Thank you Rainer,
Now Apache is working with disable mode. Maybe later it changed again.
:)
2011/6/12 Rainer Jung
> On 12.06.2011 09:30, Manuel Fernández Panzuela wrote:
> > Is possible to combine both attributes distance - activation ?
> > Distance looks like a very interesting attribute.
>
>
On 12.06.2011 09:30, Manuel Fernández Panzuela wrote:
> Is possible to combine both attributes distance - activation ?
> Distance looks like a very interesting attribute.
Yes, of course you can combine. As long as you don't cnfuse yourself
because it gets too complicated.
Distace (e.g. 0 and 1) w
Is possible to combine both attributes distance - activation ?
Distance looks like a very interesting attribute.
Regards
2011/6/11 Rainer Jung
> On 08.06.2011 12:12, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández
> > Panzuela:
> >> Yes Felix, you
On 08.06.2011 12:12, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández
> Panzuela:
>> Yes Felix, you are right i am working with 2 instances.
>> I want primary node receives all requests and on failure send requests to
>> the secondary node.
>> Is it possib
Woowww Now, mod_jk is working perfectly
Thank you so much FELIX !!!
Best regards
2011/6/8 Felix Schumacher
> Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández
> Panzuela:
> > Yes Felix, you are right i am working with 2 instances.
> > I want primary node receives all requests
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández
Panzuela:
> Yes Felix, you are right i am working with 2 instances.
> I want primary node receives all requests and on failure send requests to
> the secondary node.
> Is it possible with your recomendation ?
You may also want to rea
Yes Felix, you are right i am working with 2 instances.
I want primary node receives all requests and on failure send requests to
the secondary node.
Is it possible with your recomendation ?
worker.43m2g1.activation=d
degraded ??? is a condition ? then all requests will be redirected to 43m2g1
??
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 08:41 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández
Panzuela:
> my setup:
>
> # Define list of workers that will be used for mapping requests
> worker.list=loadbalancer43,status
>
> # Definicion de plantilla
> worker.template43.port=8009
> worker.template43.type=ajp13
> worker.templ
my setup:
# Define list of workers that will be used for mapping requests
worker.list=loadbalancer43,status
# Definicion de plantilla
worker.template43.port=8009
worker.template43.type=ajp13
worker.template43.lbfactor=1
worker.template43.ping_timeout=1000
worker.template43.socket_timeout=10
worke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manuel.
On 6/7/2011 12:38 PM, Manuel Fernández Panzuela wrote:
> I want to work with mod_jk in failover mode. I do not want to balancing
> petitions until the node 1 is unavailable. If principal node (node 1) is
> down, then petitions will be redirect
Hello,
I want to work with mod_jk in failover mode. I do not want to balancing
petitions until the node 1 is unavailable. If principal node (node 1) is
down, then petitions will be redirected to node 2.
How I can do it?
Thank you
11 matches
Mail list logo
