Thanks again, much appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wasp-Swarm-documentation-tp4658494p4658531.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
Thanks, if you could upload that would be great.
a link here would help greatly too.
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wasp-swarm-security.html
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wasp-Swarm-documentation-tp4658494p4658527.html
Sent from the Users
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wasp-Swarm-documentation-tp4658494p4658522.html
>> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> -
I've some documentation on my disk. Takes some time to upload somewhere.
Martijn
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:40 PM, saty wrote:
> Anyone?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wasp-Swarm-documentation-tp
Anyone?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wasp-Swarm-documentation-tp4658494p4658522.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e
nabble.com/Wasp-Swarm-documentation-tp4658494.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Just update your wicketstuff dependency to 6.3.0:
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.wicketstuff/wicketstuff-security-wasp/6.3.0
Sven
On 01/21/2013 01:45 PM, BartBlackMagic wrote:
I use Wicket 6.3 and WASP to integrate security
(wicket-security-wasp-1.5-RC5.1.jar ).
When I deploy the WAR
I use Wicket 6.3 and WASP to integrate security
(wicket-security-wasp-1.5-RC5.1.jar ).
When I deploy the WAR to tomcat, I get the message:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.wicketstuff.security.log.IAuthorizationMessageSource.getMessage(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String
pository, GitHub alerts me that "File Not Found"...
> > Is this version (i know isn't the latest..) so difficult to recover??
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Leonardo
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://apache-wicket.1842946
erts me that "File Not Found"...
> Is this version (i know isn't the latest..) so difficult to recover??
>
> Thanks,
> Leonardo
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/RELEASE-WASP-SWARM-Wicket-security-1-4-1-releas
he-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/RELEASE-WASP-SWARM-Wicket-security-1-4-1-released-roadmap-for-future-direction-tp2543742p4570279.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > As Martin stated, wicket-security (wasp-swarm) is now part of
> > wicketstuff-core
> > and as such is released for every wicket release. It is maintained and it
> > will
> > continue to work, as all our major applica
Ah, thanks for the info!
@Other Dan: I poorly worded that. Role-based access is exactly what I want
to do.
-Dan
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> As Martin stated, wicket-security (wasp-swarm) is now part of
> wicketstuff-core
> and as such
Hi Dan,
As Martin stated, wicket-security (wasp-swarm) is now part of wicketstuff-core
and as such is released for every wicket release. It is maintained and it will
continue to work, as all our major applications are built on top of it.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
On Friday 09 December
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Dan Alvizu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not want
> users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they have. I
> think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintaine
ant
> users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they have. I
> think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintained anymore? I
> can't find anything current on the web since the 1.4.1 announcement.
>
> The link on the wiki leads nowhere as well:
>
&g
Hi,
I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not want
users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they have. I
think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintained anymore? I
can't find anything current on the web since the 1.4.1 an
t;
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@.apache
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@.apache
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.
All is working now.
Martijn
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> wrote:
>> It is not your problem, but strange enough the main page just works...
>
> It appears that mij hosting provider has reset/blocked the account for
>
to reset the password.
>
> Martijn
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@.apache
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@.apache
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/RELEASE-WASP-SWARM-Wicket-security-1-4-1-rele
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> It is not your problem, but strange enough the main page just works...
It appears that mij hosting provider has reset/blocked the account for
the mysql database. Investigating how to reset the password.
Martijn
--
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Leonardo D'Alimonte
wrote:
> Martin,
>
> you mean this machine goes on 503 error often:
> http://wicketstuff.org/maven/mirror ?
> I found lots of errors here instead:
> http://wicketinaction.com/2010/05/wicket-security-wasp-and-swarm-1-4-r
Martin,
you mean this machine goes on 503 error often:
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/mirror ?
I found lots of errors here instead:
http://wicketinaction.com/2010/05/wicket-security-wasp-and-swarm-1-4-released/
Every time I try to connect there it answers: "Error establishing a database
conne
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> wrote:
>> Try
>>
>> http://wicketstuff.org/maven/mirror
>>
>> I've uploaded our internal artifactory wicketstuff cache.
>
> Note that this directory will go away once I find out how to do
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Try
>
> http://wicketstuff.org/maven/mirror
>
> I've uploaded our internal artifactory wicketstuff cache.
Note that this directory will go away once I find out how to do a
rsync on the box (not installed or available on path). If/when that
is capable to find it, but it download only the
> pom, not the jar and all the dependencies. What I'm doing wrong?
>
> Thanks in advance..
> Leonardo
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/RELEASE-WASP-SWARM-Wicket-securit
nabble.com/RELEASE-WASP-SWARM-Wicket-security-1-4-1-released-roadmap-for-future-direction-tp2543742p3963284.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apac
Releasing the Wicket Security project used to be a simple mvn
release:prepare; mvn release:perform, but apparently something has
changed where finding and fixing a bug took all of 30 minutes and
releasing the software took over 3 hours with Maven's release plugin
(times two developers). While I'm n
wIcket Security
FLAWlEsS: Framework formerLy As WickEt Security
ROAST: fRamework fOrmerly As SecuriTy
regards Nino
2010/9/17 Martijn Dashorst :
> The Wicket Security project WASP/SWARM has released a new version: 1.4.1
>
> News worthy changes:
>
> * Moved code from SwarmStrategy to Abst
I haven't been following this that closely (I've only been acquainted
with Wicket for a few days) but on installing Wasp and Swarm and then
(on learning it wouldn't be a final solution) giving up on it to go
back to wicket-auth-roles as a simpler solution, might there be
another p
The Wicket Security project WASP/SWARM has released a new version: 1.4.1
News worthy changes:
* Moved code from SwarmStrategy to AbstractSwarmStrategy to allow
reuse with different implementations
* Logout now uses Session.invalidate() instead of invalidateNow(), to
prevent problems with
On Monday 25 January 2010 15:59:53 James Carman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Emond Papegaaij
> > Most of the complicated stuff is from SWARM, which indeed requires a lot
> > of configuration. The difference between WASP and SWARM is not quite
> > clear from the
the screws on their authorization,
they can do that. But, for me and my somewhat limited authorization
concerns, I'd like to use something simple.
> Most of the complicated stuff is from SWARM, which indeed requires a lot of
> configuration. The difference between WASP and SWARM
On Monday 25 January 2010 15:22:42 James Carman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emond Papegaaij
> > The current wicket-security code is somewhat limited in what you can do
> > with it. WASP provides a much richer (probably too rich) interface for
> > security. I
rity framework
> and a Wicket integration part.
>
And I didn't intend to imply that either.
> The current wicket-security code is somewhat limited in what you can do with
> it. WASP provides a much richer (probably too rich) interface for security. I
> see WASP as a viable basis
is overkill. There is no need to split SWARM into a general security framework
and a Wicket integration part.
The current wicket-security code is somewhat limited in what you can do with
it. WASP provides a much richer (probably too rich) interface for security. I
see WASP as a viable basis for
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> That sounds a bit overkill to me. I don't think anyone will ever want to use
> SWARM in a non-Wicket application. Naturally, this is a bit different for
> Shiro and spring-security, because these are existing projects (if I'm not
> mistaken
On Monday 25 January 2010 13:02:05 James Carman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Emond Papegaaij
>
> wrote:
> > I do think this is a good idea, however it will be difficult to
> > implement. WASP/SWARM already provides this setup. WASP defines the
> > in
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> I do think this is a good idea, however it will be difficult to implement.
> WASP/SWARM already provides this setup. WASP defines the interface, where
> SWARM is the implementation of that interface. I do not know about Shiro
I do think this is a good idea, however it will be difficult to implement.
WASP/SWARM already provides this setup. WASP defines the interface, where
SWARM is the implementation of that interface. I do not know about Shiro, but
I don't think it is implemented on top of WASP. So should SWA
No one has a feeling about making a "super/parent" security framework for
wicket and then let providers implement their solution.. Like JPA ? It would
mean that it would be the same using Shiro or Swarm / Wasp etc.. You just
switch provider?
2010/1/22 nino martinez wael
> I am in
Also -1 on bringing it into core. I don't feel it has wide enough adoption
to justify it being maintained by core committers. There's too many
security options out there.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> -1 on bringing
I am in doubt. What I think would be best are creating a parent framework
like wicket ioc. And then the different security providers could use that..
Does it seem reasonable?
That would mean keeping Wicket security at stuff, but probably extracting
interfaces? And maybe adopting a few committers f
-1 on bringing this into the core. its more code to maintain and we
are busy enough already making improvements to the core itself.
-igor
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project.
> Currently the project li
Hi Martijn!
> [ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
> [x] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
Best regards, --- Jan.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ben Tilford wrote:
> Assuming adopting it into Apache Wicket would mean being in the wicket jar
> instead of an optional jar.
Huh? What part of
> - adopt Wicket Security into the Wicket project and move everything
> over from Wicket Stuff into a subproject within
Assuming adopting it into Apache Wicket would mean being in the wicket jar
instead of an optional jar.
[ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
[x] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> > [ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
>
> [ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
> [x] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
I am biased, yes, but I much prefer Shiro in my Wicket apps too :)
- Les
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:52 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>>
22, 2010 4:03:48 PM
Subject: Re: Future of Wicket Security (WASP/SWARM)
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:52 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project.
> Currently the project lives on/in the wicketstuff repository, but us
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:52 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project.
> Currently the project lives on/in the wicketstuff repository, but uses
> group id and package names "org.apache.wicket". IMO We should either:
>
> - adopt Wicke
[ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
> [x ] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
>
> Pulling more code into Apache Wicket doesn't look like the best option to
me.
Looking at
http://www.ohloh.net/p/wicket/contributors?query=&sort=latest_commit I'd be
more interesed in ideas of creating more
Guys,
I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project.
Currently the project lives on/in the wicketstuff repository, but uses
group id and package names "org.apache.wicket". IMO We should either:
- adopt Wicket Security into the Wicket project and move everything
over from Wicket S
hentication added to some of my screens.
>
> Is WASP still the way to go?
> Or are there newer/better things now?
> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> -
>
I need a rather simple authentication added to some of my screens.
Is WASP still the way to go?
Or are there newer/better things now?
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe
Now I'm embarrassed for posting that question. I see there is a SecurePageLink
class that already does that I need...and I see from that source how I can
create
the LinkSecurityCheck if I wanted to do it myself.
Thanks Warren!
I've got it working now. Like everything else in Wicket, that was r
Warren Bell wrote:
> Try securing the link on your HomePage and do not secure the HomePage
> itself. The link has to implement ISecureComponent.
Warren,
I've followed your suggestion but the link is still rendering, so I'm still
missing something.
First, I made my own component MyPageLink that
to the login page. I was expecting the link to be
disabled - so
you don't even get the clickable cursor for it. Am I simply mistaken in my
understanding
of what "right to be clicked" means? Or have I missed some crucial bit
somewhere to allow
it to function as I expected?
If user is
n't even get the clickable cursor for it. Am I simply mistaken in my
> understanding
> of what "right to be clicked" means? Or have I missed some crucial bit
> somewhere to allow
> it to function as I expected?
>
> If user is not authori
low
it to function as I expected?
If user is not authorized for an action, we will either want links to be
disabled (i.e. non-
clickable) or be not rendered at all...depending on the context. Is this
something that
should be done
sure how to use it. Any help is greatly appreciated!
>
> Thanks, Jason
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/using-wasp-swarm-%2B-acegi-and-RunAs-capability-tp22444906p22446728.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
g-security/site/reference/html/runas.html
but I'm not sure how to use it. Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks, Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/using-wasp-swarm-%2B-acegi-and-RunAs-capability-tp22444906p22444906.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mail
Hmm yeah, I might see if I can get some time to look into it... However
I think Wayne pope Also mentioned that he would do something with it,
have heard nothing though my stack are a bit full at the moment..
http://www.nabble.com/WASP-SWARM-status-tt20318330.html#a20318997
Jeremy Thomerson
oping to hear from someone who has to
> help give me an idea of how much effort will be involved. Of course,
> I will be giving it a try as well, I just haven't yet.
>
> Thanks!
> Tauren
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> wrote:
>> Our com
Tauren
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Our company is quite invested in swarm/wasp (Maurice was a friend and
> co-worker). Our current projects are still 1.3 based, and several
> swarm/wasp based projects will move to wicket 1.4 as it becomes final.
> Chances
Brill,
At the moment, I just don't know. But I will certainly take your
comment to heart. I do have the feeling that this app will need more
than wicket-auth-roles can provide.
Thanks,
Tauren
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Brill Pappin wrote:
> Every time I think I want to move up from wic
Our company is quite invested in swarm/wasp (Maurice was a friend and
co-worker). Our current projects are still 1.3 based, and several
swarm/wasp based projects will move to wicket 1.4 as it becomes final.
Chances are we'll need to fix swarm/wasp as well, and invest into that
when that ha
Every time I think I want to move up from wicket-auth-roles, I realize
that its YAGNI and never do.
that said, that are times when auth-roles is a pain, but thats always
because its written so its not easily extendable.
My advice would be "do you actually need such fine grained control
over
it appropriate
>> content based on roles.
>>
>> So I'm trying to determine a security implementation for an upcoming
>> project and have been researching the options available. I've found
>> the following approaches:
>>
>> Wicket Auth
opriate
> content based on roles.
>
> So I'm trying to determine a security implementation for an upcoming
> project and have been researching the options available. I've found
> the following approaches:
>
> Wicket Auth Roles
> wicket-auth-roles-1.4-rc
following approaches:
Wicket Auth Roles
wicket-auth-roles-1.4-rc2.jar
Roles support seems quite limited
Wicket Security (SWARM and WASP)
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security+1.3.1
Looks powerful, but
/wicket-security-1.4-earlyaccess/
Wayne Pope wrote:
Hi,
After the staggering loss of Maurice I was wondering if anyone had
picked
up
the baton with WASP/SWARM?
I look at svn and the last update was from mrmean so I presume not.
I just wanted to check
Thanks
Wayne
--
Vazquez Wael <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I've been wondering the same thing...
>>>
>>> Where this what you looked at?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wic
one had picked
up
the baton with WASP/SWARM?
I look at svn and the last update was from mrmean so I presume not.
I just wanted to check
Thanks
Wayne
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.ja
; I've been wondering the same thing...
>>
>> Where this what you looked at?
>>
>>
>> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-security-1.4-earlyaccess/
>>
>>
>> Wayne Pope wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>&
>> After the staggering loss of Maurice I was wondering if anyone had picked
>> up
>> the baton with WASP/SWARM?
>> I look at svn and the last update was from mrmean so I presume not.
>>
>> I just wanted to check
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wayne
>>
I've been wondering the same thing...
Where this what you looked at?
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-security-1.4-earlyaccess/
Wayne Pope wrote:
Hi,
After the staggering loss of Maurice I was wondering if anyone had picked up
the baton with
Hi,
After the staggering loss of Maurice I was wondering if anyone had picked up
the baton with WASP/SWARM?
I look at svn and the last update was from mrmean so I presume not.
I just wanted to check
Thanks
Wayne
>
> I did some test to implement a guest auto login with swarm/wasp. I'm just
> not sure if I'm digging in the right direction.
>
> my scenario is the following:
> - all pages are implementing the interface ISecurePage
> - all pages are grouped in different pri
hi all,
I did some test to implement a guest auto login with swarm/wasp. I'm
just not sure if I'm digging in the right direction.
my scenario is the following:
- all pages are implementing the interface ISecurePage
- all pages are grouped in different principals (hive)
- i have an
> >
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> > at
> >
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
> > at
> >
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner
tRunner.java:386)
> at
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
>
> I'm using Wasp/Swarm 1.3-SNAPSHOT.
>
> Thanks
> Andrea
>
>
>
> 2008/6/20, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> In the tea
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
I'm using Wasp/Swarm 1.3-SNA
In the teardown do tester.destroy() this will clean up everything.
Maurice
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Andrea Jahn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you very much for the Java solution :) !
> I have also corrected the place to return a new custom session :).
>
> Now the first test ca
Hi,
Thank you very much for the Java solution :) !
I have also corrected the place to return a new custom session :).
Now the first test case runs without problems,
but in the second and third test case I get the following exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Another ActionFactory is al
ted void init() {
>> >super.init();
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2008/6/18, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >>
>> >> You need to call super.i
IL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> You need to call super.init(). that will fix your swarm problems. as
> >> for spring i think you need:
> >>
> >> addComponentInstantiationListener(new SpringComponentInjector(this));
> >> Injector
at will fix your swarm problems. as
>> for spring i think you need:
>>
>> addComponentInstantiationListener(new SpringComponentInjector(this));
>> InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);
>>
>> Maurice
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:23 A
M, Andrea Jahn
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after the integration of the Wasp/Swarm framework (only basic
> functionality
> > at the moment) I have to adapt the wicket JUnit tests.
> >
> > But I have the following problems:
> >
>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the integration of the Wasp/Swarm framework (only basic functionality
> at the moment) I have to adapt the wicket JUnit tests.
>
> But I have the following problems:
>
>
> public class LoginTest
> {
> private WicketTester tester;
> private
Hi,
after the integration of the Wasp/Swarm framework (only basic functionality
at the moment) I have to adapt the wicket JUnit tests.
But I have the following problems:
public class LoginTest
{
private WicketTester tester;
private FormTester form;
private PersonService personServiceMock
Why the dummy? it should work with 2 contexts just as well.
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Jahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I have different permissions for the locations. The user can have
> different
> roles for each location and each role has different permissions.
>
>
Yes, I have different permissions for the locations. The user can have
different
roles for each location and each role has different permissions.
Now I made a dummy LoginContext class and for changing the LoginContext
I first add the dummy LoginContext, then delete the old LoginContext,
then add
Didn't we use custom actions for those locations?
A user could have global or location permissions, right?
In that case the permissions would be the same for each location. The
only difference would be in the fact that the user has or does not
have a location. which is checked by your securitychec
Hi,
in our application the user's rights depend on the location (Munich,
Berlin,...).
There's a drop down choice, where the user can change the location, on which
he wants to work.
So, when he changes the location, also the principals (permissions) have to
be changed.
How can I remove the old pr
:-)
Thank you very much for the code example of the method onBeforeRender() for the
WebMarkupContainer.
I have implemented it and it works fine :-)
Andrea
*Von:* "Maurice Marrink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Gesendet:* 06.06.08 13:50:38
*An:* users@wicket.apache.org
*Betreff:* Re: Wasp/
Well assuming you are only using a securewebmarkupcontainer to hide
the entire menu if a user as no permissions for any of the pages
accessible from that menu.
Otherwise there really is no need since the links will be hidden.
Then you have a couple of options.
-Use a datapermission for each swmc
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Uwe Schäfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maurice Marrink schrieb:
>
>> Yes that is exactly what wasp is for.
>
> cool, at least one thing i got right ;)
>
>> You can either extend WaspAuthorizationStrategy or
>> ClassAutho
Maurice Marrink schrieb:
Yes that is exactly what wasp is for.
cool, at least one thing i got right ;)
You can either extend WaspAuthorizationStrategy or
ClassAuthorizationStrategy. The latter provides a basic implementation
to do component instantiation checks based on static fields
Hi Uwe,
Yes that is exactly what wasp is for.
You can either extend WaspAuthorizationStrategy or
ClassAuthorizationStrategy. The latter provides a basic implementation
to do component instantiation checks based on static fields available
on the class. if you use java 1.5+ you could build your
hi
i have my own authentication and authorization stuff ready and want to
hook it into wicket. that´s what wasp is for, right ?
ok, after reading a few pages and browsing trough the code, i THINK what
i want then, is using WASP without that SWARM thingy.
is there any tutorial/presentaation
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
