rect?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 10:26 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Windows x64 Installer
Jeffrey Janner wrote:
> Did the double-check.
> IPv6 protocol is disabled on the active network connection.
> So it s
Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 10:19 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
>
> IPv6 protocol i
Jeffrey Janner wrote:
Did the double-check.
IPv6 protocol is disabled on the active network connection.
So it shouldn't be an IPv6 issue.
It should be disabled on all connections including localhost.
NULL address means 'all interfaces'.
Regards
--
^(TM)
--
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
>
> IPv6 protocol is disabled on the active network connection.
> So it shouldn't be an IPv6 issue.
But it clearly is, since your netstat output shows IPv6 addresses, not IP
o: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
>
> Now the reason why 4) below was not working (all 64-bit), is that I
> didn't have an address specified in my tag. Apparen
Users List
Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
>
> Now the reason why 4) below was not working (all 64-bit), is that I
> didn't have an address specified in my tag. Apparently,
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
>
> Now the reason why 4) below was not working (all 64-bit), is that I
> didn't have an address specified in my tag. Apparently, at
> all windows revs prior to 2008 server,
János Löbb wrote:
On May 29, 2009, at 7:15 PM, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
János Löbb:
Because the electron has resting mess, it will never go with speed of
light. The info by the way is not supplied by the electron, but
rather with electromagnetic waves around the wire who have no resting
mes
ey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 9:03 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
Oops, on 3) I should have said I was using the APR, but for HTTP only,
not HTTPS.
I was thinking AJP for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeff
On May 29, 2009, at 7:15 PM, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
János Löbb:
Because the electron has resting mess, it will never go with speed of
light. The info by the way is not supplied by the electron, but
rather with electromagnetic waves around the wire who have no resting
mess,
Oh, what a mes
Oops, on 3) I should have said I was using the APR, but for HTTP only,
not HTTPS.
I was thinking AJP for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:53 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
János Löbb:
> Because the electron has resting mess, it will never go with speed of
> light. The info by the way is not supplied by the electron, but
> rather with electromagnetic waves around the wire who have no resting
> mess,
Oh, what a mess!
;-)
--
Regards
mks
---
aldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
>
> Tested all those options before I sent the mail.
Let me summarize to se
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
>
> Tested all those options before I sent the mail.
Let me summarize to see if I understand this properly:
1) 32-bit JVM, 32-bit DLL: works from localhost and from a separate system
2
dware (loopback would be higher in the software layer).
-Original Message-
From: will trillich [mailto:trill...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Windows x64 Installer
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>>
On May 28, 2009, at 5:36 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: Windows x64 Installer
You've beet me by a millisecond ;)
Yeah, but that's 300 km for an electron...
And please note that from the electron'
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> I installed them on Windows 2008 x64, and could not get a
>> response from Tomcat, if coming from the net. The local
>> browser would pull it up just fine.
>
> Tomcat (with or without APR) doesn't care if the request
> came via loopb
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
>
> They may need some work.
> I installed them on Windows 2008 x64, and could not get a
> response from Tomcat, if coming from the net. The local
> browser would pull it up jus
: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Windows x64 Installer
I need to check how the APR/native library is handled. That may still
need some work.
*** NOTICE *
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: Windows x64 Installer
You've beet me by a millisecond ;)
Yeah, but that's 300 km for an electron...
And please note that from the electron's point of view, it may be a lot
less tha
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
> Subject: Re: Windows x64 Installer
>
> You've beet me by a millisecond ;)
Yeah, but that's 300 km for an electron...
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is th
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Debbie Shapiro [mailto:dshap...@cardiacscience.com]
Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
I just did the 64-bit windows installation for Tomcat 6, but I was not
aware that there is a tcnative-1.dll that needed to be replaced. Where
do I find the 64-bit version of
Debbie Shapiro wrote:
I just did the 64-bit windows installation for Tomcat 6, but I was not
aware that there is a tcnative-1.dll that needed to be replaced. Where
do I find the 64-bit version of this file? Or is that just for Tomcat 5?
The regular place. tcnative-1 is the same for all Tomcat v
> From: Debbie Shapiro [mailto:dshap...@cardiacscience.com]
> Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
>
> I just did the 64-bit windows installation for Tomcat 6, but I was not
> aware that there is a tcnative-1.dll that needed to be replaced. Where
> do I find the 64-bit version o
re it.
-Original Message-
From: Debbie Shapiro [mailto:dshap...@cardiacscience.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:32 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Windows x64 Installer
I just did the 64-bit windows installation for Tomcat 6, but I was not
aware that there is a tcnative-1.dll
s all new to me.
Debbie Shapiro, Data Warehouse Manager
Office: 425.402.2233
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 1:44 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Windows x64 Installer
Would anyone like to tackle &
4:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Windows x64 Installer
If we skip the tcnative DLL, are we missing anything significant?
We're getting along without it for now...
*** NOTICE *
This message is intended for the use of th
Jeffrey Janner wrote:
Would anyone like to tackle & post an installer for 64-bit Windows?
The current installer is 32-bit only.
I know that it is fairly simple to convert an installed 32-bit Tomcat to
64-bit:
4) Run the Tomcat5.exe in Install mode to install the 64-bit version,
making sure to po
Jeffrey Janner wrote:
> Thanks Mark.
> One more reason to hound my developers to move up.
> Any reason that an app written for 5.5 could not be moved wholesale to
> 6.x?
> Also, did I leave out anything in my manual steps?
Looks good to me.
I need to check how the APR/native library is handled. T
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Jeffrey Janner
wrote:
> Would anyone like to tackle & post an installer for 64-bit Windows?
> The current installer is 32-bit only.
Hi Jeff --
We just got done tackling a 64-bit windows install, and we're writing
up a more complete doc, but have a look at this pr
Thanks Mark.
One more reason to hound my developers to move up.
Any reason that an app written for 5.5 could not be moved wholesale to
6.x?
Also, did I leave out anything in my manual steps?
JEff
Mark Thomas wrote:
Already done and will be in 6.0.21 onwards. (didn't quite make 6.0.20)
Mark
--
Jeffrey Janner wrote:
> Would anyone like to tackle & post an installer for 64-bit Windows?
> The current installer is 32-bit only.
Already done and will be in 6.0.21 onwards. (didn't quite make 6.0.20)
Mark
-
To unsubscribe,
Would anyone like to tackle & post an installer for 64-bit Windows?
The current installer is 32-bit only.
I know that it is fairly simple to convert an installed 32-bit Tomcat to
64-bit:
1) Install a 64-bit Java.
2) Download the 64-bit Procrun executable and replace Tomcat5.exe &
Tomcat5w.exe with
33 matches
Mail list logo
