is this correct?
>
>
>
> The tomcat's doc says, that "J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mansukhdeep,
On 6/27/12 11:00 PM, THIND Mansukhdeep wrote:
> You were correct Chris. I found the jar file which was causing the
> issue. It is a kernel specific jar that contains wrapper classes
> for context initialization with the container/applica
On 1:59 PM, Cotton, Joseph B wrote:
A link to the Tomcat documentation:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/appdev/deployment.html#Shared_Li
brary_Files
-Terence Bandoian
Thanks, Terence. Now I have a related question...
This is perhaps more a Java question than a Tomcat question. I hav
On 6/27/2012 8:35 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
100 active db connections sounds like a lot. Do you really need to
support 100 simultaneous connections to your database? Can your
database support that many connections with active queries from each?
Do you have a cluster? Remember that each membe
Martin, generally I would run with fairQueue="false" - this is the default.
The only time I would change to fairQueue="true" is if we see threads being
starved, and not getting connections. However, this scenario is very
unlikely unless there is extreme concurrency going on.
Filip
> -Original
> -Original Message-
> From: cjder...@gmail.com [mailto:cjder...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of chris
> derham
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:47 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Yasser wrote:
>
> > Yes. It do
David kerber wrote:
If I'm not mistaken (which is definitely possible), if you name it
ROOT.war, it will also become the default context.
Quite true. Even a neophyte like me is aware of that. ;-p
(And there's a lot more about Tomcat that I *don't* know, than there is
that I *do* -- it was jus
Hi Filip
Is there an algorithm we can use to determine if the op should configure
concurrent db connections (fairQueue=false) vs config non-concurrent db
connections (fairQueue=true)
e.g. if 50%+ of database cursors are 'read-only' then concurrent connections
*should be used* and TC attribute
On 6/28/2012 3:20 PM, chad.da...@emc.com wrote:
As I read the context docs (
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/context.html ), the only way to
define a default web application is via a context element in the server.xml
file. Is this true? So, this means that it is IMPOSSIBLE to
As I read the context docs (
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/context.html ), the only way to
define a default web application is via a context element in the server.xml
file. Is this true? So, this means that it is IMPOSSIBLE to drop a default
web app WAR into the webapps folde
By default fairQueue is set to true and the value of maxWait is 30 seconds.
I will try increasing the maxwait to 60 seconds and see if that buys tomcat
enough time to return connections to the pool and have it available for the
next connection request. Will let you know.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1
We use Oracle 11.2.0 and it can handle more than 1000 connections.
Here is the stacktrace of the connection pool empty error that I receive in
tomcat logs
Caused by: org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.PoolExhaustedException:
[http-apr-30690-exec-743] Timeout: Pool empty. Unable to fetch a connection
in
Then the issue you may be running into is that your Tomcat configuration
supports a higher concurrency level than what your Resin configuration is
setup to do.
With higher concurrency, there will be a need for more data base
connections. If you still want to run with a lower number of connections,
That was the issue with Tomcat 7.0.26 and they fixed it in 7.0.28
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) <
devli...@hanik.com> wrote:
> Could you have run into
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53367
>
> ?
>
> You could try out
> http://people.apache.org
Could you have run into
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53367
?
You could try out
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/bz53367-jdbc-pool.jar
> -Original Message-
> From: Yasser [mailto:yarafa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:39 AM
> To: Tomcat Us
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Yasser wrote:
> Yes. It does show that maxactive has reached 100. I also use splunk to get
> the connection status at the oracle side.
> What I dont understand is that Resin needs just 50 connections to handle
> the same load. I am in the process of increasing th
Yes. It does show that maxactive has reached 100. I also use splunk to get
the connection status at the oracle side.
What I dont understand is that Resin needs just 50 connections to handle
the same load. I am in the process of increasing the count to 300 and see
if that makes a difference. Oracle
> -Original Message-
> From: Yasser [mailto:yarafa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:44 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
>
...
> What is the issue?
> When we run a stress test on the same codebase deployed to Tomcat 7.0.28,
> at
so the client will need to encrypt the data before the client puts the data on
the wire?
in that case you'll want to take a look at configure both the client
transmitting the secured data and server ACK or responding with encrypted resp
via JSSE
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/
What we are doing?
We are in the process of migrating from Resin 2.0.3 to Tomcat 7.0.28.
The codebase running on Resin when subjected to a stress test (using
resin's connection pool) with maxactive of 50 perform fine. It meets out
non functionality requirements including hits/sec, throughtput, pass
A link to the Tomcat documentation:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/appdev/deployment.html#Shared_Li
brary_Files
-Terence Bandoian
Thanks, Terence. Now I have a related question...
This is perhaps more a Java question than a Tomcat question. I have
copied a jar file into the shared lib
> I think, if I replace the FormAuthenticator with an descendant, it'll
> solve the problem.
>
> To extend FormAuthenticator is simple, but how can I make Tomcat to use it?
I tested this out at one time but it was never placed in production. My
terse notes, which might be leaving something out,
- Original Message -
>
>
> Hi,
>
> was trying the parallel deployment feature:
> - have an app xapp under webapps, running
> - created a new war of xapp, named xapp##001.war
> - placed the under webapps
>
> no xapp#001 folderlogs says:
>
> SEVERE: The war name [xapp##001.war] is in
2012/6/28 Gabriele Bulfon :
> Hi,
>
> was trying the parallel deployment feature:
> - have an app xapp under webapps, running
> - created a new war of xapp, named xapp##001.war
> - placed the under webapps
>
> no xapp#001 folderlogs says:
>
> SEVERE: The war name [xapp##001.war] is invalid. The
On 6/28/2012 9:27 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
-Original Message-
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:25 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Adapting a webapp to use https
We have an application that we've been running successfully for years.
Now o
> -Original Message-
> From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:25 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Adapting a webapp to use https
>
> We have an application that we've been running successfully for years.
> Now one of our potential customers
Hi,
was trying the parallel deployment feature:
- have an app xapp under webapps, running
- created a new war of xapp, named xapp##001.war
- placed the under webapps
no xapp#001 folderlogs says:
SEVERE: The war name [xapp##001.war] is invalid. The archive will be ignored.
any idea?
Gabriele.
-
We have an application that we've been running successfully for years.
Now one of our potential customers wants to investigate possibly
switching it to use https instead of http, and I'm trying to figure out
what's involved in the conversion.
The clients are headless industrial computers that
2012/6/28 Neena Damodaran :
> Classification: For internal use only
If it is "for internal use", do not post it to a publicly archived mailing list.
The same for your "disclaimer" below.
>
> We have issues with logging with one of our customers in production.
> We have log4J configured in our ap
>
>
> Good Evening Pavel Implementing a SSL Connector on Tomcat will prevent
> Session Fixation attack
>
Martin,
This is not correct. Using SSL will not stop session fixation attacks
Chris
Classification: For internal use only
Hi,
We have issues with logging with one of our customers in production.
We have log4J configured in our application.
But for this one customer the logs that are written to Application.log is
also
going to STDOUT.log and because of this STDOUT.log is gro
The problem was with jk2.shm file. In any case I installed the latest
iaspi_redirect and got it working to some extent. the login goes to the
ROOT/index.jsp rather than my webapp's index.jsp.
uriworkermap.properties is
/AtYourService/*.jsp=worker1
/AtYourService/servlet/*=worker1
workers.prop
2012/6/28 Komáromi, Zoltán :
> 1. Why not a Realm?
> Because the authentication depends on session attribute, and I want to
> bypass the form if user is logged in.
When I used Tomcat's realm to authenticate users , that was a issue
than I missed : to access to session enviroment or context envirom
1. Why not a Realm?
Because the authentication depends on session attribute, and I want to
bypass the form if user is logged in.
So is this correct?
The tomcat's doc says, that "Java class name of the implementation to
use. This MUST be set to
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.FormAuthenticator
2012/6/28 Komáromi, Zoltán :
> Hi,
>
> I need to use custom authenticator, because a part of application is
> using container authentication, and unfortunately the usersernames in
> realm conflicts with usernames in application database. :(
>
> So I need, that if anibody is logged in to my applicat
40 matches
Mail list logo
