AjaxFallbackButton really require Form in constructor?

2007-09-03 Thread Sam Hough
... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackButton-really-require-Form-in-constructor--tf4370843.html#a12457890 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: AjaxFallbackButton really require Form in constructor?

2007-09-03 Thread Johan Compagner
constructors... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackButton-really-require-Form-in-constructor--tf4370843.html#a12457890 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe

Re: AjaxFallbackButton really require Form in constructor?

2007-09-03 Thread Sam Hough
in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackButton-really-require-Form-in-constructor--tf4370843.html#a12462188 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: AjaxFallbackButton really require Form in constructor?

2007-09-03 Thread Matej Knopp
if not really needed... I'm not quite clear from the source or comments what the difference is in AjaxButton between the behaviour from the two different constructors... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackButton-really-require-Form-in-constructor

Re: AjaxFallbackButton really require Form in constructor?

2007-09-03 Thread Matthijs Wensveen
from the source or comments what the difference is in AjaxButton between the behaviour from the two different constructors... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackButton-really-require-Form-in-constructor--tf4370843.html#a12457890 Sent