If I understand correctly I think you are trying to share state between
multiple apps in the same runtime. I've always found JMX meets this criteria
nicely.
Andy.
-
--
Andy Gumbrecht
http://www.tomitribe.com
agumbre...@tomitribe.com
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
T
Le 10 oct. 2017 15:14, "Paul Carter-Brown"
a écrit :
Hi Romain,
mmm this really throws a spanner in the works.
So let's say I have an EAR with many WARs and I have a jar which provides
shared functionality to the WARs. In the jar are classes that are expensive
to initialise and consume a lot of
you could consider using a rest interface to get shared data across
webapps? i generally deploy the lib per webapp where i have a shared
lib. the data can be loaded from a single shared rest interface.
On 10/10/2017 16:13, Paul Carter-Brown wrote:
Hi Romain,
mmm this really throws a spanner
Hi Romain,
mmm this really throws a spanner in the works.
So let's say I have an EAR with many WARs and I have a jar which provides
shared functionality to the WARs. In the jar are classes that are expensive
to initialise and consume a lot of memory.
I hoped that putting the jar in EAR/lib and s
Le 10 oct. 2017 14:26, "Paul Carter-Brown"
a écrit :
Hi,
I've used @ApplicationScoped and @javax.inject.Singleton and both have the
same behaviour. Seems like webbeans considers both to be Singleton as they
are stored in the singleton context.
Yes, was just a side note for other behaviors.
Hi,
I've used @ApplicationScoped and @javax.inject.Singleton and both have the
same behaviour. Seems like webbeans considers both to be Singleton as they
are stored in the singleton context.
In terms of the behaviour of these in an EAR:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129
Doing more researc
But with skinny wars you still get it in the webapp loader and lib part
right ? It is not about physical model but resolved one.
Le 10 oct. 2017 14:11, "Paul Carter-Brown"
a écrit :
Hi Romain,
Correct me if I'm wrong but my understanding is that an EAR with shared
library jars should be conside
Hi Romain,
Correct me if I'm wrong but my understanding is that an EAR with shared
library jars should be considered as a single application. If a class
exists in a single jar and a single classloader and is marked as a
singleton then is it wrong to expect it to only be constructed once by CDI?
I
That is what I had in mind and it matches the classloader model of skinny
wars I think so it looks like it works as intended - as thought I mean.
Side note: you surely meant @ApplicationScoped more than singleton.
Le 10 oct. 2017 13:44, "Paul Carter-Brown"
a écrit :
> Hi Romain,
>
> As a non-s
Hi Romain,
As a non-static it is different on each call. The singleton is being
constructed twice within the same classloader.
I did some more digging and debugging and can see that 2 singleton contexts
are being created in CDI by two different initialisation flows that both
end up at org.apache.
And removing the static?
Le 10 oct. 2017 11:45, "Paul Carter-Brown" <
paul.carter-br...@opposablethumbs.io> a écrit :
> Hi Andy/Romain,
>
> I'll load on github today and create a ticket.
>
> I have verified that it is a single instance by having a static
> initializer: private static final String
Hi Andy/Romain,
I'll load on github today and create a ticket.
I have verified that it is a single instance by having a static
initializer: private static final String uuid =
UUID.randomUUID().toString();
The uuid remains the same on both calls to the postconstruct method
Paul
On Tue, Oct 10,
Hi,
The use of plain CDI is intentional in this case. I don't need an EJB.
Interestingly enough I did a test by changing the singleton to a
javax.ejb.Singleton
and using "@EJB" in the servlet. With the EJB packaged with "skinny war"
the injection failed with an NPR when trying to use the EJB:
2017
PS,
are U sure you wanna use javax.inject.Singleton?
Maybe javax.ejb.Singleton?
/hw
ti., 10.10.2017 kl. 08.34 +0200, skrev Paul Carter-Brown:
> Hi,
>
> Loaded on github and created ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2134
>
> On 10 October 2017 at 07:56, Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi,
Loaded on github and created ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2134
On 10 October 2017 at 07:56, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Did you check the instance - identity hashcode for instance? I wonder if it
> is not 2 instances triggered on the same event.
>
> Othe
Hi Paul,
Did you check the instance - identity hashcode for instance? I wonder if it
is not 2 instances triggered on the same event.
Otherwise Andy is fully right in terms of enabling us to help you.
Le 10 oct. 2017 01:25, "Andy Gumbrecht" a écrit :
> Hi Paul,
>
> In the interest of safety fir
Hi Paul,
In the interest of safety first, and benefit second, please create a
ticket here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
Rather than attaching a ZIP here, please consider creating a GitHub
project and sharing it in the ticket.
Thanks,
Andy.
On 09/10/17 15:00, Paul Carter-B
17 matches
Mail list logo
