On 17/02/2024 21:42, Dan McLaughlin wrote:
We've had the same LDAP realm configured for probably 10 years, and the
same roles in our LDAP for probably the same. We have 4 roles configured
in LDAP manager-gui, manager-jmx, manager-script, and manager-status. My
user only has the manager-gui
with
it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is strictly prohibited. The contents of this
e-mail are confidential and may be subject to work product privileges. If
you are not the intended
We are using 9.0.12 on a server and noticed a pretty big memory leak. The
change log mentions a some fixed leaks in the releases since 9.0.12.
I was wondering if this leak was fixed already.
The leak is that there are over 80,000 instances of
org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.MessageBytes. Below
Am 08.05.2019 um 10:14 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 07/05/2019 13:37, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
Hi.
On 26.04.2019 18:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/04/2019 10:58, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
Hi.
This is somewhat of an arcane question and somewhat straddling httpd and
tomcat, so if I'm on the
On 07/05/2019 13:37, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 26.04.2019 18:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 24/04/2019 10:58, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> This is somewhat of an arcane question and somewhat straddling httpd and
>>> tomcat, so if I'm on the wrong list for this,
Hi.
On 26.04.2019 18:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/04/2019 10:58, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
Hi.
This is somewhat of an arcane question and somewhat straddling httpd and
tomcat, so if I'm on the wrong list for this, just let me know.
Here is fine. We can always move the thread if
On 24/04/2019 10:58, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is somewhat of an arcane question and somewhat straddling httpd and
> tomcat, so if I'm on the wrong list for this, just let me know.
Here is fine. We can always move the thread if necessary.
> The question is : is there any
Hi.
This is somewhat of an arcane question and somewhat straddling httpd and tomcat, so if I'm
on the wrong list for this, just let me know.
The question is : is there any particular reason why the combination mod_proxy +
mod_proxy_ajp (in httpd), does not seem to follow the
On 03/05/18 15:47, R Mundell wrote:
> I don’t believe it’s actually possible for the filters or the servlet to
> remove headers even if they want to (they don’t appear to have any access to
> the MimeHeaders of the Coyote “Response” object, and the HttpServletResponse
> object doesn’t have
Attention Tomcat developers who know how the Coyote bit of Tomcat works… I’ve
got a tricky one for you! :-)
We’re struggling with a puzzling problem where intermittently, calls to a
servlet are delivered back to the client with all of the headers missing except
the ones that Coyote adds.
In
; "scalabilitaly is equal" to a tomcat with 200 max threads but with
>>> servlet 3's async API including application's thread pool with size 200.
>>>
>>> However so far I thought Oracle's docs are like standards and tomcat
>>> have to satisfy them :)
&g
On 9/13/2017 9:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 05/09/2017 19:56, Yasser Zamani wrote:
>> Thanks a lot Mark!
>>
>> Yes I knew these and before tested that a tomcat with 400 max threads
>> "scalabilitaly is equal" to a tomcat with 200 max threads but wi
On 05/09/2017 19:56, Yasser Zamani wrote:
> Thanks a lot Mark!
>
> Yes I knew these and before tested that a tomcat with 400 max threads
> "scalabilitaly is equal" to a tomcat with 200 max threads but with
> servlet 3's async API including application's thread pool wi
On 9/5/2017 11:26 PM, Yasser Zamani wrote:
> Thanks a lot Mark!
>
> Yes I knew these and before tested that a tomcat with 400 max threads
> "scalabilitaly is equal" to a tomcat with 200 max threads but with
> servlet 3's async API including application's
Thanks a lot Mark!
Yes I knew these and before tested that a tomcat with 400 max threads
"scalabilitaly is equal" to a tomcat with 200 max threads but with
servlet 3's async API including application's thread pool with size 200.
However so far I thought Oracle's docs are like
at must use another thread pool for such blocking operations
> and keep current thread pool free for new requests; It's the philosophy
> of Servlet 3.0's asynchronous support according to Oracle's
> documentation. wdyt?
I think this is a good question that highlights a lot of
misunderstanding in t
es not make thread pool more free to process new
requests, but also has an overhead via thread switching!
I think Tomcat must use another thread pool for such blocking operations
and keep current thread pool free for new requests; It's the philosophy
of Servlet 3.0's asynchronous support according
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 5/2/16 7:29 AM, David kerber wrote:
> On 5/2/2016 3:33 AM, Kapilan A wrote:
>> Hi Folks
>>
>> I am facing one issue with Apache Tomcat 8.
>>
>>
>>
>> In 32 GB machine, four instances of tomcat is running and every
>> tomcat has memory
On 5/2/2016 3:33 AM, Kapilan A wrote:
Hi Folks
I am facing one issue with Apache Tomcat 8.
In 32 GB machine, four instances of tomcat is running and every tomcat has
memory as 512-1024.
In the SQl server, a particular table called "MetaData".
Third party engine will
On 02/05/2016 08:33, Kapilan A wrote:
> I am facing one issue with Apache Tomcat 8.
Which version?
> After 12 hours continuously posting, then one of the tomcat is freeze. Its
> not accepting any more connections from third party
What do the logs show?
What about a thread dump? Ideally, you
Hi Folks
I am facing one issue with Apache Tomcat 8.
In 32 GB machine, four instances of tomcat is running and every tomcat has
memory as 512-1024.
In the SQl server, a particular table called "MetaData".
Third party engine will post a http request
and the server is almost not
accessible. When I open the server:8080/manager of that server, I found
that all the Stages under http-nio-8080 are S! The values of BSent
and BRecv are all 0 KB. What does that mean? To solve this problem, the
only way I know is to restart Tomcat, but after several days
of threads.
When I open the server:8080/manager of that server, I found that
all the Stages under http-nio-8080 are S! The values of
BSent and BRecv are all 0 KB. What does that mean?
Those are metrics I don't recognize. Are these stats kept and shown by
the load balancer?
To solve
On 19/01/2015 18:43, manish.m.pa...@kp.org wrote:
Hello Users:
Issue:
while copying file from windows 7 to network share folder (in webapp using
webDav servlet) it throws error message on local machine
Error 0x80070032: The request is not supported
We were NOT having this issue when we
Hello Users:
Issue:
while copying file from windows 7 to network share folder (in webapp using
webDav servlet) it throws error message on local machine
Error 0x80070032: The request is not supported
We were NOT having this issue when we were using windows XP.
We are working with microsoft on
Here is my env:
Server version: Apache Tomcat/7.0.47
Server built: Oct 18 2013 01:07:38
Server number: 7.0.47.0
OS Name:Linux
OS Version: 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64
Architecture: amd64
JVM Version:1.6.0_20-b02
JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
The problem:
my application
?? wrote:
Here is my env:
Server version: Apache Tomcat/7.0.47
Server built: Oct 18 2013 01:07:38
Server number: 7.0.47.0
OS Name:Linux
OS Version: 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64
Architecture: amd64
JVM Version:1.6.0_20-b02
JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
The problem:
my
Sorry,I made a mistake, the ROOT should be upper case.
At 2014-09-30 17:13:40, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
罗茂林 wrote:
Here is my env:
Server version: Apache Tomcat/7.0.47
Server built: Oct 18 2013 01:07:38
Server number: 7.0.47.0
OS Name:Linux
OS Version:
2014-09-30 11:53 GMT+04:00 罗茂林 a8156...@126.com:
Here is my env:
Server version: Apache Tomcat/7.0.47
Server built: Oct 18 2013 01:07:38
Server number: 7.0.47.0
OS Name:Linux
OS Version: 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64
Architecture: amd64
JVM Version:1.6.0_20-b02
JVM Vendor:
Thanks for replying,I answered after you questions.
At 2014-09-30 17:25:53, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-09-30 11:53 GMT+04:00 罗茂林 a8156...@126.com:
Here is my env:
Server version: Apache Tomcat/7.0.47
Server built: Oct 18 2013 01:07:38
Server number: 7.0.47.0
OS
and I just tried to add the user session id to the access log by
adding %S to the pattern attribute. However, it's not working. All I'm
getting is - in the log.
Have to ask, but are you sure that the request has an active session?
Usually when you see - it means the value is absent
, Fred Toth ft...@synernet.com wrote:
Hi,
This feature is in the doc since at least tomcat 5. I'm using tomcat
7.0.47 and I just tried to add the user session id to the access log by
adding %S to the pattern attribute. However, it's not working. All I'm
getting is - in the log.
Have to ask
On 09/06/2014 10:59, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/06/2014 01:41, Fred Toth wrote:
Hi Dan,
Yes, the rest of the log is correct, and yes, I am certain I have an
active session (I can see the cookie in my browser).
Then something is messed up in your configuration. I've just
Hi again,
I'm confused. I thought (apparently mistakenly) that there was always a
session, but I must be wrong.
I just downloaded a fresh instance of 7.0.54 and added the %S to the
valve config. However, I don't get any session keys in the log when I
click around in the doc. But, as soon
also exist completely independently of authentication.
I just downloaded a fresh instance of 7.0.54 and added the %S to
the valve config. However, I don't get any session keys in the log
when I click around in the doc. But, as soon as I click on the
manager or status links, I get the key.
Before
-
and DIGEST-based authentication, a session is not necessary at all,
though common.
Sessions can also exist completely independently of authentication.
I just downloaded a fresh instance of 7.0.54 and added the %S to
the valve config. However, I don't get any session keys in the log
when I click
Hi,
This feature is in the doc since at least tomcat 5. I'm using tomcat
7.0.47 and I just tried to add the user session id to the access log by
adding %S to the pattern attribute. However, it's not working. All I'm
getting is - in the log.
Is there some trick to this? I haven't found
On Jun 8, 2014 4:01 PM, Fred Toth ft...@synernet.com wrote:
Hi,
This feature is in the doc since at least tomcat 5. I'm using tomcat
7.0.47 and I just tried to add the user session id to the access log by
adding %S to the pattern attribute. However, it's not working. All I'm
getting
at least tomcat 5. I'm using tomcat
7.0.47 and I just tried to add the user session id to the access log by
adding %S to the pattern attribute. However, it's not working. All I'm
getting is - in the log.
Have to ask, but are you sure that the request has an active session?
Usually when you see - it means
.
On 2/20/14, 12:21 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 20/02/2014 07:46, mark_desp...@mcafee.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
My project recently tried upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.52 and has become
bit by the renaming of jasper2¹s ³validateXml² to ³validateTld², as
described on the thread below
by the renaming of jasper2¹s ³validateXml² to ³validateTld², as
described on the thread below. This change has made it more
difficult pick up the latest Tomcat 7¹s security fixes since the
change breaks build scripts for quite a few projects maintained by
different teams.
Would it be possible
On 20/02/2014 07:46, mark_desp...@mcafee.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
My project recently tried upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.52 and has become
bit by the renaming of jasper2’s “validateXml” to “validateTld”, as
described on the thread below. This change has made it more
difficult pick up the latest
/20/14, 12:21 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 20/02/2014 07:46, mark_desp...@mcafee.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
My project recently tried upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.52 and has become
bit by the renaming of jasper2¹s ³validateXml² to ³validateTld², as
described on the thread below
Hi everyone,
My project recently tried upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.52 and has become bit by the
renaming of jasper2’s “validateXml” to “validateTld”, as described on the
thread below. This change has made it more difficult pick up the latest Tomcat
7’s security fixes since the change breaks build
Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioBlockingSelector.write(NioBlockingSelector.java:127)
at
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:41 AM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioBlockingSelector.write(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 11/10/13, 9:25 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 11/11/13, 5:41 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException at
know the culprit(s); see details/explanation, below.
Maybe Igor is right and the problem is some browser (e.g. MSIE 8) and not
necessarily mobile clients.
it is the mobile device phone/internet connection that is lost, recycled,
recovered (or however you want to explain it). see below
Using Tomcat 7.0.47 via TomEE 1.6.0 along with MyFaces 2.1.13
Recently, I have been experiencing the SocketTimeoutException when web
application is serving resources to 'mobile clients'. Yesterday, user was
attempting to login from mobile iPad via an internal wireless phone
connection. Since my
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioBlockingSelector.write(NioBlockingSelector.java:127)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioSelectorPool.write(NioSelectorPool.java:174)
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException
at
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote:
In my experience SocketTimeoutException comes up in case of misbehaving
browser (read IE 8 and older), i.e. the client fails to send the complete
request and the socket timeout strikes.
interesting, thanks. This error
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote:
For Sun Java for example you can try the following:
-Dsun.net.client.defaultReadTimeout=180
which will increase the socket timeout to 30 minutes lets say if the
default one is not enough in case or slow client.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote:
For Sun Java for example you can try the following:
-Dsun.net.client.defaultReadTimeout=180
which will increase the socket
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote:
Also you didn't say anything about any load balancer or proxy fronting your
application. It is worth checking the timeouts there as well and align them
with the
connection timeout on your server (in case you do use one
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote:
There is heaps of articles and questions in various forums
you're right... i searched google for ClientAbortException in tomcat nabble
archive, and saw many posts.
It appears that there is a problem in Tomcat's static UpgradeUtil.doUpgrade
logic when handling concurrent connection/upgrade requests that rely on a
custom ServerEndpointConfig.Configurator.modifyHandshake to grab
[per-upgrade-request] client header values and inject them into the wsSession
Hi,
Awhile ago, I had this thread, where I originally trying to see if I could get
Tomcat, using the AJP connector and tomcatAuthentication to work, when I had
an OAM webgate installed on the Apache proxy fronting the Tomcat:
Hello Rainer,
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 7:48 PM
I don't really know, but 1220 is ERROR_CONNECTION_INVALID, which is
closer to what you expected. One of the parameters passed to
WriteClient
and also in the
Hi all,
I'm using Tomcat 7.0.25 (running on a Oracle JDK 1.7.0_03) on a Windows Server
2008 (32-Bit), with IIS 7.0 and the ISAPI 1.2.32 connector (with chunked
encoding enabled) to pass HTTP requests to Tomcat.
Since IIS 7.0, there is a response buffering that also applies to responses
from
On 20.02.2012 18:45, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using Tomcat 7.0.25 (running on a Oracle JDK 1.7.0_03) on a Windows Server
2008 (32-Bit), with IIS 7.0 and the ISAPI 1.2.32 connector (with chunked
encoding enabled) to pass HTTP requests to Tomcat.
Since IIS 7.0, there is a
:
From: Kobe [mailto:r...@mailcity.com]
Subject: Re: s
I changed the paths to standard locations (using
LD_LIBRARY_PATH).
So where is your .so file actually located? You need to include that
directory in LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL
connectionTimeout=11000
redirectPort=443
/
same for https also.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/s-tp32723372p32723372.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
I see java.library.path is set to /opt/asdasdasd/app/bin/../lib,
which looks a little funky. Have you tried setting it to
/opt/asdasdasd/app/lib? I'm assuming this is the location of the
compiled library files, please confirm.
Dan
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 04:30 -0700, Kobe wrote:
i have tomcat6
config is
Connector port=8080
protocol=org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol
connectionTimeout=11000
redirectPort=443
/
same for https also.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/s-tp32723372p32725391.html
redirectPort=443
/
same for https also.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/s-tp32723372p32725411.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
From: Kobe [mailto:r...@mailcity.com]
Subject: Re: s
I changed the paths to standard locations (using
LD_LIBRARY_PATH).
So where is your .so file actually located? You need to include that directory
in LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL
From: Kobe [mailto:r...@mailcity.com]
Subject: Re: s
Is it possible to make it say what library it missing?
It's missing the one you built. (You did build the APR .so file, didn't you?)
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL
On 14/09/2011 16:38, Darius D. wrote:
p
Well the problem is that we already looked for that mode of failure, our
servlet class has 0 instance variables... Basically it is a method like i
pasted before, doing HttpSession session = request.getSession(); and if
session is valid (it is!)
=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve
directory=logs
prefix=localhost_access_log. suffix=.txt
pattern=%h %l %u %t quot;%rquot; %s %b
resolveHosts=false/
/Host
/Engine
/Service
/Server
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Request-params-randomly-null-in-servlet%28s%29
protocolHeader=X-Forwarded-Proto /
Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve
directory=logs
prefix=localhost_access_log. suffix=.txt
pattern=%h %l %u %t quot;%rquot; %s %b
resolveHosts=false/
/Host
/Engine
/Service
/Server
Pid * wrote:
Exactly which version of Tomcat are you running?
Latest, 7.0.21.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Request-params-randomly-null-in-servlet%28s%29-tp32461421p32474158.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
we have a problem of request params beeing null in servlets where it
shouldn't be ( post or get, in get we can even see that
request.getQueryString() is fine, but params are null).
It is more pronounced when using dedicated thread executor, moving to
threads provided by connector itself
with type and v params like it
gets and processes thousands others.
Servlet code looks like:
doProcess(req, res) is not a Servlet API method. What other method(s)
call it?
private void doProcess(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
response) throws IOException
Pid * wrote:
doProcess(req, res) is not a Servlet API method. What other method(s)
call it?
Usually this type of thing occurs because the request (or response) is
being held as an instance field somewhere in a thread-unsafe way.
It is called from:
public void doGet
On 14/09/2011 11:55, Darius D. wrote:
Pid * wrote:
doProcess(req, res) is not a Servlet API method. What other method(s)
call it?
Usually this type of thing occurs because the request (or response) is
being held as an instance field somewhere in a thread-unsafe way.
It is called
Pid * wrote:
On 14/09/2011 11:55, Darius D. wrote:
They are in *that* thread.
It is possible to expose either request or response object outside of
the scope of the thread, so a second request sees a modified version of
the same object.
E.g.
public class SomeServlet extends
I am trying to write a web app to do authentication through google. My
development environment is eclipse with the google GAE and jetty. I get no
compile time errors--and I copied the web module folder (named *war* in
eclipse) manually into webapps in tomcat. No .war file involved. The app runs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael,
On 5/6/2011 10:26 AM, Jay, Michael wrote:
This package is in the .jar. User is a class in the package.
createLoginURL() is a method in the UserServiceFactory class, also in
the package. And yet, live in tomcat . . .
error:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote:
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Followup on 32-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
I'm sorry, I probably missed something, but why should 64 bit app on
64
On 15 March 2011 07:36, Leon Rosenberg rosenberg.l...@gmail.com wrote:
So a 64bit cpu has a 32bit mode, or how would a 32bit OS shrink the
transmit size? I mean the registers stay the same?
Frequently, the bottleneck with realistic loads is access to main memory
(or, not quite equivalently,
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] Followup on 32-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
A 32-bit process, using 32-bit pointers, will enjoy a 2x speedup for
those types of data.
Also, a Java int, when allocated on the stack, must take up
On 15 March 2011 13:02, Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.comwrote:
Also, a Java int, when allocated on the stack, must take up the same number
of bits as a pointer.
That's an interesting space/time trade-off (I presume it's to prevent
excess arithmetic on stack value accesses). I
From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com]
On Behalf Of Peter Crowther
Subject: Re: [OT] Followup on 32-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
Also, a Java int, when allocated on the stack, must take up the same number
of bits as a pointer.
That's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 3/15/2011 9:02 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] Followup on 32-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
A 32-bit process, using 32-bit pointers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 3/14/2011 11:20 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Followup on 32-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
I'm sorry, I probably missed something, but why should
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] Followup on 32-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
So, back to the original question: will a 32-bit JVM on a 64-bit OS give
me a bigger heap potential than a 32-bit JVM on a 32-bit OS?
Depends entirely
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] Followup on 32-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
A Java int is defined to be 32-bits. Why would it have to be word-length
on the stack? Is that documented anywhere, or does it just end up being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I've been thinking about the recent discussion(s) about 32-bit versus
64-bit performance on 64-bit hardware and I have a simple question:
what's the best deployment strategy for a Java webapp that doesn't
require *huge* amounts of memory, yet
On 3/14/2011 1:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
We are going into a production upgrade cycle and I'd like to plan for
the OS type: if we get no benefit from running a 64-bit OS then I won't
bother installing one.
If you're using windows server machines, Server 2008 R2 (and maybe
Server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 3/14/2011 1:22 PM, David kerber wrote:
On 3/14/2011 1:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
We are going into a production upgrade cycle and I'd like to plan for
the OS type: if we get no benefit from running a 64-bit OS then I
On 3/14/2011 1:31 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 3/14/2011 1:22 PM, David kerber wrote:
On 3/14/2011 1:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
We are going into a production upgrade cycle and I'd like to plan for
the OS type: if we get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 3/14/2011 1:36 PM, David kerber wrote:
On 3/14/2011 1:31 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I should have mentioned, we are in a Linux environment, so we have lots
of options. ;)
Lucky you; I wish I could say the same...
You should
I'm sorry, I probably missed something, but why should 64 bit app on
64 bit os on 64 bit cpu be slower as 32 bit analog?
regards
Leon
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 3/14/2011
To: Tomcat Users Listusers@tomcat.apache.org
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Followup on 32-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
I'm sorry, I probably missed something, but why should 64 bit app on
64 bit os on 64 bit cpu be slower as 32 bit analog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin,
On 3/14/2011 3:45 PM, Justin Randall wrote:
In general, it is technically possible for a 32-bit application to
perform faster than a 64-bit application when running on a 64-bit CPU
because of CPU memory cache behaviour.
Also due to the
-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
Sent: Mar 14, 2011 17:08
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin,
On 3/14/2011 3:45 PM, Justin Randall wrote:
In general, it is technically possible for a 32-bit application to
perform faster than a 64-bit application when running on a 64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin,
On 3/14/2011 5:44 PM, Justin Randall wrote:
It really makes you wonder why caches and pipelines weren't scaled more
proportionally.
Not to mention memory sizes in general. We got a 2^32-fold increase in
addressable memory. Great. Where is
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Followup on 32-bit versus 64-bit performance discussion(s)
I'm sorry, I probably missed something, but why should 64 bit app on
64 bit os on 64 bit cpu be slower as 32 bit analog?
Because all the data items are bigger
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
